Advertisement
Research ArticleHematology Free access | 10.1172/JCI32322
1Celgene Corporation, San Diego, California, USA. 2Celgene Corporation, Summit, New Jersey, USA. 3Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: Laure A. Moutouh-de Parseval, Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, New Jersey 07901, USA. Phone: (908) 673-9330; Fax: (908) 673-2774; E-mail: ldeparse@celgene.com.
Find articles by Moutouh-de Parseval, L. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Celgene Corporation, San Diego, California, USA. 2Celgene Corporation, Summit, New Jersey, USA. 3Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: Laure A. Moutouh-de Parseval, Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, New Jersey 07901, USA. Phone: (908) 673-9330; Fax: (908) 673-2774; E-mail: ldeparse@celgene.com.
Find articles by Verhelle, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Celgene Corporation, San Diego, California, USA. 2Celgene Corporation, Summit, New Jersey, USA. 3Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: Laure A. Moutouh-de Parseval, Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, New Jersey 07901, USA. Phone: (908) 673-9330; Fax: (908) 673-2774; E-mail: ldeparse@celgene.com.
Find articles by Glezer, E. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Celgene Corporation, San Diego, California, USA. 2Celgene Corporation, Summit, New Jersey, USA. 3Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: Laure A. Moutouh-de Parseval, Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, New Jersey 07901, USA. Phone: (908) 673-9330; Fax: (908) 673-2774; E-mail: ldeparse@celgene.com.
Find articles by Jensen-Pergakes, K. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Celgene Corporation, San Diego, California, USA. 2Celgene Corporation, Summit, New Jersey, USA. 3Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: Laure A. Moutouh-de Parseval, Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, New Jersey 07901, USA. Phone: (908) 673-9330; Fax: (908) 673-2774; E-mail: ldeparse@celgene.com.
Find articles by Ferguson, G. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Celgene Corporation, San Diego, California, USA. 2Celgene Corporation, Summit, New Jersey, USA. 3Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: Laure A. Moutouh-de Parseval, Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, New Jersey 07901, USA. Phone: (908) 673-9330; Fax: (908) 673-2774; E-mail: ldeparse@celgene.com.
Find articles by Corral, L. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Celgene Corporation, San Diego, California, USA. 2Celgene Corporation, Summit, New Jersey, USA. 3Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: Laure A. Moutouh-de Parseval, Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, New Jersey 07901, USA. Phone: (908) 673-9330; Fax: (908) 673-2774; E-mail: ldeparse@celgene.com.
Find articles by Morris, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Celgene Corporation, San Diego, California, USA. 2Celgene Corporation, Summit, New Jersey, USA. 3Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: Laure A. Moutouh-de Parseval, Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, New Jersey 07901, USA. Phone: (908) 673-9330; Fax: (908) 673-2774; E-mail: ldeparse@celgene.com.
Find articles by Muller, G. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Celgene Corporation, San Diego, California, USA. 2Celgene Corporation, Summit, New Jersey, USA. 3Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: Laure A. Moutouh-de Parseval, Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, New Jersey 07901, USA. Phone: (908) 673-9330; Fax: (908) 673-2774; E-mail: ldeparse@celgene.com.
Find articles by Brady, H. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Celgene Corporation, San Diego, California, USA. 2Celgene Corporation, Summit, New Jersey, USA. 3Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: Laure A. Moutouh-de Parseval, Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, New Jersey 07901, USA. Phone: (908) 673-9330; Fax: (908) 673-2774; E-mail: ldeparse@celgene.com.
Find articles by Chan, K. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published December 6, 2007 - More info
Sickle-cell disease (SCD) and β thalassemia constitute worldwide public health problems. New therapies, including hydroxyurea, have attempted to augment the synthesis of fetal hemoglobin (HbF) and improve current treatment. Lenalidomide and pomalidomide are members of a class of immunomodulators used as anticancer agents. Because clinical trials have demonstrated that lenalidomide reduces or eliminates the need for transfusions in some patients with disrupted blood cell production, we investigated the effects of lenalidomide and pomalidomide on erythropoiesis and hemoglobin synthesis. We used an in vitro erythropoiesis model derived from human CD34+ progenitor cells from normal and SCD donors. We found that both compounds slowed erythroid maturation, increased proliferation of immature erythroid cells, and regulated hemoglobin transcription, resulting in potent induction of HbF without the cytotoxicity associated with other HbF inducers. When combined with hydroxyurea, pomalidomide and, to a lesser extent, lenalidomide were found to have synergistic effects on HbF upregulation. Our results elucidate what we believe to be a new mechanism of action of pomalidomide and lenalidomide and support the hypothesis that pomalidomide, used alone or in combination with hydroxyurea, may improve erythropoiesis and increase the ratio of fetal to adult hemoglobin. These findings support the evaluation of pomalidomide as an innovative new therapy for β-hemoglobinopathies.
