Davide Gianfelice
ABSTRACT
In the last few years University of Turin and CIRSFID University of Bologna collaborated to pair NLP techniques and legal knowledge to detect modificatory provisions in normative texts. Annotating these modifications is a relevant and interesting problem, in that modifications affect the whole normative system; and legal language, though more regular than unrestricted language, is sometimes particularly convoluted, and poses specific linguistic issues. This paper focuses on two major aspects. First, we explore a combination between parsing and regular expressions; to the best of our knowledge, such hybrid strategy has never been proposed before to tackle the problem at hand. Secondly, we significantly extend past works coverage (basically focussed on substitution, integration and repeal modifications) in order to account for further twelve modification kinds. For the sake of conciseness, we fully illustrate and discuss only few modification types that are more relevant and interesting: suspension, prorogation of efficacy, postponement of efficacy and exception/derogation. These sorts of modifications appear particularly challenging, in that modifications in these categories make use of similar linguistic speech acts and verbs, and exhibit strong similarities in the linguistic syntactical patterns, to such an extent that to discern them is difficult for the legal expert, too. We describe the implemented system and report about an extensive experimentation on the new modificatory provisions. Results are discussed in order to improve both system's accuracy and annotation practice.
- G. Ajani, G. Boella, L. Lesmo, A. Mazzei, D. P. Radicioni, and P. Rossi. Legal Taxonomy Syllabus: Handling Multilevel Legal Ontologies. In Proceedings of Langtech 2008, Rome, Italy, 2008.Google Scholar
- T. Arnold-Moore. Automatically processing amendments to legislation. In ICAIL, pages 297--306, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Arnold-Moore. Automatic generation of amendment legislation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL), pages 56--62, 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Biagioli, E. Francesconi, A. Passerini, S. Montemagni, and C. Soria. Automatic semantics extraction in law documents. In ICAIL '05: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, pages 133--140, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Biagioli, E. Francesconi, P. Spinosa, and M. Taddei. The NIR project: Standards and tools for legislative drafting and legal document web publication. In Proceedings of ICAIL Workshop on e-Government:Modelling Norms and Concepts as Key Issues, pages 69--78, 2003.Google Scholar
- N. Bobbio. Teoria generale del diritto. Giappichelli, Torino, 1971.Google Scholar
- A. Bolioli, L. Dini, P. Mercatali, and F. Romano. For the Automated Mark-up of Italian Legislative Texts in XML. In T. Bench-Capon, A. Daskalopulu, and R. Winkels, editors, Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Proceedings of Jurix 2002: The Fifteenth Annual Conference. IOS Press, 2002.Google Scholar
- C. Bosco, S. Montemagni, A. Mazzei, V. Lombardo, F. Dell'Orletta, and A. Lenci. Evalita'09 parsing task: comparing dependency parsers and treebanks. In Proceedings of Evalita'09, Reggio Emilia, Italy, 2009.Google Scholar
- M. Cherubini, G. Giardiello, S. Marchi, S. Montemagni, P. Spinosa, and G. Venturi. NLP-based metadata annotation of textual amendments. In Proceedings of Workshop on Legislative XML 2008, Jurix, 2008.Google Scholar
- E. de Maat, R. Winkels, and T. M. van Engers. Automated Detection of Reference Structures in Law. In T. M. van Engers, editor, Proceedings of the JURIX 2006 on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: The Nineteenth Annual Conference, pages 41--50, Amsterdam, 2006. IOS Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. J. Fillmore. Scenes-and-frames semantics. In A. Zampolli, editor, Linguistic Structures Processing, pages 55--79. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1977.Google Scholar
- C. J. Fillmore and C. F. Baker. Frame Semantics for Text Understanding. In Proceedings of WordNet and Other Lexical Resources Workshop, NAACL, Pittsburgh, June 2001.Google Scholar
- G. Forman. An extensive empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:1289--1305, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Francesconi and A. Passerini. Automatic classification of provisions in legislative texts. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 15(1):1--17, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Guastini. Teoria e dogmatica delle fonti. Giuffrè, Milan, Italy, 1998.Google Scholar
- E. Hovy. Text summarization. In R. Mitkov, editor, The Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics, Oxford Handbooks in Linguistics, chapter 32, pages 583--598. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003.Google Scholar
