ABSTRACT
Recent years have seen a rapid proliferation of mass-market consumer software that takes inspiration from video games. Usually summarized as "gamification", this trend connects to a sizeable body of existing concepts and research in human-computer interaction and game studies, such as serious games, pervasive games, alternate reality games, or playful design. However, it is not clear how "gamification" relates to these, whether it denotes a novel phenomenon, and how to define it. Thus, in this paper we investigate "gamification" and the historical origins of the term in relation to precursors and similar concepts. It is suggested that "gamified" applications provide insight into novel, gameful phenomena complementary to playful phenomena. Based on our research, we propose a definition of "gamification" as the use of game design elements in non-game contexts.
- Abt, C. C. Serious Games. Viking, New York, 1970.Google Scholar
- Ahn, L. von and Dabbish, L. Designing games with a purpose. Communications of the ACM 51, 8 (2008), 58--67. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alfrink, K. New games for new cities. Presentation, FutureEverything, Manchester, UK, 2011. http://goo.gl/6Wfx4.Google Scholar
- Barr, P. Video Game Values: Play as Human-Computer Interaction. Doctoral Dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington, 2007.Google Scholar
- Belman, J., and Flanagan, M. Exploring the Creative Potential of Values Conscious Game Design: Students' Experiences with the VAP Curriculum. Eludamos 4, 1 (2010), n.p.Google Scholar
- Bernhaupt, R., ed. Evaluating User Experience in Games: Concepts and Methods. Springer, London, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Björk, S. and Holopainen, J. Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media, Boston, MA, 2005.Google Scholar
- Blythe, M., Hassenzahl, M., and Wright, P. Introduction: Beyond fun. interactions 11, 5 (2004), 36--37. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bogost, I. Exploitationware. Gamasutra, 2011. http://goo.gl/jK1VR.Google Scholar
- Brathwaite, B., and Schreiber, I. Challenges for Game Designers. Charles River Media, Boston, Ma, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Burghardt, G. M. The Genesis of Animal Play: Testing the Limits. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Caillois, R. Man, Play, and Games. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Chicago, 2001.Google Scholar
- Calvillo-Gámez, E. H., Cairns, P., and Cox, A. L. Assessing the Core Elements of the Gaming Experience. In R. Bernhaupt, ed., Evaluating User Experience in Games. Springer London, London, 2010, 47--71.Google Scholar
- Carroll, J. M. and Thomas, J. C. Metaphor and the cognitive representation of computing systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 12, (1982), 107--116.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Carroll, J. M. and Thomas, J. M. FUN. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 19, 3 (1988), 21--24. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carroll, J. M. The Adventure of Getting to Know a Computer. Computer 15, 11 (1982), 49--58. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chao, D. Doom as an interface for process management. Proc. CHI '01, ACM Press (2001), 152--157. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chatfield, T. Fun Inc.: Why Gaming Will Dominate the Twenty-First Century. Pegasus, London, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Consalvo, M. There is No Magic Circle. Games and Culture 4, 4 (2009), 408--417.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Costello, B. and Edmonds, E. A study in play, pleasure and interaction design. Proc. DPPI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 76--91. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Crumlish, C. and Malone, E. Designing Social Interfaces: Principles, Patterns, and Practices for Improving the User Experience. O'Reilly, Sebastopol, 2009.Google Scholar
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper and Row, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
- Deterding, S. Playful Technologies. In C. Wiedemann, and S. Zehle, eds., Depletion Design. A Glossary of Network Technologies. Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam, forthcoming.Google Scholar
- Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O'Hara, K., and Dixon, D. Gamification: Using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. Proc. CHI EA '11, ACM Press (2011), 2425--2428. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dignan, A. Game Frame: Using Games as a Strategy for Success. Free Press, New York et al., 2011.Google Scholar
- Dixon, D. Pattern Languages for CMC Design. In B. Whitworth and A. De Moor, eds., Handbook of Research on Socio-Technical Design and Social Networking Systems. IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 2009, 402--415.Google Scholar