Sickle-cell disease (SCD) is a genetic hemoglobin (Hb) disorder that results in polymerization of sickle-cell Hb (HbS) upon deoxygenation, leading to a chronic cycle of ischemia/reperfusion vascular and tissue injury. β Thalassemia is a hereditary anemia resulting from defects in Hb production due to a decrease in β-globin gene expression. The human β-globin locus is composed of the locus control region (β-globin LCR), the ε-globin gene that is active in early fetal life, the γ-globin genes (Gγ globin and Aγ globin), expressed mostly during fetal life, and the δ- and β-globin genes, which are activated late in fetal life, with the β-globin gene being most highly expressed in erythroid cells after birth and in adults. Based on the understanding of the pathophysiology of SCD and β thalassemia, new experimental therapies attempt to augment the synthesis of fetal Hb (HbF) to limit the occurrence of vasoocclusive painful crises by inhibiting the formation of HbS polymers when the red cell is deoxygenated (1–3). The benefit of increasing HbF was first inferred from the reduced severity of disease observed in patients with SCD or β thalassemia and persistence of higher concentration of HbF during adult life. This condition, deletional hereditary persistence of HbF (HPFH), is characterized by a pancellular synthesis of HbF with a milder sickling disorder and reduced or eliminated transfusion requirement (4). Hydroxyurea (HU) is currently the only drug approved by the FDA for the treatment of adult patients with moderate or severe SCD (5, 6). Other inducers of HbF synthesis, such as butyrate, an inhibitor of histone deacetylases (7), and more recently decitabine (5-aza-2′-deoxycitidine), a DNA-demethylating drug, have also been shown to successfully induce HbF in patients with SCD (8–12). Even though HU ameliorates acute complications and prolongs life expectancy in some patients with SCD (13), many patients fail to achieve clinically significant increases of HbF (14). Moreover, to date, these HbF inducers have shown only modest response in a majority of β thalassemia patients, most of whom continue to suffer from profound anemia (15–17).
Lenalidomide (CC-5013) and pomalidomide (CC-4047) are IMiD immunomodulatory drugs that have been described as having immunomodulatory properties and the ability to inhibit TNF-α production (18–20). Lenalidomide, a drug recently approved by the FDA under the commercial name of Revlimid, has shown reduction and elimination of the need for red blood–cell transfusions in some anemic myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients (21, 22). Pomalidomide is currently under evaluation for the treatment of hematological cancers (23). To better understand how the use of these drugs leads to transfusion independence, we investigated lenalidomide and pomalidomide’s effects on erythropoiesis and Hb synthesis using human CD34+ progenitor cells from normal and SCD patients as an in vitro erythropoiesis model.
The data presented here show that pomalidomide and lenalidomide can induce HbF expression in healthy and SCD CD34+–derived erythrocytes by regulating the transcription of γ- and β-globin genes. In addition, they have a synergistic effect, with HU increasing HbF in cells from healthy and SCD donors, suggesting that pomalidomide may represent an interesting new therapy to study in patients with SCD and β-hemoglobinopathies.
Pomalidomide and lenalidomide modulate human erythroid differentiation. We studied the effects of pomalidomide and lenalidomide on erythropoiesis in a 2-phase erythroid differentiation liquid culture assay using human BM CD34+ progenitor cells and monitored the expression of erythroid markers thrombospondin receptor (CD36), glycophorin A (CD235a) and transferring receptor (CD71) at different stages of erythroid differentiation. After 6 days, the majority of the cells (≥80%) cultured in the presence of vehicle control became erythroid, as characterized by the expression of cell-surface markers CD235a and CD71 (24) (Figure 1A). CD235a, a late marker of erythroid differentiation, was decreased with pomalidomide treatment and to a lower extent with lenalidomide (Figure 1, A and B). In contrast, CD71, an early marker of erythroid differentiation, was maintained at a high level (Figure 1, A and B). Moreover, we observed a 2-fold increase of the CD34+CD36+ immature erythroid progenitors when cells were cultured with 1 μM of pomalidomide (Figure 1C). Differentiation is often associated with a concomitant increase of apoptosis; similarly, it has been shown that the interaction between immature and mature erythroblasts contributes to inducing apoptosis during erythroid differentiation, where mature erythroblasts can activate programmed cell death of more immature ones (25–27). We observed a decrease in cell apoptosis with pomalidomide and lenalidomide (Figure 1D), as we would anticipate if differentiation were slowed down. This decrease in apoptosis was not associated with a decrease in cell number (Figure 1E).
Pomalidomide and lenalidomide modulate erythroid differentiation. Expanded human CD34+ cells were differentiated to the erythroid lineage in the presence of increasing concentrations of pomalidomide and lenalidomide for 6 days. (A) Surface expression of erythroid markers glycophorin A (CD235a) and transferrin receptor (CD71) was monitored by flow cytometry. (B and C) CD253a+CD71+ and CD34+CD36+ cells were monitored by flow cytometry. (D and E) Apoptosis and viability of cells cultured with increasing concentration of pomalidomide and lenalidomide were measured using ViaCount. Results are representative of 3 independent experiments.
