Skip to main content
Log in

A simulation study on tests of hypotheses and confidence intervals for fixed effects in mixed models for blocked experiments with missing data

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article considers the analysis of experiments with missing data from various experimental designs frequently used in agricultural research (randomized complete blocks, split plots, strip plots). We investigate the small sample properties of REML-based Wald-type F tests using linear mixed models. Several methods for approximating the denominator degrees of freedom are employed, all of which are available with the MIXED procedure of the SAS System (8.02). The simulation results show that the Kenward-Roger method provides the best control of the Type I error rate and is not inferior to other methods in terms of power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahrens, H. (1967), Die Varianzanalyse, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fai, A. H. T., and Cornelius, P. L. (1996), “Approximate F-Tests of Multiple Degree of Freedom Hypotheses in Generalized Least Squares Analyses of Unbalanced Split-Plot Experiments,” Journal of Statistical Computing and Simulation, 54, 363–378.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Giesbrecht, F. G., and Burns, J. C. (1985), “Two-Stage Analysis Based on a Mixed Model: Large-Sample Asymptotic Theory and Small-Sample Simulation Results,” Biometrics, 41, 477–486.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guiard, V., Spilke, J., and Dänicke, S. (2003), “Evaluation and Interpretation of the Results for Three Cross-Over Designs,” Archives of Animal Nutrition, 57, 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, H. O., and Rao, C. R. (1967), “Maximum Likelihood Estimation for the Mixed Analysis of Variance Model,” Biometrika, 54, 93–108.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, C. R. (1963), “Selection Index and Expected Genetic Advance,” Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding, NAS-NRC Publ. No. 982, 141–163.

  • — (1984), Application of Linear Models in Animal Breeding, Guelph: University of Guelph.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1990), “Statistical Method in Animal Improvement: Historical Overview,” in Advances in Statistical Methods for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kackar, A. N., and Harville, D. A. (1981), “Unbiasedness of Two-Stage Estimation and Precision Procedures for Mixed Linear Models,” Communications in Statistics A, 10, 1249–1261.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (1984), “Approximation for Standard Errors of Estimators of Fixed and Random Effects in Mixed Linear Models,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 853–861.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kenward, M. G., and Roger, J. H. (1997), “Small Sample Inference for Fixed Effects from Restricted Maximum Likelihood,” Biometrics, 53, 983–997.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Keselman, H. J., Kowalchuk, R. K., Algina, J., and Wolfinger, R. D. (1999), “The Analysis of Repeated Measurements: A Comparison of Mixed-Model Satterthwaite F tests and a Nonpooled Adjusted Degrees of Freedom Multivariate Test,” Communications in Statistics A, 28, 2967–2999.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Khuri, A. I., Mathew, T., and Sinha, B. K. (1998), Statistical Tests for Mixed Linear Models, New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lamotte, L. R. (1973), “Quadratic Estimation of Variance Components,” Biometrics, 29, 311–330.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, H. D., and Thompson, R. (1971), “Recovery of Inter-Block Information When Block Sizes are Unequal,” Biometrika, 58, 545–554.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Piepho, H. P. (1997), “Analysis of a Randomized Complete Block Design with Unequal Subclass Numbers,” Agronomy Journal, 89, 718–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. R. (1971), “Minimum Variance Quadratic Unbiased Estimation of Variance Components,” Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 1, 445–456.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Remmenga, M. D., and Johnson, D. E. (1995), “A Comparison of Inference Procedures in Unbalanced Split-Plot Designs,” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 51, 353–367.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1999), SAS OnlineDoc®, Version 8, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satterthwaite, F. E. (1941), “Synthesis of Variance,” Psychometrika, 6, 309–316.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schaalje, G. B., McBride, J. B., and Fellingham, G. W. (2002), “Adequacy of Approximation to Distributions of Test Statistics in Complex Mixed Linear Models,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 7, 512–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, S. R. (1971), “Topics in Variance Component Estimation,” Biometrics, 27, 1–76.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (1987), Linear Models for Unbalanced Data, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, S. R., Casella, G., and McCulloch, C. E. (1992), Variance Components, New York: Wiley.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Spilke, J., and Tuchscherer, A. (2001), “Simulationsuntersuchungen zum Einfluss verschiedener Strategien der Varianzkomponentenschätzung und Hypothesenprüfung auf die statistischen Risiken in gemischten line aren Modellen mit ungleicher Klassenbesetzung,” Zeitschrift für Agrarinformatik, 4, 66–75.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim Spilke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spilke, J., Piepho, HP. & Hu, X. A simulation study on tests of hypotheses and confidence intervals for fixed effects in mixed models for blocked experiments with missing data. JABES 10, 374–389 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1198/108571105X58199

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/108571105X58199

Key Words

Navigation