The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.55.4.350

The treatment of depression largely falls to providers in primary care settings, which have been identified as the de facto mental health delivery system (1). Systemwide programs to improve depression care have been initiated in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and in other health care organizations (2,3). One such VA initiative is screening for depression as part of the Prevention Index, which was mandated in 1998 as an annual screening tool for all primary care patients. Our study investigated diagnosis patterns of depressive disorders in VA primary care clinics over a five-year period. Specifically, we wanted to determine whether primary care service use data indicated that implementing and monitoring the mandated depression screening affected depression diagnosis rates.

Data on all primary care visits were gathered from the VA's national outpatient service use database for fiscal years 1997 to 2001. In the database, all primary care visits carry a primary diagnosis that indicates the main reason for and the presenting problem at the visit as well as up to ten secondary diagnoses.

Overall, the frequency with which depression was diagnosed, as well as the percentage of the primary care population who received a diagnosis of depression, increased across the study years. As can be seen in Figure 1, the rates of primary diagnosis of depression remained unchanged in our study.

Despite the overall increase in the diagnosis of depression in the primary care setting, it is important to note that among veterans with a primary care diagnosis of depression, the average number of primary care visits for which a primary diagnosis of depression was noted did not vary across the study period (1.4 or 1.3 visits) and falls well below guideline recommendations for the treatment of depression in this population (4).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grant NMH98-001 from the Department of Veterans Affairs Mental Health Quality Enhancement Research Initiative and by grant IIR-98086-3 from the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Service.

Dr. Kirchner and Dr. Curran are affiliated with the Department of Veterans Affairs South Central Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, 2200 Fort Roots Drive, Building 58, North Little Rock, Arkansas 72114 (e-mail, ). All of the authors are with the Department of Veterans Affairs Mental Health Quality Enhancement Research Initiative. Harold Alan Pincus, M.D., and Terri L. Tanielian, M.A., are editors of this column.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Patients with a diagnosis of depressive disorder among veterans in Department ofVeterans Affairs (VA) primary care clinics, from the VA national outpatient serviceuse database for fiscal years 1997 to 2001a

a Yearly changes significant at p<.001

References

1. Regier DA, Narrow WE, Rae DS, et al: The de facto US mental and addictive disorders service system: Epidemiologic Catchment Area prospective 1-year prevalence rates of disorders and services. Archives of General Psychiatry 50:85–94, 1993Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

2. VHA/DoD Performance Measures for the Management of Major Depressive Disorder in Adults, Version 1. Washington, DC, Department of Defense, Veterans Health Administration Office of Performance and Quality, US Army Quality Management Directorate, External Peer Review Program, Feb 2000Google Scholar

3. Donabedian A: Specialization in clinical performance monitoring: what it is and how to achieve it. Quality Assurance and Utilization Review 5:114–120, 1990Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4. VHA/DOD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Major Depressive Disorder in Adults, Version 2. Washington, DC, Veterans Health Administration Office of Performance and Quality, US Army Quality Management Directorate, External Peer Review Program, Feb 2000Google Scholar