Pomalidomide and lenalidomide are potent inducers of HbF during erythroid differentiation of human CD34+ progenitors. After the induction of erythroid differentiation for 6 days, total Hb levels were determined by ELISA assay. Figure 2A shows that pomalidomide and lenalidomide significantly increased in a dose-dependent manner Hb expression compared with vehicle control. We further investigated these compound effects on Hb production by monitoring the percentage of expression of fetal Hb (HbF) and adult Hb (HbA) in erythroid-differentiated cells (F cells) using flow cytometry. Pomalidomide and lenalidomide were able to significantly increase HbF expression in a dose- and time-dependent manner during erythropoiesis. Pomalidomide and lenalidomide at 10 μM increased 3-fold and 2-fold the percentage of HbF-containing cells as compared with vehicle control, respectively (Figure 2C). HbF upregulation induced by pomalidomide was observed as early as 2 days and increased in a time-dependent manner. After 9 days, HbF expression was not further increased but sustained (Figure 2B). Based on the HbF median effective concentration (EC50) values, defined as the log concentration of the drug that induces 50% of the maximal response, we found that pomalidomide is a more potent inducer of HbF than lenalidomide (0.08 μM vs. 1.9 μM, mean obtained from 22 and 11 donors, respectively; data not shown). The increase in HbF expression was associated with a slight decrease in HbA expression (Figure 2C), resulting in an increase of the HbF/HbA ratio. Figure 2D shows the distribution of HbF and HbA in erythroid cells, with both an increase of HbA+HbF+ double-positive population (55.9% with 30 μM of pomalidomide compared with 20.8% with control) and HbA–HbF+ single-positive population (7.21% with 30 μM pomalidomide compared with 0.13% with control). These results indicate that the number of F cells and their HbF content increase when erythroid cells are differentiated in the presence of increasing concentrations of pomalidomide.
Pomalidomide and lenalidomide increase HbF production in erythroid cells. (A) Quantification of total Hb production was done by ELISA assay after 6 days of erythroid differentiation. Values represent mean ± SEM (n = 3). (B) Expression of HbF was monitored by flow cytometry after 2, 6, 9, and 12 days of cell differentiation with 1 μM pomalidomide. (C and D) HbF and HbA were monitored after 6 days of cell differentiation, with increasing concentrations of pomalidomide. Scatter plots illustrate the distribution of HbF+ and HbA+ erythroid cells. The experiments were repeated on samples from at least 2 different donors with similar results. *P < 0.05.
We next measured the levels of γ- and β-globin mRNA at different stages of erythroid differentiation (days 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12) using quantitative real-time PCR to determine whether the regulation of HbF and HbA expression with pomalidomide was correlated with the increase of mRNA levels of γ- and β-globin. As shown in Figure 3, A and B, a time-dependent increase of γ- and β-globin mRNA levels was found with the vehicle control, which correlates with the erythrocyte differentiation. In addition, we found that pomalidomide at 1 μM enhanced γ-globin upregulation while decreasing β-globin expression. After 6 days, pomalidomide increased γ-globin mRNA levels 2-fold and decreased β-globin levels 2-fold (Figure 3, A and B).
Pomalidomide modulates the transcription of β-globin locus genes. (A and B) Expanded CD34+ cells were differentiated to the erythroid lineage for 12 days in the presence of 1 μM pomalidomide. Cells were harvested at different times of erythroid differentiation, total RNA was extracted, and γ-globin (A) and β-globin (B) expression were monitored by real-time PCR analysis using Taqman PCR probes for γ-globin and β-globin, respectively. The quantity of γ-globin and β-globin RNA obtained was normalized to the quantity of β-actin RNA. (C and D) Gγ globin, Aγ globin, and β levels of transcription were assayed by ChIP. After 1, 3, or 6 days of cell differentiation in the presence of vehicle control or pomalidomide at 10 μM, chromatin was immunoprecipitated using anti-RNA pol II. Results are expressed as enrichment of Gγ globin, Aγ globin, and β genes relative to the input DNA and are normalized to the results obtained with GAPDH-positive control. Values represent mean ± SEM (n = 3) and are representative of 2 independent experiments. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.001.
Pomalidomide modulates the transcription of γ- and β-globin genes. To determine whether the regulation of globin mRNA levels is transcription dependent, we analyzed the transcription rate of γ- and β-globin genes during the course of erythroid differentiation by measuring the occupancy of RNA polymerase II (RNA pol II) on the respective genes. Sandoval et al. have shown that ChIP using the RNA pol II was an effective method to measure the actual transcription rate of the gene of interest (28). RNA pol II ChIP shows an enrichment of Gγ globin and Aγ globin genes during erythrocyte differentiation, with a stronger effect with pomalidomide (2.5-fold increase for both Gγ globin and Aγ globin after 6 days of differentiation) compared with the vehicle control (Figure 3C). As anticipated, pomalidomide significantly decreased in a time-dependent manner β-globin gene transcription (3-fold decrease compared with vehicle control after 6 days of cell differentiation) (Figure 3D). These results indicate that pomalidomide modulates the transcription rate of γ- and β-globin genes observed during erythrocyte differentiation.
