skip to main content
10.1145/259963.260531acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Usability inspection methods

Published:28 April 1994Publication History

ABSTRACT

No abstract available.

References

  1. 1.Ackerman, A. E, Buchwald, L. S., and Lewski, E H. (1989). Software inspections: An effective verification process. IEEE Software 6, 3 (May), 31-36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Bell, B. (1992). Using programming walkthroughs to design a visual language. Technical Report CU-CS-581-92 (Ph.D. Thesis), University of Colorado, Boulder, CO. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Bias, R. (1991). Walkthroughs: Efficient collaborative testing. 1EEE Software 8, 5 (September), 94-95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Bias, R. G. (1994). The pluralistic usability walkthrough: Coordinated empathies, in Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 65-78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Desurvire, H. W. (1994). Faster, cheaper!! Are usability inspection methods as effective as empirical testing? In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 173-202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.Desurvire, H. W., Kondziela, J. M., and Atwood, M. E. (1992). What is gained and lost when using evaluation methods other than empirical testing. In Monk, A., Diaper, D., and Harrison, M.D. (Eds.), People and Computers VII, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 89-102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Fagan, M.E. (1986). Advances in software inspection. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 12, 7 (July), 744- 751. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Jeffries, R., Miller, J.R., Wharton, C., and Uyeda, K.M. (1991). User interface evaluation in the real world: A comparison of four techniques. Proc. ACM CHI'91 Conf. (New Orleans, LA, April 28 - May 2), 119-124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Kahn, M. J., and Prail, A. (1994). Formal usability inspections. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R.L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, Johrn Wiley & Sons, New York, 141-172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Karat, C. (1994). Comparison of user interface evaluation methods. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R.L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 203- 232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.Karat, C., Campbell, R. and Fiegel, T. (1992). Comparison of empirical testing and walkthrough methods in user interface evaluation. In Proceedings of CHI'92 (Monterey, California, May 3-7, 1992), ACM, New York, 397-404. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.Lewis, C., Poison, P., Wharton, C., and Rieman, J. (t 990). Testing a walkthrough methodology for theory-based design of walk-up-and-use interfaces. Proc. ACM CHI' 90 Conf. (Seattle, WA, April 1-5), 235-242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.Mack, R. L., and Montaniz, F. (1994). Observing, predicting and analyzing usability problems, in Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 293-336. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.Mack, R. L., and Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability inspection methods. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 25, 1 (January), 28-33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.Molich, R., and Nielsen, J. (1990). Improving a humancomputer dialogue. Comm. ACM 33, 3 (March), 338-348. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.Nielsen, J. (1989). Usability engineering at a discount. In Salvendy, G., and Smith, M.J. (Eds.), Designing and Using Human-Computer Interfaces and Knowledge Based Systems. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 394-401. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.Nielsen, J. (1990). Paper versus computer implementations as mockup scenarios for heuristic evaluation. Proc. IFIP INTERACT' 90 Third Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Cambridge, U.K., August 27-31), 315-320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.Nielsen, J. (1990). Traditional dialogue design applied to modem user interfaces. Communications of the ACM 33, 10 (October), 109-118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.Nielsen, J. (1992). The usability engineering life cycle. IEEE Computer 25, 3 (March), 12-22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.Nielsen, J. (1992). Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation. Proc. CHI'92 Conf. (Monterey, CA, May 3-7), ACM, New York, 373-380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering, Academic Press, Boston, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. 22.Nielsen, J. (1994). Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. Proc. A CM CHI'94 Conf. (Boston, MA, April 24-28). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23.Nielsen, J. (1994). Heuristic evaluation, in Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 25--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24.Nielsen, J. (1994). Scenarios in discount usability engineering. in Carroll, J. M. (Ed.), Scenario Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology. Book under preparation. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. 25.Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.) (1994). Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. 26.Nielsen, J., and Landauer, T. K. (1993). A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. Proc. ACM INTER CHI' 93 Conf. (Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 24-29 April), 206-213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. 27.Nielsen, J. and Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. Proc. ACM CHI'90 Conf. (Seattle, WA, April 1- 5), 249 - 256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. 28.Nielsen, J., and Phillips, V. L. (1993). Estimating the relative usability of two interfaces: Heuristic, formal, and empirical methods compared. Proc. ACM INTERCHI'93 Conf. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, April 24--29), 214-221. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. 29.Poison. P. Lewis, C. Rieman. J., and W2aarton, C. (1992). Cognitive walkthroughs: A method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. International Journal of Man- Machine Studies, 36, 5, 741-773. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. 30.Wharton, C., Rieman, J., Lewis, C,, and Poison, P. (1994). The cognitive walkthrough method: A practitioner's guide. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 105-140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. 31.Wixon, D., Jones, S., Tse, L., and Casaday, G. (1994). Inspections and design reviews: Framework, history, and reflection. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R.L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 79-1 04. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. Usability inspection methods

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '94: Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 1994
      483 pages
      ISBN:0897916514
      DOI:10.1145/259963

      Copyright © 1994 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 April 1994

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader