Skip to main content
Log in

Good Practices for Adaptive Clinical Trials in Pharmaceutical Product Development

  • Biostatistics
  • Published:
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article is a summary of good adaptive practices for the planning and implementation of adaptive designs compiled from experiences gained in the pharmaceutical industry. The target audience is anyone involved in the planning and execution of clinical trials. The first step prior to planning an adaptive design is to assess the appropriateness of its use. Hence, strategic points to consider when assessing if an adaptive design is the right choice for a trial are discussed. In addition, strategic points for consideration at the design and implementation stage are included from operational, regulatory, clinical, and statistical perspectives. Good practices for trial simulation, trial documentation, and data monitoring committees are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gallo P, Chuang-Stein C, Dragaiin V, Gaydos B, Krams M, Pinheiro J. Executive summary of the PhRMA Working Group on Adaptive Designs in Clinical Drug Development. J Biopharm Stat. 2006;16:275–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. PhRMA Working Group on Adaptive Designs. Full white paper. Drug Inf J. 2006;40:421–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Quinlan JA, Krams M. Implementing adaptive designs: logistical and operational considerations. Drug Inf J. 2006;40:437–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaydos B, Krams M, Perevozskaya I, et al. Adaptive dose response studies. Drug Inf J. 2006; 40:451–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bornkamp B, Bretz F, Dmitrienko A, et al. Innovative approaches for designing and analyzing adaptive dose-ranging trials. J Biopharm Stat. 2007;17:965–995. Available at: https://doi.org/biopharmnet.com/doc/doc12005.html.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Maca J, Bhattacharya S, Dragalin V, Gallo P, Krams M. Adaptive seamless phase II/III designs—background, operational aspects, and examples. Drug Inf J. 2006;4:463–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gould AL, Shih WJ. Sample size re-estimation without unblinding for normally distributed outcomes with unknown variance. Comm Stat. 1992;(A)21:2833–2853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sandvik L, Erikssen J, Mowinckel P, Rodland EA. A method for determining the size of internal pilot studies. Stat Med. 1996;15:1587–1590.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chuang-Stein C, Anderson K, Gallo P, Collins S. Sample size reestimation: a review and recommendations. Drug Inf J. 2006;40:475–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Krams M, Lees KR, Hacke W, Grieve AP, Orgogozo J-M, Ford GA. Acute stroke therapy by inhibition of neutrophils (ASTIN): an adaptive dose response study of UK-279,276 in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2003;34:2543–2548.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Berry DA, Müller P, Grieve AP, et al. Adaptive Bayesian designs for dose-ranging drug trials. In Gatsonis C, Carlin B, Carriquiry A, eds., Case Studies in Bayesian Statistics V:99–181. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Berry DA. Bayesian clinical trials. Nature Rev Drug Discovery. 2006;5:27–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gallo P, Chuang-Stein C. What should be the role of homogeneity testing in adaptive trials? Pharm Stat. 2009;8:1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Posch M, Koenig F, Branson M, Brannath W, Dunger-Baldauf C, Bauer P. Testing and estimation in flexible group sequential designs with adaptive treatment selection. Stat Med. 2005; 24:3697–3714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brannath W, König F, Bauer P. Estimation in flexible two-stage designs. Stat Med. 2005;25: 3366–3381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brannath W, Posch M, Bauer P. Recursive combination tests. J Am Stat Assoc. 2002;97:236–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brenda Gaydos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gaydos, B., Anderson, K.M., Berry, D. et al. Good Practices for Adaptive Clinical Trials in Pharmaceutical Product Development. Ther Innov Regul Sci 43, 539–556 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150904300503

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150904300503

Key Words

Navigation