The regulation of γ- and β-globin by pomalidomide is correlated with the modification of epigenetic marks associated to β-globin locus. It has been shown that the switch between ε-, γ-, and β-globin expression during embryo, fetal, and adult life is highly regulated by chromatin remodeling (29–31). Because the increase of acetylation of histone H3 on lysine 9 and 14 has been described to be associated with the increase of transcription, the modification of histone acetylation was studied by analyzing the presence of histone H3 acetylated specifically on lysines 9 and 14 on the globin promoters (Gγ globin, Aγ globin, and β genes) and on the hypersensitive sites (HS), HS2 and HS3, of the LCR by ChIP. We found a modulation of histone H3 acetylation on the promoters of Gγ globin, Aγ globin, β, and the 2 HS analyzed when cells were differentiated toward erythrocytes in the presence of vehicle control (Figure 4, A and B). In the presence of pomalidomide, the acetylation of H3 was increased on Gγ globin and Aγ globin promoters and decreased on β promoter compared with vehicle control (Figure 4A). These results correlated well with those obtained for the transcription rate (Figure 3, B and C). The increase of acetylated H3 on HS2 and HS3 during cell differentiation was inhibited in the presence of pomalidomide (Figure 4B). These results suggest that pomalidomide affects the epigenetic marks in γ- and β-globin promoters as well as in the LCR. To determine whether pomalidomide modulates the level of acetylated histone H3 at the global level during the erythroid differentiation, purified histones from cells differentiated with vehicle control and pomalidomide for 3 and 6 days were analyzed by Western blot using anti-acetylated H3 antibody. As shown in Figure 4C, no significant difference between the compound and the vehicle control was detected after 3 and 6 days, indicating that pomalidomide only affects the acetylation of histone H3 on specific genes and does not modify global histone acetylation.
Pomalidomide modulates histone H3 acetylation on β-globin locus during erythroid differentiation of CD34+ cells. (A and B) CD34+ cells differentiated to the erythroid lineage in the presence of vehicle control or pomalidomide at 10 μM for 1 day, 3 days, or 6 days were subjected to ChIP using an anti-acetyl histone H3 K9 and K14 antibody and analyzed by RT-PCR using primers specific for Gγ globin, Aγ globin, and β promoters (A) and for LCR, HS2, and HS3 (B). Results are expressed as enrichment of genes of interest relative to the input DNA and are normalized to the results obtained with GAPDH-positive control. Values represent mean ± SEM (n = 3) and are representative of 2 independent experiments. (C) Acetylation of histone H3 on K9 and K14 was monitored by Western blot after 3 and 6 days of erythroid differentiation in the presence of vehicle control or pomalidomide at 10 μM. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.001.
Pomalidomide and lenalidomide are better HbF inducers than HU and butyrate in erythroid cells from healthy donors. To evaluate the efficacy of pomalidomide and lenalidomide in inducing HbF, we compared our compounds to other inducers of HbF that have been used in patients with SCD (Figure 5). The ex vivo evaluation of HbF expression by flow cytometry in erythroid cells after 6 days of differentiation with increasing concentrations of HU and butyrate shows that both drugs are less efficient inducers of HbF expression than pomalidomide and lenalidomide (Figure 5A). In the donor tested, the EC50 levels of pomalidomide and lenalidomide were 0.08 μM and 4 μM compared with more than 30 μM and 150 μM for HU and butyrate EC50, respectively. In all the donors tested, pomalidomide and lenalidomide increased in a dose-dependent manner the percentage of erythroid cells expressing HbF, but unlike HU and butyrate, cell viability was not affected (Figure 5B).
Pomalidomide and lenalidomide are more potent than HU and butyrate for inducing HbF expression in CD34-derived erythrocytes. (A) HbF expression was monitored by flow cytometry after 6 days of erythroid differentiation, with increasing concentration of pomalidomide, lenalidomide, HU, and butyrate. (B) Cell viability was monitored after 6 days by forward- and side-scattering intensity in dot plots. Results represent mean ± SEM (n = 3) and are representative of 3 independent experiments.
