skip to main content
article

Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources

Published:01 July 2001Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

There has been considerable research on the factors that predict whether individuals will accept and voluntarily use information systems. The technology acceptance model (TAM) has a base in psychological research, is parsimonious, explains usage behavior quite well, and can be operationalized with valid and reliable instruments. A limitation of TAM is that it assumes usage is volitional, that is, there are no barriers that would prevent an individual from using an IS if he or she chose to do so. This research extends TAM by adding perceived user resources to the model, with careful attention to placing the construct in TAM's existing nomological structure. In contrast to measures of self-efficacy and perceived behavioral control that concentrate on how well individuals perceive they can execute specific courses of action, this paper examines perceptions of adequate resources that can facilitate or inhibit such behaviors. The inclusion of both a formative and reflective set of measures provides the opportunity for the researcher and manager to decide whether to evaluate only the overall perceptions of adequate resources or also the specific underlying causes. The extended model incorporating these measures was then tested in the field. The results confirmed that perceived user resources is a valuable addition to the model.

References

  1. Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., and Todd, P. A. (1992). "Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 16, pp. 227-247. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). "The Theory of Planned Behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, pp. 179-211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ajzen, I., and Madden, T.J. (1986). "Prediction of Goal-Directed Behavior: Attitudes, Intentions and Perceived Behavioral Control," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 22, pp. 453-474.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Amoroso, D. L., and Cheney, P. H. (1992). "Quality End User Developed Applications: Some Essential Ingredients,: Data Base, Vol. 23, pp. 1-11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. (1990). "Trying to Consume," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 17, pp. 127-140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bailey, J. E., and Pearson, S. W. (1983) "Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction," Management Science, Vol. 29, pp. 530-544.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bandura, A. (1977). "Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change," Psychological Review, Vol. 84, pp. 191-215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Bandura, A. (1982). "Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency," American Psychologist, Vol. 37, pp. 122-147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Barki, H. (1990). "Determinants of User Satisfaction Judgments in Information Systems," Proceedings of the 23rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 4, January, pp. 408-417.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Blalock, Jr., H. M., (1984). Basic Dilemmas in the Social Sciences, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Bollen, K. A. (1984). "Multiple Indicators: Internal Consistency or No Necessary Relationship?," Quality and Quantity, Vol. 18, pp. 377-385.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Campbell, D. T., and Fiske, D. W. (1959). "Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix," Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 56, pp. 81-105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Cheney, P,. and Dickson, G. (1982). "Organizational Characteristics and Information Systems: An Exploratory Investigation," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 25, pp. 170-184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Chin, W. W. (1996). "The Measurement and Meaning of IT Usage: Reconciling Recent Discrepancies Between Self Reported and Computer Recorded Usage," Proceedings of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada, Information Systems Division, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, pp. 65-74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Chin, W. W. (1998a). "Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. vii - xvi. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Chin, W. W. (1998b). "The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling," in G.A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 295-336.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Chin, W. W., and Gopal, A. (1995). "Adoption Intention in GSS: Relative Importance of Beliefs," DATA BASE, Vol. 26, pp. 42-63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Chin, W. W., and Newsted, P. R. (1999). "Structural Equation Modeling Analysis with Small Samples Using Partial Least Squares," in R. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research, Sage Publications, pp. 307-341.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Churchill, G. A. (1979). "A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16, pp. 64-73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Churchill, G. A., Ford, N. M., and Walker, Jr., O. C. (1974). "Measuring the Satisfaction of Industrial Salesmen," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 11, pp. 254-60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Cohen, P., Cohen, J., Teresi, J., Marchi, M., and Velez, C. N. (1990). "Problems in the Measurement of Latent Variables in Structural Equations Causal Models," Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 14, pp. 183-196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis For The Behavioral Sciences, (2nd edition), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Compeau, D. R., and Higgins, C. A. (1995). "Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, pp. 189-211. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Conrath, D., and Mignen, O. (1990). "What Is Being Done to Measure User Satisfaction with EDP/MIS," Information and Management, Vol. 19, pp. 7-19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Davis, F. D. (1989). "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and End User Acceptance of In-formation Technology," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, pp. 318-339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. (1989). "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, Vol. 35, pp. 982-1003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Doll, W. J., and Ahmed, M. U. (1983). "Managing User Expectations," Journal of Systems Management, Vol. 34, pp. 6-11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Fuerst, W. L., and Cheney, P. H. (1982). "Factors Affecting the Perceived Utilization of Computer-Based Decision Support Systems In the Oil Industry," Decision Sciences, Vol. 13, pp. 554-569.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Gallagher, C. A. (1974). "Perceptions of the Value of a Management Information System," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 46-55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Goodhue, D. L. (1986). "IS Attitudes: Towards Theoretical Definition and Measurement Clarity," Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information Systems, San Diego, CA, December, pp. 181-194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Goodhue, D. L., and Thompson, R. L. (1995). "Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, pp. 213-236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Hair, Jr., J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate Data Analysis, (4th edition), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Hartwick, J., and Barki, H. (1994). "Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use," Management Science, Vol. 40, pp. 440-465. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Hill, T., Smith, N. D., and Mann, M. F. (1987). "Role of Efficacy Expectations in Predicting the Decision to Use Advanced Technologies: The Case of Computers," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 72, pp. 307-313.