Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of Micro- and Macroscopically Positive Surgical Margins on Survival after Resection of Adrenocortical Carcinoma

  • Endocrine Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare, aggressive cancer; complete surgical resection offers the best chance for long-term survival. The impact of surgical margin status on survival is poorly understood. Our objective was to determine the association of margin status with survival.

Methods

Patients with ACC were identified from the National Cancer Data Base, 1998–2012, and stratified based on surgical margin status (negative vs. microscopically positive [+] vs. macroscopically [+]). Univariate/multivariate regression/survival analyses were utilized to determine factors associated with margin status and overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 1553 patients underwent surgery at 589 institutions: 86% had negative, 12% microscopically (+), and 2% macroscopically (+) margins. Those with microscopically (+) and macroscopically (+) margins more often received adjuvant chemotherapy (39.4% macroscopically (+) vs. 38.5% microscopically (+) vs. 25.2% negative margins, p < 0.001). For unadjusted analysis, there was a significant difference in OS between the groups (log-rank p < 0.001), with median survival times of 58 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 49–66) for those with negative margins, 22 months (95% CI 18–34) microscopically (+), and 14 months (95% CI 6–27) macroscopically (+) margins. After adjustment, both microscopically (+) (HR 1.76, p < 0.001) and macroscopically (+) (HR 2.10, p = 0.0019) margin status were associated with compromised survival.

Conclusions

Having micro- or macroscopically (+) margin status after ACC resection is associated with dose-dependent compromised survival. These results underscore the importance of achieving negative surgical margins for optimizing long-term patient outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Livhits M, Li N, Yeh MW, Harari A. Surgery is associated with improved survival for adrenocortical cancer, even in metastatic disease. Surgery. 2014;156:1531–40; discussion 1540-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Fassnacht M, Johanssen S, Quinkler M, et al. Limited prognostic value of the 2004 International Union Against Cancer staging classification for adrenocortical carcinoma: proposal for a Revised TNM Classification. Cancer. 2009;115:243–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gratian L, Pura J, Dinan M, et al. Treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with adrenocortical carcinoma associated with hospital case volume in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:3509–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Grubbs EG, Callender GG, Xing Y, et al. Recurrence of adrenal cortical carcinoma following resection: surgery alone can achieve results equal to surgery plus mitotane. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:263–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dackiw AP, Lee JE, Gagel RF, Evans DB. Adrenal cortical carcinoma. World J Surg. 2001;25:914-26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee JE, Berger DH, el-Naggar AK, et al. Surgical management, DNA content, and patient survival in adrenal cortical carcinoma. Surgery. 1995;118:1090–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mihai R: diagnosis, treatment and outcome of adrenocortical cancer. Br J Surg. 2015;102:291–306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ayala-Ramirez M, Jasim S, Feng L, et al. Adrenocortical carcinoma: clinical outcomes and prognosis of 330 patients at a tertiary care center. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;169:891–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ronchi CL, Kroiss M, Sbiera S, et al. EJE prize 2014: current and evolving treatment options in adrenocortical carcinoma: where do we stand and where do we want to go? Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;171:R1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bilimoria KY, Shen WT, Elaraj D, et al. Adrenocortical carcinoma in the United States: treatment utilization and prognostic factors. Cancer. 2008;113:3130–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kendrick ML, Lloyd R, Erickson L, et al. Adrenocortical carcinoma: surgical progress or status quo? Arch Surg. 2001;136:543–9.

  12. Abdel-Wahab M, El-Husseiny TS, El Hanafy E, et al. Prognostic factors affecting survival and recurrence after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic liver. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2010;395:625–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. de Haas RJ, Wicherts DA, Flores E, et al. R1 resection by necessity for colorectal liver metastases: is it still a contraindication to surgery? Ann Surg. 2008;248:626–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Margonis GA, Spolverato G, Kim Y, et al. Intraoperative surgical margin re-resection for colorectal liver metastasis: is it worth the effort? J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19:699–707.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Else T, Williams AR, Sabolch A, et al. Adjuvant therapies and patient and tumor characteristics associated with survival of adult patients with adrenocortical carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:455–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Loncar Z, Djukic V, Zivaljevic V, et al. Survival and prognostic factors for adrenocortical carcinoma: a single institution experience. BMC Urol. 2015;15:43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Wanis KN, Kanthan R: Diagnostic and prognostic features in adrenocortical carcinoma: a single institution case series and review of the literature. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13:117.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Margonis GA, Kim Y, Prescott JD, et al. Adrenocortical carcinoma: impact of surgical margin status on long-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:134–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Raval MV, Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, et al. Using the NCDB for cancer care improvement: an introduction to available quality assessment tools. Journal of surgical oncology 2009;99:488–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:613–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Miller BS, Doherty GM. Surgical management of adrenocortical tumours. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10:282–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ip JC, Pang TC, Glover AR, et al. Improving outcomes in adrenocortical cancer: an Australian perspective. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:2309–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Amini N, Margonis GA, Kim Y, et al. Curative resection of adrenocortical carcinoma: rates and patterns of postoperative recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:126–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by a NIH TL-1 clinical and translational science award (CTSA), Grant number 1UL1-TR001117-01 (NCATS). J. A. S. is a member of the data monitoring committee of the Medullary Thyroid Cancer Consortium Registry supported by NovoNordisk, GlaxoSmithKline, Astra Zeneca, and Eli Lilly. The other authors report no proprietary or commercial interest in any product mentioned or concept discussed in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randall P. Scheri MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anderson, K.L., Adam, M.A., Thomas, S.M. et al. Impact of Micro- and Macroscopically Positive Surgical Margins on Survival after Resection of Adrenocortical Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 25, 1425–1431 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6398-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6398-5

Keywords

Navigation