Pomalidomide and lenalidomide are synergistic with HU in increasing HbF expression during erythroid differentiation. Because both HU and pomalidomide increase HbF, we sought to assess whether a combined treatment would show additive or synergistic effects on our erythroid cell model. We found that the combination of HU and pomalidomide was synergistic in inducing HbF expression when concentrations of pomalidomide of 1 μM or 10 μM were combined to HU 10 μM (Figure 6, A and B) while only additive when lower concentrations of pomalidomide (0.1 μM) were used. To a lesser extent, we observed similar results with lenalidomide (Figure 6A). As shown in Figure 6B, the percentage of HbF expression and the MFI increased from 12.5% (MFI = 6355) for HU alone to 31.7% (MFI = 9049) for HU plus lenalidomide and 54.7% (MFI = 9717) for HU plus pomalidomide. This synergistic effect of pomalidomide and HU in vitro in 2 different donors provides further rationale to explore their use for combination therapy.
HU is synergistic with pomalidomide and lenalidomide in increasing HbF expression during erythroid differentiation. CD34+ cells were differentiated toward erythroid lineage in the presence of increasing concentrations of pomalidomide, lenalidomide, and HU at 10 μM alone or in combination. After 6 days, HbF expression was evaluated by flow cytometry. (A) Histograms of the percentage of cells expressing HbF in response to single or combination treatments are represented. (B) Histograms represent the MFI relative to the cell number. The experiments were repeated on samples from at least 2 different donors with similar results.
Pomalidomide and lenalidomide induce HbF in erythroid cells from SCD patients. To confirm that pomalidomide is able to induce HbF in erythroid cells from SCD patients, we studied its effect using CD34+ cells isolated from whole blood from 8 SCD donors. We found that pomalidomide and lenalidomide increased HbF expression in all 8 and 6 patient samples tested, respectively (Table 1). Similar to the results obtained with cells from healthy donors (Figure 6A), in the 8 samples tested, pomalidomide was a more efficient inducer of HbF than HU and equivalent or more potent than butyrate for the 6 donors tested. Pomalidomide induced HbF expression in a dose-dependent manner with a detectable increase at 0.001 μM of pomalidomide (Figure 7A). As demonstrated for normal cells, pomalidomide showed synergistic effects with HU in inducing HbF expression in CD34+ cells obtained from SCD patients differentiated toward erythrocytes (Figure 7B). The percentage of erythroid cells expressing HbF increased from 44.7% (pomalidomide, 0.1 μM, alone) to 64% (pomalidomide, 0.1 μM, combined with HU, 10 μM), while single treatment with 10 μM HU increased this percentage only slightly (22.3% in comparison with 18.6% in the vehicle control). Taken together, these results strongly suggest that pomalidomide is an HbF inducer, mechanistically different from HU and butyrate, and could offer additional benefits to patients with SCD and β thalassemia.
Effect of pomalidomide, lenalidomide, and other HbF inducers on HbF expression during erythroid differentiation of CD34+ cells from SCD patients. CD34+ cells were isolated from the PBMCs of SCD patients, expanded for 6 days, and differentiated to the erythroid lineage. (A) Expression of HbF was monitored by flow cytometry after 6 days of erythroid differentiation in the presence of increasing concentrations of pomalidomide, lenalidomide, HU, butyrate, and 5-azacytidine (SCD patient no. 5 is represented). Values represent mean ± SEM (n = 3). (B) Histograms of the percentage of cells expressing HbF in response to single or combination treatment with HU and pomalidomide from SCD patient no. 2 are represented. The experiments were repeated on samples from at least 2 different donors with similar results.
Percentage of HbF+ cells in response to HbF inducers in CD34+-derived erythrocytes from 8 SCD patients
This study demonstrates that, in addition to their known immunomodulatory properties (18, 19), pomalidomide and lenalidomide, 2 distinct IMiD immunomodulatory drugs, are potent regulators of erythropoiesis and Hb synthesis during erythroid differentiation (in vitro) with the ability to reactivate globin genes normally silenced during development, such as γ-globin. This property provides insights into the mechanism by which lenalidomide can improve Hb levels in patients with MDS and multiple myeloma and suggests that pomalidomide may be an innovative new therapy for SCD and β thalassemia.
The clinical outcome of SCD patients has improved considerably since the approval of HU for the treatment of SCD in 1998 (5). However, despite improvements in morbidity and mortality, HU is not beneficial for all patients (13, 14). Survival rates in the Multicenter Study of Hydroxyurea in Sickle Cell Anemia (MSH) trial were strongly correlated with the increase in HbF level (13, 14), confirming the importance of increasing and maintaining HbF levels for the treatment of SCD. The induction of HbF by HU is not entirely understood but is believed to be through a combination of its cytotoxicity, which causes erythroid regeneration, and a metabolic mechanism that leads to NO release (32). Beyond its effect on HbF, HU may have other beneficial effects in SCD and lessen the chance of vasoocclusive events by reducing the number of leukocytes and affecting their activation (33).
We sought to determine whether pomalidomide (currently under evaluation for the treatment of hematological cancers) and lenalidomide (Revlimid) could regulate erythropoiesis and Hb synthesis using an in vitro liquid culture model to differentiate human erythroid progenitors from BM or peripheral blood CD34+ cells. As previously described in the literature (34–38), this model produces large cultures of relatively pure and synchronized erythroid cell populations derived either from normal donors (BM CD34+ cells) or patients with SCD (whole-blood CD34+ cells) and allowed us to monitor the stage of erythroid differentiation and Hb production at multiple time points.
