skip to main content
article
Free Access

An experimental study on the role of touch in shared virtual environments

Published:01 December 2000Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Investigating virtual environments has become an increasingly interesting research topic for engineers, computer and cognitive scientists, and psychologists. Although there have been several recent studies focused on the development of multimodal virtual environments (VEs) to study human-machine interactions, less attention has been paid to human-human and human-machine interactions in shared virtual environments (SVEs), and to our knowledge, no attention paid at all to what extent the addition of haptic communication between people would contribute to the shared experience. We have developed a multimodal shared virtual environment and performed a set of experiments with human subjects to study the role of haptic feedback in collaborative tasks and whether haptic communication through force feedback can facilitate a sense of being and collaborating with a remote partner. The study concerns a scenario where two participants at remote sites must cooperate to perform a joint task in an SVE. The goals of the study are (1) to assess the impact of force feedback on task performance, (2) to better understand the role of haptic communication in human-human interactions, (3) to study the impact of touch on the subjective sense of collaborating with a human as reported by the participants based on what they could see and feel, and (4) to investigate if gender, personality, or emotional experiences of users can affect haptic communication in SVEs. The outcomes of this research can have a powerful impact on the development of next-generation human-computer interfaces and network protocols that integrate touch and force feedback technology into the internet, development of protocols and techniques for collaborative teleoperation such as hazardous material removal, space station.

References

  1. BARFIELD,W.AND FURNESS,T.A.,EDS. 1995. Virtual Environments and Advanced Interface Design. Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. BASDOGAN, C., HO, C., AND SRINIVASAN, M. A. 1997. A ray-based haptic rendering technique for displaying shape and texture of 3D objects in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the Conference on ASME Winter Annual Meeting (Dallas, TX). 77-84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. BASDOGAN, C., HO, C., SLATER, M., AND SRINIVASAN, M. A. 1998. The role of haptic communication in shared virtual environments. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Phantom User Group (Dedham, MA, Oct. 3-6). http://www.ai.mit.edu/conferences/pug98Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. BENFORD, S., GREENHALGH, C., REYNARD, G., BROWN, C., AND KOLEVA, B. 1998. Understanding and constructing shared spaces with mixed-reality boundaries. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 5, 3, 185-223. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. BROLL, W. 1995. Interacting in distributed collaborative virtual environments. In Proceedings of 19th IEEE Conference on Computer Software and Applications (COMPSAC '95). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 148-155. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. CHOI,H.R.,CHOI,B.H.,AND RYEW, S. M. 1997. Haptic display in virtual collaborative workspace shared by multiple users. In Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication. 478-483.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. DAS, H., ZAK, H., KIM,W.S.,BEJCZY,A.K.,AND SCHENKER, P. S. 1992. Operator performance with alternative manual control modes in teleoperation. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 1, 2 (Spring), 201-218. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. DURLACH,N.AND SLATER, M. 2000. Presence in virtual environments and virtual togetherness. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 9,1. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. ELLIS, S. R. 1992. Nature and origin of virtual environments: A bibliographic essay. Comput. Syst. Engin. 2, 4, 321-347.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. HELD,R.M.AND DURLACH, N. I. 1992. Telepresence. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 1,1 (Winter), 109-112. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. HO, C., BASDOGAN, C., SLATER, M., DURLACH, N., AND SRINIVASAN, M. A. 1998. An experiment on the influence of haptic communication on the sense of being together. In Proceedings of the British Telecom Workshop on Presence in Shared Virtual Environments (Ipswich, Suffolk, June 10-11).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. HO, C., BASDOGAN, C., AND SRINIVASAN, M. A. 1999. An efficient haptic rendering technique for displaying 3D polyhedral objects and their surface details in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 8, 5, 477-491. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. JASNOCH, U., ANDERSON, B., AND JOSEPH, H. 1996. Shared 3D environments within a virtual prototyping environment. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on WET ICE'. 274-279. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. LEARY, M. 1983. Social anxiousness: The construct and its measurement. J. Person. Asses. 47, 66-75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. MACEDONIA,M.AND NOLL, S. 1997. A transatlantic research and development environment. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 17,2,76-82. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. NORMAND, V., BABSKI, C., BENFORD, S., BULLOCK, A., CARION, S., FARCET, N., FRECON, E., HARVEY, J., KIUJPERS, N., MAGNENAT-THALMANN, N., RAUPP-MUSSE, S., RODDEN, T., SLATER, M., SMITH, G., STEED, A., THALMANN, D., TROMP, J., USOH, M., VAN LIEMPD, G., AND KLADIAS, N. 1999. The COVEN project: Exploring applicative, technical and usage dimensions of collaborative virtual environments. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 8, 2, 218-236. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. PARK,K.S.AND KENYON, R. 1999. Effects of network characteristics on human performance in a collaborative virtual environment. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality. 104-111. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. SALISBURY,J.K.AND SRINIVASAN, M. A. 1997. Phantom-based haptic interaction with virtual objects. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 17,5. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. SHERIDAN, T. B. 1992a. Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 1, 1 (Winter), 120-126. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. SHERIDAN, T. B. 1992b. Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. SCHROEDER, R. 1997. Networked worlds: Social aspects of multi-user virtual reality technology. Soc. Res. Onl. 2, 4. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/4/5.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. SLATER, M., SADAGIC, A., USOH, M., AND SCHROEDER, R. 2000. Small group behaviour in a virtual and real environment. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 9, 1, 37-51. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. SRINIVASAN,M.A.AND BASDOGAN, C. 1997. Haptics in virtual environments: Taxonomy, research status, and challenges. Comput. Graph. 21, 4, 393-404.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. STANNEY,K.M.AND SALVENDY, G. 1998. Aftereffects and sense of presence in virtual environments: Formulation of a research and development agenda. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 10, 2, 135-187.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. STANNEY,K.M.,MOURANT,R.R.,AND KENNEDY, R. S. 1998. Human factors issues in virtual environments: A review of the literature. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 7, 4, 327-351. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. STEED, A., SLATER, M., SADAGIC, A., TROMP, J., AND BULLOCK, A. 1999. Leadership and collaboration in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality (Houston, TX, Mar.). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. TROMP, J., STEED, A., FRECON, E., BULLOCK, A., SADAGIC, A., AND SLATER, M. 1998. Small group behaviour in the COVEN project. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 18, 6, 53-63. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. WATERS,R.AND BARRUS, J. 1997. The rise of shared virtual environments. IEEE Spectrum 34, 3 (Mar.), 20-25. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. WELCH,R.B.,BLACKMON,T.T.,LIU, A., MELLERS,B.A.,AND STARK, L. W. 1996. The effects of pictorial realism, delay of visual feedback, and observer interactively on the subjective sense of presence. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 5, 3, 263-273.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An experimental study on the role of touch in shared virtual environments

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in

              Full Access

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader