Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Synthesis, Spectral Characterization, and In Vitro Cellular Activities of Metapristone, a Potential Cancer Metastatic Chemopreventive Agent Derived from Mifepristone (RU486)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
The AAPS Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mifepristone (RU486) is marketed and used widely by women as an abortifacient, and experimentally for psychotic depression and anticancer treatments. After administration, metapristone is found to be the most predominant metabolite of mifepristone. We hypothesized that adhesion of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) to vascular endothelial bed is a crucial starting point in metastatic cascade, and that metapristone can serve as a cancer metastatic chemopreventive agent that can interrupt adhesion and invasion of CTCs to the intima of microvasculature. In the present study, we modified the synthesis procedure to produce grams of metapristone, fully characterized its spectral properties and in vitro cellular activities, including its cytostatic effects, cell cycle arrest, mitochondrial membrane potential, and apoptosis on human colorectal cancer HT-29 cells. Metapristone concentration dependently interrupted adhesion of HT-29 cells to endothelial cells. Metapristone may potentially be a useful agent to interrupt metastatic initiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Fleseriu M, Biller BM, Findling JW, Molitch ME, Schteingart DE, Gross C, et al. Mifepristone, a glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, produces clinical and metabolic benefits in patients with Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocr Metab. 2012;97(6):2039–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. El Etreby MF, Liang YY, Wrenn RW, Schoenlein PV. Additive effect of mifepristone and tamoxifen on apoptotic pathways in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Tr. 1998;51(2):149–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fiscella J, Bonfiglio T, Winters P, Eisinger SH, Fiscella K. Distinguishing features of endometrial pathology after exposure to the progesterone receptor modulator mifepristone. Hum Pathol. 2011;42(7):947–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fried G, Meister B, Râdestad A. Peptide-containing nerves in the human pregnant uterine cervix: an immunohistochemical study exploring the effect of RU 486 (mifepristone). Hum Reprod. 1990;5(7):870–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ligr M, Li Y, Logan SK, Taneja S, Melamed J, Lepor H, et al. Mifepristone inhibits GRβ coupled prostate cancer cell proliferation. J Urol. 2012;188(3):981–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goel N, Malik R, Rathi B, Bhaskaran S, Rajaram S, Mehta S, et al. Pregnancy with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) on imatinib chemotherapy: an oncologist’s nightmare and obstetrician’s dilemma. J Gastroint Cancer. 2013;44(1):115–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Y, Yang D, Song L, Li T, Yang J, Zhang X, et al. Mifepristone-inducible caspase-1 expression in mouse embryonic stem cells eliminates tumor formation but spares differentiated cells in vitro and in vivo. Stem Cells. 2012;30(2):169–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cher ML, Towler DA, Rafii S, Rowley D, Donahue HJ, Keller E, et al. Cancer interaction with the bone microenvironment: a workshop of the National Institutes of Health Tumor Microenvironment Study Section. Am J Pathol. 2006;168(5):1405–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wempe SL, Gamarra-Luques CD, Telleria CM. Synergistic lethality of mifepristone and LY294002 in ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Growth Metast. 2013;6:1–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen JZ, Wang JC, Xu JG, Shao JW, Jia L. Pharmaceutical characteristics of mifepristone: from terminating pregnancy to preventing cancer metastasis. Med Res Rev 2013 (in press).

