Eveline S. Graf
ABSTRACT
XoSoft is a soft modular wearable assistive exoskeleton for people with mild to moderate gait impairments. It is currently being developed by a European Consortium (www.xosoft.eu) and aims to provide tailored and active lower limb support during ambulation. During development, user-centered design principles were followed in parallel with the aim of providing functional support during gait. A prototype was developed and was tested for practicability, usability, comfort and assistive function (summarized as basic functionality) with a potential end user. The prototype consisted of a garment, electromagnetic clutch-controlled elastic bands supporting knee- and hip flexion and a backpack containing the sensor and actuator control of the system. The participant had experienced a stroke and presented with unilateral impairment of the lower and upper extremities. In testing, he donned and doffed the prototype independently as far as possible, and performed walking trials with the system in both active (powered on) and passive (powered off) modes. Afterwards, the participant rated the perceived pressure and various elements of usability. Results highlighted aspects of the system for improvement during future phases of XoSoft development, and also identified useful aspects of prototype design to be maintained. The basic functionality of XoSoft could be assumed as satisfactory given that it was the first version of a working prototype. The study highlights the benefits of this participatory evaluation design approach in assistive soft robotics development.
- A. Bangor, P.T. Kortum, and J.T. Miller. 2008. An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 24, 6 (2008), 574--594.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- C. V. Bouten, C. W. Oomens, F. P. Baaijens, and D. L. Bader. 2003. The etiology of pressure ulcers: Skin deep or muscle bound? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 84, 4 (apr 2003), 616--619.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. A. Cameron. 1996. Assessing work-related body-part discomfort: Current strategies and a behaviorally oriented assessment tool. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 18, 5 (1996), 389--398.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. French, L. H. Thomas, J. Coupe, N. E. McMahon, L. Connell, J. Harrison, C. J. Sutton, S. Tishkovskaya, and C. L. Watkins. 2016. Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke - Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Cochrane Database of Systematic Rev 11 (2016).Google Scholar
- E. S. Grood and W.J. Suntay. 1983. A Joint Coordinate System for the Clinical Description of Three-Dimensional Motions: Application to the Knee. Transactions of the ASME 105 (1983), 136--144.Google Scholar
- F.T. Hoaglund, H.E. Jergesen, L. Wilson, W. Lamoreux, and R. Roberts. 1983. Evaluation of problems and needs of veteran lower-limb amputees in the San Francisco Bay Area during the period 1977-1980. Journal of rehabilitation research and development 20 (1983), 57--71.Google Scholar
- K. Lakshminarayan, A. K. Berger, C. C. Fuller, D. R. Jacobs Jr, D. C. Anderson, L. M. Steffen, A. Sillah, and R. V. Luepker. 2014. Trends in Ten-Year Survival of Stroke Patients Hospitalized between 1980 and 2000: The Minnesota Stroke Survey. Stroke2 45, 9 (2014), 2575--2581.Google Scholar
- R. List, T. Gülay, M. Stoop, and S. Lorenzetti. 2013. Kinematics of the trunk and the lower extremities during restricted and unrestricted squats. Journal of strength and conditioning research 27, 6 (jun 2013), 1529--38.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. F. Mak, M. Zhang, and D. A. Boone. 2001. State-of-the-art research in lower-limb prosthetic biomechanics-socket interface: a review. Journal of rehabilitation research and development 38, 2 (2001), 161--74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11392649Google Scholar
- J. Mehrholz, K. Wagner, K. Rutte, D. Meißner, and M. Pohl. 2007. Predictive Validity and Responsiveness of the Functional Ambulation Category in Hemiparetic Patients After Stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 88, 10 (oct 2007), 1314--1319.Google ScholarCross Ref
- National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance 2014. Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Quick Reference Guide. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance, Perth, Australia.Google Scholar
- C. W. J. Oomens, S. Loerakker, and D. L. Bader. 2010. The importance of internal strain as opposed to interface pressure in the prevention of pressure related deep tissue injury. Journal of tissue viability 19, 2 (may 2010), 35--42.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Ortiz, T. Poliero, G. Cairoli, E. Graf, and D. G. Caldwell. 2018. Energy Efficiency Analysis and Design Optimization of an Actuation System in a Soft Modular Lower Limb Exoskeleton. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 3, 1 (jan 2018), 484--491.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J.L. Pons. 2008. Wearable Robots: Biomechatronic Exoskeletons. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken.Google ScholarCross Ref
- V. Power, L. O'Sullivan, A. de Eyto, S. Schülein, C. Nikamp, C. Bauer, J. Mueller, and J. Ortiz. 2016. Exploring User Requirements for a Lower Body Soft Exoskeleton to Assist Mobility. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments - PETRA '16. ACM New York, NY, Corfu Island, Greece, 1--6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. E. Sanders, B. S. Goldstein, and D. F. Leotta. 1995. Skin response to mechanical stress: adaptation rather than breakdown-a review of the literature. Journal of rehabilitation research and development 32, 3 (oct 1995), 214--26. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8592293Google Scholar
- I. D. Swain and D. L. Bader. 2002. The measurement of interface pressure and its role in soft tissue breakdown. Journal of tissue viability 12, 4 (oct 2002), 132-4, 136-7, 140--6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12476502Google ScholarCross Ref
- World Health Organization 2014. Facts about ageing. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/ageing/about/facts/en/ Last accessed: 2018-01-19.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Basic functionality of a prototype wearable assistive soft exoskeleton for people with gait impairments: a case study
Recommendations
Exploring User Requirements for a Lower Body Soft Exoskeleton to Assist Mobility
PETRA '16: Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive EnvironmentsThe XoSoft (www.xosoft.eu) project -- funded under the European Union's Horizon 2020 framework programme -- aims to develop a lower body soft exoskeleton to assist adults with mobility impairments. The XoSoft concept is being developed via an iterative ...
A simulation-based framework with a proprioceptive musculoskeletal model for evaluating the rehabilitation exoskeleton system
Highlights- A simulation-based method with a proprioceptive musculoskeletal model was established to evaluate the rehabilitation exoskeleton.
Abstract Background and objectiveVarious rehabilitation exoskeletons have been designed to help people regain normal gait from stroke effects. However, the evaluation and further optimization of these exoskeletons are not convenient ...
An assistive lower limb exoskeleton for people with neurological gait disorders
2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR)Lower limb exoskeletons have already proven the capability to give back mobility to people suffering from spinal cord injury (SCI). Other important populations such as people with multiple sclerosis or muscular dystrophy, frail elderly and stroke victims, ...
Comments