ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
- 1.Ackerman, A. E, Buchwald, L. S., and Lewski, E H. (1989). Software inspections: An effective verification process. IEEE Software 6, 3 (May), 31-36. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 2.Bell, B. (1992). Using programming walkthroughs to design a visual language. Technical Report CU-CS-581-92 (Ph.D. Thesis), University of Colorado, Boulder, CO. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3.Bias, R. (1991). Walkthroughs: Efficient collaborative testing. 1EEE Software 8, 5 (September), 94-95. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4.Bias, R. G. (1994). The pluralistic usability walkthrough: Coordinated empathies, in Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 65-78. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 5.Desurvire, H. W. (1994). Faster, cheaper!! Are usability inspection methods as effective as empirical testing? In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 173-202. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6.Desurvire, H. W., Kondziela, J. M., and Atwood, M. E. (1992). What is gained and lost when using evaluation methods other than empirical testing. In Monk, A., Diaper, D., and Harrison, M.D. (Eds.), People and Computers VII, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 89-102. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7.Fagan, M.E. (1986). Advances in software inspection. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 12, 7 (July), 744- 751. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8.Jeffries, R., Miller, J.R., Wharton, C., and Uyeda, K.M. (1991). User interface evaluation in the real world: A comparison of four techniques. Proc. ACM CHI'91 Conf. (New Orleans, LA, April 28 - May 2), 119-124. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 9.Kahn, M. J., and Prail, A. (1994). Formal usability inspections. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R.L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, Johrn Wiley & Sons, New York, 141-172. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10.Karat, C. (1994). Comparison of user interface evaluation methods. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R.L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 203- 232. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11.Karat, C., Campbell, R. and Fiegel, T. (1992). Comparison of empirical testing and walkthrough methods in user interface evaluation. In Proceedings of CHI'92 (Monterey, California, May 3-7, 1992), ACM, New York, 397-404. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.Lewis, C., Poison, P., Wharton, C., and Rieman, J. (t 990). Testing a walkthrough methodology for theory-based design of walk-up-and-use interfaces. Proc. ACM CHI' 90 Conf. (Seattle, WA, April 1-5), 235-242. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13.Mack, R. L., and Montaniz, F. (1994). Observing, predicting and analyzing usability problems, in Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 293-336. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 14.Mack, R. L., and Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability inspection methods. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 25, 1 (January), 28-33. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 15.Molich, R., and Nielsen, J. (1990). Improving a humancomputer dialogue. Comm. ACM 33, 3 (March), 338-348. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16.Nielsen, J. (1989). Usability engineering at a discount. In Salvendy, G., and Smith, M.J. (Eds.), Designing and Using Human-Computer Interfaces and Knowledge Based Systems. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 394-401. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 17.Nielsen, J. (1990). Paper versus computer implementations as mockup scenarios for heuristic evaluation. Proc. IFIP INTERACT' 90 Third Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Cambridge, U.K., August 27-31), 315-320. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 18.Nielsen, J. (1990). Traditional dialogue design applied to modem user interfaces. Communications of the ACM 33, 10 (October), 109-118. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 19.Nielsen, J. (1992). The usability engineering life cycle. IEEE Computer 25, 3 (March), 12-22. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 20.Nielsen, J. (1992). Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation. Proc. CHI'92 Conf. (Monterey, CA, May 3-7), ACM, New York, 373-380. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 21.Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering, Academic Press, Boston, MA. Google ScholarCross Ref
- 22.Nielsen, J. (1994). Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. Proc. A CM CHI'94 Conf. (Boston, MA, April 24-28). Google ScholarDigital Library
- 23.Nielsen, J. (1994). Heuristic evaluation, in Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 25--64. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 24.Nielsen, J. (1994). Scenarios in discount usability engineering. in Carroll, J. M. (Ed.), Scenario Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology. Book under preparation. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 25.Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.) (1994). Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 26.Nielsen, J., and Landauer, T. K. (1993). A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. Proc. ACM INTER CHI' 93 Conf. (Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 24-29 April), 206-213. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 27.Nielsen, J. and Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. Proc. ACM CHI'90 Conf. (Seattle, WA, April 1- 5), 249 - 256. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 28.Nielsen, J., and Phillips, V. L. (1993). Estimating the relative usability of two interfaces: Heuristic, formal, and empirical methods compared. Proc. ACM INTERCHI'93 Conf. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, April 24--29), 214-221. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 29.Poison. P. Lewis, C. Rieman. J., and W2aarton, C. (1992). Cognitive walkthroughs: A method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. International Journal of Man- Machine Studies, 36, 5, 741-773. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 30.Wharton, C., Rieman, J., Lewis, C,, and Poison, P. (1994). The cognitive walkthrough method: A practitioner's guide. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 105-140. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 31.Wixon, D., Jones, S., Tse, L., and Casaday, G. (1994). Inspections and design reviews: Framework, history, and reflection. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R.L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 79-1 04. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Usability inspection methods
Recommendations
Usability inspection methods: report on a workshop held at CHI'92, Monterey, CA, May 3–4, 1992
Usability inspection methods, based on informed intuition s about interface design quality, hold promise of providing faster, more cost-effective ways to generate usability evaluations, compared to empirical user evaluation methods . Examples of ...
Perspective-based Usability Inspection: An Empirical Validationof Efficacy
Inspection is a fundamental means of achieving software usability. Past research showed that the current usability inspection techniques were rather ineffective. We developed perspective-based usability inspection, which divides the large variety of ...
Comments