Our results show that pomalidomide is a potent inducer of HbF expression and modulates erythroid differentiation during the specific commitment of CD34+ progenitor cells toward the erythroid lineage. We observed that when erythroid progenitors were cultured with pomalidomide or lenalidomide, the level of glycophorin A, a marker that is expressed later during erythroid maturation, was diminished in comparison with vehicle control. By monitoring markers of various cell lineages, we discovered that the decrease in glycophorin A expression was not due to a shift to another lineage (data not shown) but was the result of an increase in the less mature erythroid population. Modulation of erythropoiesis by pomalidomide and lenalidomide was associated with an increase in both HbF and total Hb production, suggesting that this may be one mechanism by which lenalidomide increased Hb levels and abolished transfusion dependency in patients with MDS (21, 22, 39).
We observed an inverse relationship between HbF and HbA accumulation in erythroid cells in the in vitro model. Increases in the percentage of F cells ranged from 2- to 3-fold among the donors with a homogeneous distribution of HbF and an increase of HbF/HbA ratio that, in the context of SCD, should prevent the formation of the HbS polymer responsible for the sickling of erythrocytes (40).
Compared with HU, 5-azacytidine, and butyrate, pomalidomide is a strong inducer of HbF, producing twice the expression of HbF in our in vitro model. Unlike these other HbF inducers, pomalidomide and lenalidomide are not cytotoxic to the erythroid progenitors and actually reduced the number of erythroid-differentiated cells undergoing apoptosis. Verhelle et al. (41) also reported that pomalidomide and lenalidomide induce expansion of CD34+ cells with no reduction in total cell numbers, further supporting the concept that pomalidomide can expand the immature erythroid population and slow down the rate of cellular differentiation. The combination of stimulating erythropoiesis and increasing erythroid progenitor survival makes these drugs ideal candidates for the treatment of ineffective erythropoiesis observed in diseases like MDS and β-hemoglobinopathies. Pomalidomide is a more potent inducer of HbF expression (EC50 = 80 nM) than lenalidomide (EC50 = 1.9 μM). For both drugs, the concentration required to increase HbF expression by 2-fold corresponds to clinically achievable levels based upon plasma levels obtained after a single oral dose of pomalidomide and lenalidomide in healthy volunteers (42) and to well-tolerated doses in clinical studies. In addition, the combination of either pomalidomide or lenalidomide with HU is synergistic, supporting the notion that pomalidomide, either as a single agent or in combination with HU, may be efficacious in patients that do not respond to HU. This synergistic effect of certain IMiD immunomodulatory drugs with HU and the nontoxic effect of pomalidomide on erythroid progenitors are particularly relevant to the problem of HbF production in β thalassemia where HU, butyrate, and erythropoietin monotherapies have failed (43). Moreover, the ability of pomalidomide to increase the pool of immature erythroid progenitors is significant for β thalassemia treatment because one important factor in the anemia of β thalassemia is ineffective erythropoiesis, resulting in a large-scale destruction of red-cell precursors in the BM (44).
To further define the mechanism of action by which our drugs induce HbF expression, we studied the effect of pomalidomide on the regulation of β-globin genes. Considerable advances have been made in the understanding of globin gene switching during development and erythroid differentiation (9), in which transcription factors and chromatin-remodeling complexes play an important role in the control of globin genes (45–47). The β-globin LCR upstream of the globin structural genes (ε, Gγ globin, Aγ globin, δ, and β) that consists of 5 DNAse 1 HS is needed for globin gene transcription. During differentiation, the promoters of human β-globin genes undergo an extensive chromatin remodeling accompanied by modification of histone H3 acetylation (31, 48). In this study, we showed that pomalidomide increases γ-globin mRNA and decreases β-globin mRNA after 3 days of erythroid differentiation (Figures 3A and 5B). These changes correlated with modulation of transcription rates due to increased and decreased RNA pol II binding to the γ-globin and β-globin gene promoters respectively (Figure 3, C and D). Pomalidomide did not increase α-globin gene expression (data not shown). This finding is of interest in β thalassemia, as an increase in α-globin gene expression could counteract the increase in γ-globin gene expression and reduce the beneficial effect of the increase of γ-globin expression on chain imbalance (49, 50). Coinheritance of α thalassemia mutations in patients with β thalassemia has been associated with a milder clinical course because of a less severe inbalance in α-β chain (51).