  11. de Moor JS, Mariotto AB, Parry C, Alfano CM, Padgett L, Kent EE, et al. Cancer survivors in the United States: prevalence across the survivorship trajectory and implications for care. Cancer Epidem Biomar. 2013;22(4):561–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heikinheimo O, Haukkamaa M, Lahteenmaki P. Distribution of RU 486 and its demethylated metabolites in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1989;68(2):270–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shi YE, Ye ZH, He CH, Zhang GQ, Xu JQ, Van Look PF, et al. Pharmacokinetic study of RU 486 and its metabolites after oral administration of single doses to pregnant and non-pregnant women. Contraception. 1993;48(2):133–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Teng YN, Dong RQ, Wang BJ, Liu HJ, Jiang ZM, Wei CM, et al. Determinations of mifepristone and its metabolites and their pharmacokinetics in healthy female Chinese subjects. Acta Pharm Sin. 2011;46(10):1241–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Heikinheimo O, Kontula K, Croxatto H, Spitz I, Luukkainen T, Lahteenmaki P. Plasma concentrations and receptor binding of RU 486 and its metabolites in humans. J Steroid Biochem. 1987;26(2):279–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Haier J, Nasralla M, Nicolson GL. Cell surface molecules and their prognostic values in assessing colorectal carcinomas. Ann Surg. 2000;231(1):11–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Permezel JM, Lenton EA, Roberts I, Cooke ID. Acute effects of progesterone and the antiprogestin RU 486 on gonadotropin secretion in the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1989;68(5):960–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lash GE, Fitzpatrick TE, Graham CH. Effect of hypoxia on cellular adhesion to vitronectin and fibronectin. Biochem Bioph Res Co. 2001;287(3):622–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Arck P, Hagen E, Hildebrandt M, Klapp B, Hertwig K. Pregnancy as a model of controlled invasion might be attributed to the ratio of CD3/CD8 to CD56. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2000;44(1):1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Murray MJ, Lessey BA. Embryo implantation and tumor metastasis: common pathways of invasion and angiogenesis. Semin Reprod Endocrinol. 1999;17(3):275–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fitzpatrick TE, Lash GE, Yanaihara A, Charnock-Jones DS, Macdonald-Goodfellow SK, Graham CH. Inhibition of breast carcinoma and trophoblast cell invasiveness by vascular endothelial growth factor. Exp Cell Res. 2003;283(2):247–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Janneau JL, Maldonado-Estrada J, Tachdjian G, Miran I, Motté N, Saulnier P, et al. Transcriptional expression of genes involved in cell invasion and migration by normal and tumoral trophoblast cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(11):5336–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hödl C, Raunegger K, Strommer R, Ecker GF, Kunert O, Sturm S, et al. Syntheses and antigestagenic activity of Mifepristone derivatives. J Med Chem. 2009;52(5):1268–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hödl C, Strauss WS, Sailer R, Seger C, Steiner R, Haslinger E, et al. A novel, high-affinity, fluorescent progesterone receptor antagonist. Synthesis and in vitro studies. Bioconjug Chem. 2004;15(2):359–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shao J, Dai Y, Zhao W, Xie J, Xue J, Ye J, et al. Intracellular distribution and mechanisms of actions of photosensitizer zinc(II)-phthalocyanine solubilized in Cremophor EL against human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells. Cancer Lett. 2013;330(1):49–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jaffe EA, Nachman RL, Becker CG, Minick CR. Culture of human endothelial cells derived from umbilical veins. Identification by morphologic and immunologic criteria. J Clin Invest. 1973;52(11):2745–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zamzami N, Marchetti P, Castedo M, Decaudin D, Macho A, Hirsch T, et al. Sequential reduction of mitochondrial transmembrane potential and generation of reactive oxygen species in early programmed cell death. J Exp Med. 1995;182(2):367–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shao J, Xue J, Dai Y, Liu H, Chen N, Jia L, et al. Inhibition of human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 by phthalocyanine photosensitiser PHOTOCYANINE: ROS production, apoptosis, cell cycle arrest. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(13):2086–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schoch GA, D'Arcy B, Stihle M, Burger D, Bär D, Benz J, et al. Molecular switch in the glucocorticoid receptor: active and passive antagonist conformations. J Mol Biol. 2010;395(3):568–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Honer C, Nam K, Fink C, Marshall P, Ksander G, Chatelain RE, et al. Glucocorticoid receptor antagonism by cyproterone acetate and RU486. Mol Pharmacol. 2003;63(5):1012–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. von Geldern TW, Tu N, Kym PR, Link JT, Jae HS, Lai C, et al. Liver-selective glucocorticoid antagonists: a novel treatment for type 2 diabetes. J Med Chem. 2004;47(17):4213–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Macindoe G, Mavridis L, Venkatraman V, Devignes MD, Ritchie DW. HexServer: an FFT-based protein docking server powered by graphics processors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(Web Server issue):W445–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Li DQ, Wang ZB, Bai J, Zhao J, Wang Y, Hu K, et al. Effects of mifepristone on invasive and metastatic potential of human gastric adenocarcinoma cell line MKN-45 in vitro and in vivo. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10(12):1726–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Saha P, Hödl C, Strauss WS, Steiner R, Goessler W, Kunert O, et al. Synthesis, in vitro progesterone receptors affinity of gadolinium containing mifepristone conjugates and estimation of binding sites in human breast cancer cells. Bioorgan Med Chem. 2010;18(5):1891–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ma Y, Katiyar P, Jones LP, Fan S, Zhang Y, Furth PA, et al. The breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 regulates progesterone receptor signaling in mammary epithelial cells. Mol Endocrinol. 2006;20(1):14–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang L, Wang XM, Jiao XM, Liu SS. The effect of superoxide ainon on transmembrane potential and proton transfer of myocardial mitochondria. Chinese J Pathophysiol. 1996;12(2):181–4.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vermes I, Haanen C, Steffens-Nakken H, Reutellingsperger C. A novel assay for apoptosis flow cytometric detection of phosphatidylserine expression on early apoptotic cells using fluorescein labelled annexin V. J Immunol Methods. 1995;184(1):39–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ferretti C, Bruni L, Dangles-Marie V, Pecking A, Bellet D. Molecular circuits shared by placental and cancer cells, and their implications in the proliferative, invasive and migratory capacities of trophoblasts. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13(2):121–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ellis LM, Radinsky R, Fidler IJ. Recent advances in the biology of cancer invasion and metastasis. Surgical Oncology: Contemporary Principles and Practice. 2001. p. 101–22.

Download references

Acknowledgements

These studies were supported by grants from the National Science Foundation of China Nos. 81201709, J1103303 and 81273548. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jingwei Shao or Lee Jia.

Additional information

Jichuang Wang and Jianzhong Chen These authors equally contributed to the work.

The study was presented in part at the 2013 annual meeting of American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, Antonio, TX, USA; November, 2013.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, J., Chen, J., Wan, L. et al. Synthesis, Spectral Characterization, and In Vitro Cellular Activities of Metapristone, a Potential Cancer Metastatic Chemopreventive Agent Derived from Mifepristone (RU486). AAPS J 16, 289–298 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-013-9559-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-013-9559-2

KEY WORDS

Navigation