- L. Lesmo. The Rule-Based Parser of the NLP Group of the University of Torino. Intelligenza Artificiale, 2(4):46--47, June 2007.Google Scholar
- L. Lesmo, A. Mazzei, M. Palmirani, and D. P. Radicioni. TULSI: an NLP System for Extracting Legal Modificatory Provisions. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 12(4):1--34, 2012.Google Scholar
- C. Lupo, F. Vitali, E. Francesconi, M. Palmirani, R. Winkels, E. de Maat, A. Boer, and P. Mascellani. General XML format(s) for legal Sources - ESTRELLA European Project. Deliverable 3.1, Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007.Google Scholar
- A. Mazzei, D. Radicioni, and R. Brighi. NLP-based Extraction of Modificatory Provisions Semantics. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL09, pages 50--57, Barcelona, Spain, June 2009. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Ogawa, S. Inagaki, and K. Toyama. Automatic consolidation of japanese statutes based on formalization of amendment sentences. In Proceedings of the 2007 conference on New frontiers in artificial intelligence, JSAI'07, pages 363--376, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Palmirani and R. Brighi. An XML Editor for Legal Information Management. In R. Traunmüller, editor, Electronic Government, volume 2739 of LNCS, pages 421--429, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2003. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- M. Palmirani and R. Brighi. Time model for managing the dynamic of normative system. Electronic Government, pages 207--218, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Palmirani and R. Brighi. Model regularity of legal language in active modifications. In AICOL Workshops, pages 54--73, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Palmirani, R. Brighi, and M. Massini. Processing Normative References on the Basis of Natural Language Questions. In DEXA '04 Proceedings of the Database and Expert Systems Applications, 15th International Workshop, pages 9--12. IEEE Computer Society, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Robaldo, L. Lesmo, and D. P. Radicioni. Compiling Regular Expressions to Extract Legal Modifications. In B. Schafer, editor, Proceedings of the The 25th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2012. IOS Press.Google Scholar
- S. Rodotà. Clausole e principi generali nell'argomentazione giurisprudenziale degli anni novanta, chapter La tecnica legislativa per clausole generali in Italia. Cedam, Padova, 1998.Google Scholar
- R. Sacco. Lingua e diritto. Ars Interpretandi, 5, 2000.Google Scholar
- M. T. Sagri and D. Tiscornia. Le peculiarità del linguaggio giuridico. Problemi e prospettive nel contesto multilingue europeo. mediAzioni, 7, 2009.Google Scholar
- J. Saias and P. Quaresma. A Methodology to Create Legal Ontologies in a Logic Programming Based Web Information Retrieval System. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 12(4):397--417, 2004.Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Soria, R. Bartolini, A. Lenci, S. Montemagni, and V. Pirrelli. Automatic Extraction of Semantics in Law Documents. In C. Biagioli, E. Francesconi, and G. Sartor, editors, Proceedings of the V Legislative XML Workshop, pages 253--266. European Press Academic Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar
- P. Spinosa, G. Giardiello, M. Cherubini, S. Marchi, G. Venturi, and S. Montemagni. Nlp-based metadata extraction for legal text consolidation. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL '09, pages 40--49, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Modificatory provisions detection: a hybrid NLP approach
Recommendations
NLP-based extraction of modificatory provisions semantics
ICAIL '09: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and LawIn this paper we illustrare a research based on NLP techniques aimed at automatically annotate modificatory provisions. We propose an approach which pairs deep syntactic parsing with rule-based shallow semantic analysis relying on a fine-grained ...
Applying automatic text-based detection of deceptive language to police reports
VeriPol is an effective text-based lie detection model for police reports.Our model includes feature selection by L1 penalization and heuristic rules.Computational experiments on a real dataset show a validation accuracy of 91.A pilot study shows a ...
Extracting value from Brazilian Court decisions
AbstractWe propose a methodology to extract value from Brazilian Court decisions to support judges and lawyers in their decision-making. We instantiate our methodology in one information system we have developed. Such system (i) extracts ...
Highlights- The Brazilian legal system has seen an increase of the case law in the last years.
Comments