Histone deacetylase inhibitors like sodium butyrate have been shown to induce HbF synthesis in vitro and in humans (8, 17, 52–54), in part through their ability to induce histone hyperacetylation. We hypothesized that pomalidomide could regulate HbF by modifying chromatin structure. Indeed, pomalidomide selectively increased by more than 2-fold the level of histone H3 acetylated on K9 and K14 at the γ-globin promoter. This effect appeared to be specific, since no effect on the global levels of H3 acetylation in cells was found (Figure 4, A and C). The mechanism of how this occurs is not clearly understood. However, it could be due to a regulation of the recruitment of coactivator and corepressor complexes. Interestingly, the chromatin organization of different HS (i.e., increased level of HS2 and HS3 acetylation) within the LCR has been reported to be differentially modulated during erythroid differentiation of hematopoietic progenitor cells (31). The analysis of histone modification at 2 different HS (HS2, HS3) showed that pomalidomide induced a decrease of acetylated histone H3 on HS2 and HS3 during erythroid maturation, supporting the observation that erythroid cells differentiated in the presence of pomalidomide are less mature. These observations suggest that epigenetic changes taking place during erythroid differentiation are modulated by certain IMiD immunomodulatory drugs and can explain, at least in part, the reactivation of γ-globin gene expression in human erythroid cells.
Strong epidemiological and clinical evidence that higher HbF levels and a pancellular distribution of HbF ameliorate clinical complications of SCD has provided a solid rationale for the development of new inducers of HbF (55, 56). Other moderating factors in conjunction with HbF determine the beneficial effect of HU in SCD; the effect of HU on neutrophil counts may limit the extent of tissue destruction and pain during vasoocclusive events, underlying that both factors, increase in HbF levels and decrease of leukocytosis, have a role in lowering the crisis rate in SCD. To support the potential of pomalidomide as a new drug for SCD, we confirmed the strong induction of HbF in erythroid progenitor cells obtained from the peripheral blood of patients with SCD. Moreover, the combination of pomalidomide with HU at suboptimal noncytotoxic concentrations was synergistic in increasing the level of HbF. Pomalidomide as a monotherapy and/or combination therapy with HU in SCD could minimize toxicity arising from unnecessary dose escalation of HU.
Our results support the hypothesis that pomalidomide, alone or in combination with current approved therapies, can augment HbF synthesis, increasing the ratio of HbF to HbA, and restore effective erythropoiesis. In addition, pomalidomide has the ability to inhibit TNF-α production and other inflammatory cytokines and could help reduce the chronic inflammation in sickle-cell patients, thus reducing or preventing clinical complications associated with SCD. This work suggests that pomalidomide represents a novel drug worthy of additional study for SCD and β thalassemia and perhaps certain other diseases associated with ineffective erythropoiesis.
Materials. Pomalidomide and lenalidomide (Celgene Corp.) were dissolved in DMSO (final concentration, 0.1%). HU, 5-azacytidine, and sodium butyrate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. All controls contained 0.1% of DMSO and are referred as vehicle control. CD34-PE, CD36-FITC, CD71-FITC, CD235a-PE, and HbF-PE antibodies were from BD Biosciences — Pharmingen. HbA-FITC antibody was purchased from PerkinElmer (Wallac). The growth factors SCF, Epo, Flt3-L, and IL-3 were purchased from Biosource International. Drug-respective EC50 was calculated from concentration-response curve, with HbF EC50 defined as the log concentration of the drug that induces 50% of the maximal response (maximal response was defined by pomalidomide percentage of HbF expression at 10 μM).
Cell culture. BM CD34+ cells were purchased from Cambrex. Peripheral blood samples were collected from patients with SCD undergoing routine venipuncture or monthly red cell exchange after obtaining their informed consent. Collection of blood from SCD patients was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Loma Linda University Medical Center. SCD CD34+ cells, obtained from patients, were purified using Ficoll-Paque (GE Healthcare) and CD34+ microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. BM and SCD CD34+ cells were cultured in Iscove’s MDM with BIT 95000 (StemCell Technologies) in the presence of growth factors. Cells were differentiated toward the erythroid lineage using a 2-phase liquid culture model. During the first 6 days (first phase), CD34+ cells were expanded with SCF (100 ng/ml), Flt3-L (100 ng/ml), and IL-3 (20 ng/ml). Expanded cells were then committed and differentiated toward the erythroid lineage (second phase) with Epo (2 U/ml) and SCF (50 ng/ml) in the presence of the indicated concentration of drugs. BM CD34+ cells were used in all experiments with healthy donors. Peripheral blood CD34+ cells were used in all experiments with patients with SCD.
Flow cytometry: phenotypic characterization of the cells. At different times of erythroid differentiation, the expression of cell-surface antigens was analyzed by flow cytometry (FACSaria; BD Biosciences — Pharmingen). Cells were processed for double staining (30 minutes at 4°C) using FITC- and PE-conjugated monoclonal antibodies. Antibodies used were CD34-PE, CD36-FITC, CD71-FITC, and CD235a-PE from BD Biosciences — Pharmingen.