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Institute of Management Accountants, (1995-96). Directory, Montvale, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Ives, B., Olson, M. H., and Baroudi, J. J. (1983). "The Measurement of User Satisfaction," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 26, pp. 785-793. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. La Du, T. J., and Tanaka, J. S. (1995). "Incremental Fit Index Changes for Nested Structural Equation Models," Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol. 30, pp. 289-316.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Kraemer, K. L., Danziger, J. N., Dunkle, D. E., and King, J. L. (1993). "The Usefulness of Computer-Based Information to Public Managers," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, pp. 129-148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Lohmöller, J. B. (1984). LVPLS Program Manual: Latent Variables Path Analysis with Partial Least-Squares Estimation, Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung, Köln, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Mathieson, K. (1991). "Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior," Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, pp. 173-191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Mawhinney, C., and Lederer, A. (1990). "A Study of Personal Computer Utilization by Managers," Information and Management, Vol. 18, pp. 243-353. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Miller, J. (1989). "Information Systems Effectiveness: The Fit Between Business Needs and Information Systems Capabilities," Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information Systems, Boston, MA, December, pp. 273-288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Moore, G. C., and Benbasat, I. (1991). "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, pp. 192-222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Moran, T. P. (1981). "An Applied Psychology of the User," Computing Surveys, Vol. 13, pp. 1-11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Narayana, C. L. (1977). "Graphical Positioning Scale: An Economical Instrument for Surveys," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 14, pp. 118-122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Nath, R. (1989). "Are Frequent Computer Users More Satisfied?," Information Processing and Management, Vol. 25, pp. 557-562.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Nickerson, R. S. (1981). "Why Interactive Systems are Sometimes Not Used by People Who Might Benefit From Them," International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 15, pp. 469-483.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. O'Reilly III, C. A. (1982). "Variations in Decision Makers' Use of Information Sources," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 25, pp. 756-771.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Reimann, B. C., and Waren, A. S. (1985). "User-Oriented Criteria for the Selection of DSS Software," Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, Vol. 28, pp. 166-179. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Robertson, D. C. (1989). "Social Determinants of Information System Use," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 5, pp. 55-72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Sambamurthy, V., and Chin, W. W. (1994). "The Effects of Group Attitude Toward Alternative GDSS Design on the Decision-Making Performance of Computer-Supported Groups," Decision Sciences, Vol. 25, pp. 215-241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Schewe, C. D., and Wiek, J. L. (1977). "Guide to MIS User Satisfaction," Journal of Systems Management, Vol. 28, pp. 6-10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., and Warshaw, P. R. (1988). "The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15, pp. 325-343.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Straub, D., Limayem, M., and Karahanna-Evaristo, E. (1995). "Measuring System Usage: Implications for IS Theory Testing," Management Science, Vol. 41, pp.1328-1342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Stuart, E. W. (1986). "Experimental Tests of Classical Conditioning in an Advertising Context," PhD. Dissertation, University Microfilms.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Szajna, B. (1994). "Software Evaluation and Choice: Predictive Validation of the Technology Acceptance Instrument," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 18, pp. 319-324. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Taylor, S., and Todd, P. A. (1995a). "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models," Information Systems Research, Vol. 6, pp.144-176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Taylor, S., and Todd, P. A. (1995). "Assessing IT Usage: The Role of Prior Experience," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, pp. 561-570. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., and Howell, J. M. (1991). "Personal Computing: Towards a Conceptual Model of Utilization," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 15, pp. 125-143. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Torkzadeh, G. (1988). "The Quality of User Documentation: An Instrument Validation," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 5, pp. 99-108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Trice, A. M., and Treacy, M. E. (1988). "Utilization as a Dependent Variable in MIS Research," DATA BASE, Vol. 19, pp. 33-41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Umananth, N. S., and Vessey, I. (1991). "Presentation of Multiattribute Data: Testing the Theory of Cognitive Fit," Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Information Systems, New York, NY, pp. 153-164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Van Den Wollenberg, A. L. (1977). "Redundancy Analysis: An Alternative to Canonical Correlation Analysis," Psychometrica, Vol. 42, pp. 207-219.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. (1996). "A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test," forthcoming in Decision Sciences.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. (1995). "Pre-Prototype User Acceptance Testing: Three Validation Experiments," University of Minnesota, working paper, January.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Vessey, I. (1991). "Cognitive Fit: A Theory-Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature," Decision Sciences, Vol. 22, No. 219-240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Werner, D. J. (1974). "A Study of the Use of an Experimental Information System in a Medical Environment," Management Informatics, Vol. 3, pp. 133-140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Westcott, R. (1985). "Client Satisfaction: The Yardstick for Measuring Success," Journal of Information Systems Management, Vol. 2, pp. 50-53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Wold, H. (1985). "Partial Least Squares," in Kotz, S., and Johnson, N. L. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, Vol. 6, New York: Wiley, pp. 581-591.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Yaverbaum, G. J., and Nosek, J. (1992). "Effects of Information System education and Training on User Satisfaction: An Empirical Evaluation," Information and Management, Vol. 22, pp. 217-225. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Zinkhan, G. M., Stahler, E. A. J., and Kinnear, T. C. (1987). "Individual Differences and Marketing Decision Support System Usage and Satisfaction," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 24, pp. 208-214.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems
        ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems  Volume 32, Issue 3
        Special issue on adoption, diffusion, and infusion of IT
        Summer 2001
        103 pages
        ISSN:0095-0033
        EISSN:1532-0936
        DOI:10.1145/506724
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2001 Authors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 July 2001

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader