Skip to main content
Log in

An Investigation of the Traditional Algorithm-Based Designs for Phase 1 Cancer Clinical Trials

  • Published:
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary aim of a phase 1 cancer clinical trial is to determine the maximum tolerated dose of a new drug. Although the continual reassessment method is shown to have better operating characteristics than traditional designs, traditional designs are still widely used in practice. Kang and Ahn (!) developed an algorithm to compute the exact distribution of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in traditional designs with dose deescalation and investigated the expected toxicity rate at the MTD with the algorithm. In this paper, using the exact formulae derived by Lin and Shih (2). we study the expected toxicity rate at the MTD and the expected number of patients with toxicity and patients required when the hyperbolic tangent and the logistic functions are used as the unknown dose-toxicity cun’es. We consider the expected toxicity rate both without and with dose deescalation. No further study was done before in cases where dose level zero is chosen as the MTD. Since, in real practice, dose levels are lowered for adjustment and a new trial is conducted when dose level zero is decided as the MTD, we also incorporate this dose adjustment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kang S. Ahn C. The expected toxicity rate at the maximum tolerated dose in the standard phase I cancer clinical trial design. Drug Inf J. 2001:35(4):1189–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lin Y, Shih W. Statistical properties of the traditional algorithm-based designs for phase 1 cancer clinical trails. Biostatistics. 2001;2:203–215.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Quigley J. Pepe M, Fisher M. Continual reassessment method: A practical design for phase I clinical trials in cancer. Biometrics. 1990:46:33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Quigley J, Chevret S. Methods for dose finding studies in cancer trials: A review and results of a Monte Carlo study. Stat Med. 1991;10:1647–1664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Faries D. Practical modifications of the continual reassessment method for phase I cancer clinical trials. J Biopharmaceutical Stat. 1994;4:147–164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goodman S, Zahurak M, Piantadosi S. Some practical improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies. Stat Med. 1995;14:1149–1161.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Moller S. An extension of the continual reassessment methods using a preliminary up-and-down design in a dose finding study in cancer patients, in order to investigate a greater range of doses. Stat Med. 1995;14:911–922.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ann C. An evaluation of phase I cancer clinical trial designs. Stat Med. 1998;17:1537–1549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Korn E, Midthune D, Chen T, Rubinstein L, Christian M, Simon R. A comparison of two phase I trial designs. Stat Med. 1994;13:1799–1806.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zohar S, Chevret S. The continual reassessment method: comparing of Bayesian stopping rules for dose-ranging studies. Stat Med. 2001;20:2827–2843.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldsmith M, Slavik M, Carter S. Quantitative prediction of drug toxicity in human from toxicology in small and large animals. Cancer Research. 1975;35:1354–1364.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith T, Lee J, Kantarjian H, Legha S, Raber M. Design and results of phase I cancer clinical trial: three-year experience at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. J Clinical Oncology. 1996;14(1):287–295.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung-Ho Kang PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kang, SH., Ahn, C.W. An Investigation of the Traditional Algorithm-Based Designs for Phase 1 Cancer Clinical Trials. Ther Innov Regul Sci 36, 865–873 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150203600415

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150203600415

Key Words

Navigation