Flow cytometry: immunofluorescence staining for HbF and HbA. Cells were washed with PBS, fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with cytopermeafix (BD Biosciences — Pharmingen), stained with HbF-PE (BD Biosciences — Pharmingen) and HbA-FITC (PerkinElmer), and analyzed by flow cytometry (FACSaria or FACSArray; BD Biosciences — Pharmingen) and FlowJo cytometry software (Tree Star).
Cell viability. Cell count and viability of erythroid cells were determined after 6 days of erythroid differentiation according to Guava ViaCount reagent protocol and software (Guava Technologies).
ELISA. Hb production in erythroid cells was measured by ELISA using a human Hb ELISA quantitation kit from Bethyl Laboratories. In brief, cells were harvested after 6 days of erythroid differentiation, and quantitative measure of Hb production was determined by sandwich ELISA using anti-Hb antibodies according to the manufacturer’s instruction.
Real-time PCR. At the indicated times, total RNAs were purified from CD34+-derived erythroid cells using RNeasy Kit (QIAGEN). Reverse-transcription PCR from 100 ng total RNA was performed using the Superscript III One-Step Quantitative PCR Reagent System (Invitrogen) and Taqman PCR probes specific for the gene of interest (Applied Biosystems) according to standard methods. The quantity of product obtained was calculated using the standard curve predetermined and normalized to β actin.
RNA pol II ChIP assays. ChIP assays were carried out by Genpathway Inc., as described in Labhart et al. (57). Gγ globin, Aγ globin, and β genes were assayed for their levels of transcription using Genpathway’s TranscriptionPath Query assay. Chromatin was immunoprecipitated using anti-RNA pol II (Abcam) and then quantified by quantitative real-time PCR (Q-PCR) reactions containing SYBR Green (Bio-Rad). Experimental Q-PCR values were expressed relative to a DNA standard curve and were also normalized against values obtained using input (unprecipitated) DNA and the same primer sets and to the values obtained with GAPDH primer sets. Error bars represent SDs calculated from triplicate Q-PCR determinations.
Acetyl H3 K9 and K14 ChIP assays. The modification of histone H3 acetylation was assayed using Genpathway’s FactorPath Query assay. Assays were carried out as described for TranscriptionPath, except immunoprecipitation was carried out using the acetyl H3 K9 and K14 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) and primers used were chosen in the proximal promoter regions of Gγ globin, β, HS3, and HS2.
Isolation of histones. Cells (5 × 106) were harvested by centrifugation at 2000 g for 5 minutes at 4°C, washed twice with cold PBS, resuspended in 1 ml lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.5, 50 mM sodium bisulfite, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM sodium butyrate, 8.6% sucrose, 1% Triton X-100) and homogenized in a Dounce homogenizer. Nuclei were isolated by centrifugation at 1000 g for 5 minutes at 4°C and the pellet washed with 500 μl of suspension buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 13 mM EDTA). The pellet was then resuspended in 125 μl ice-cold, sterile, distilled water, and histones were extracted from the nuclei with the addition of sulfuric acid to a final concentration of 0.4 N for 1 hour in ice. Insoluble particles were removed by centrifugation at 10,000 g for 5 minutes at 4°C. Histones were precipitated from the supernatant with addition of 10 vol of acetone, placed at –20°C overnight, and collected by centrifugation at 10,000 g for 5 minutes at 4°C. Pellets were dried using a vacuum and resuspended with 30 μl of water.
Western blot analysis of histone H3 acetylation. 10 μg of histones were separated on 4%–20% Tris-Glycine gel (Invitrogen) and blotted onto nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was incubated with acetylated histone H3 K9 and K14 antibody and visualized using an ECL kit (GE Healthcare) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The membrane was then stripped and blotted with histone H3 antibody.
Statistics. Comparison between different parameters evaluated in this study and vehicle controls were made by the 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t test, assuming that the variance of the drug and vehicle control may be different. P < 0.05 was considered significant, and P < 0.001 was considered very significant.
We thank Laure Escoubet-Lozach for her assistance with the globin probes selection and statistical analysis.
Address correspondence to: Laure A. Moutouh-de Parseval, Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, New Jersey 07901, USA. Phone: (908) 673-9330; Fax: (908) 673-2774; E-mail: ldeparse@celgene.com.
Nonstandard abbreviations used: EC50, median effective concentration; Hb, hemoglobin; HbA, adult Hb; HbF, fetal Hb; HbS, sickle-cell Hb; HS, hypersensitive site(s); HU, hydroxyurea; LCR, locus control region; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; RNA pol II, RNA polymerase II; SCD, sickle-cell disease.
Conflict of interest: L.A. Moutouh-de Parseval, D. Verhelle, E. Glezer, K. Jensen-Pergakes, G.D. Ferguson, L.G. Corral, G. Muller, H. Brady, and K. Chan have received income and research support from and have stock in Celgene Corporation.
Reference information: J. Clin. Invest.118:248–258 (2008). doi:10.1172/JCI32322