- Ferrara, J. Playful Design. Creating Game Experiences in Everyday Interfaces. Rosenfeld Media, New York, forthcoming. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fontijn, W. and Hoonhout, J. Functional Fun with Tangible User Interfaces. Proc. DIGITEL'07, IEEE (2007), 119--123. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fullerton, T. 2008 Game Design Workshop: A Playcentric Approach to Creating Innovative Games. Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Gaver, W. W., Bowers, J., Boucher, A., et al. The drift table: designing for ludic engagement. Proc. CHI EA '04. ACM Press (2004), 885--900. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gaver, W. W. Designing for Homo Ludens. I3 Magazine 12, (2002).Google Scholar
- Grace, M. V. and Hall, J. Projecting Surveillance Entertainment. Presentation, ETech, San Diego, CA, 2008.Google Scholar
- Halter, E. From Sun Tzu to Xbox: War and Videogames. Thunder's Mouth Press, New York, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hassenzahl, M. The Thing and I: Understanding the Relationship Between User and Product. In M. A. Blythe, K. Overbeeke, A. F. Monk and P. C. Wright, eds., Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment. Kluwer, New York et al., 2003, 31--41. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Helgason, D. 2010 Trends. Unity Technologies Blog, 2010. http://goo.gl/AZ4vm.Google Scholar
- Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., and Zubek, R. MDA: A Formal Approach to Game Design and Game Research. Proc. AAAI workshop on Challenges in Game, AAAI Press (2004).Google Scholar
- Huotari, K. and Hamari, J. "Gamification" from the perspective of service marketing. Proc. CHI 2011 Workshop Gamification (2011). http://goo.gl/JUIpaGoogle Scholar
- Jakobsson, M. and Sotamaa, O. Special Issue - Game Reward Systems. Game Studies 11, 1 (2011), n.p.Google Scholar
- Jenkins, H., Camper, B., Chisholm, A., et al. From Serious Games to Serious Gaming. In U. Ritterfeld, M. Cody and P. Vorderer, eds., Serious Games: Mechanisms and Effects. Routledge, New York, 2009, 448--468.Google Scholar
- Jordan, P. W. Designing Pleasurable Products. An introduction to the new human factors. Taylor & Francis, London, New York, 2002.Google Scholar
- Juul, J. A Casual Revolution: Reinventing Video Games and Their Players. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Juul, J. Half-real: video games between real rules and fictional worlds. MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Korhonen, H., Montola, M., and Arrasvuori, J. Understanding Playful User Experiences Through Digital Games. Proc. DPPI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 274--285.Google Scholar
- Lucero, A. and Arrasvuori, J. PLEX Cards: a source of inspiration when designing for playfulness. Proc. Fun and Games '10, ACM Press (2010), 28--37. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Malaby, T. M. Beyond Play: A New Approach to Games. Games and Culture 2, 2 (2007), 95--113.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Malone, T. W. Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science 4 (1981), 333--370.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McDonald, M., Musson, R., and Smith, R. Using Productivity Games to Prevent Defects. In M. McDonald, R. Musson, and R. Smith, eds., The Practical Guide to Defect Prevention, Microsoft Press, Redmond, 2008, 79--95.Google Scholar
- McGonigal, J. Reality Is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World. Penguin, London, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Montola, M., Nummenmaa, T., Lucero, A., Boberg, M., and Korhonen, H. Applying game achievement systems to enhance user experience in a photo sharing service. Proc. MindTrek '09, ACM Press (2009), 94--97. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Montola, M., Stenros, J., and Waern, A. Pervasive Games: Theory and Design. Experiences on the Boundary Between Life and Play. Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam et al., 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morrison, A., Viller, S., and Mitchell, P. Building sensitising terms to understand free-play in open-ended interactive art environments. Proc. CHI '11, ACM Press (2011), 2335--2344. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morrison, A. J., Mitchell, P., and Brereton, M. The lens of ludic engagement. Proc. MULTIMEDIA '07, ACM Press (2007), 509--512. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nacke, L. E., Drachen, A. and Goebel, S. Methods for Evaluating Gameplay Experience in a Serious Gaming Context. International Journal of Computer Science in Sport 9, 2 (2010).Google Scholar
- Paharia, R. Who coined the term "gamification"? Quora, 2010. http://goo.gl/CvcMs.Google Scholar
- Personal communication, R. Paharia, March 17, 2011.Google Scholar
- Priebatsch, S. The Game Layer on Top of the World. Presentation, SxSWi, Austin, 2011. http://goo.gl/DnwBH.Google Scholar
- Raessens, J. Playful Identities, or the Ludification of Culture. Games and Culture 1, 1 (2006), 52--57.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Reeves, B. and Read, J. L. Total Engagement: Using Games and Virtual Worlds to Change the Way People Work and Businesses Compete. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 2009.Google Scholar
- Ritterfeld, U., Cody, M., and Vorderer, P. Serious Games: Mechanisms and Effects. Routledge, London, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Salen, K. and Zimmerman, E. Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sawyer, B. and Smith, P. Serious Games Taxonomy. Presentation, GDC 2008, San Francisco, CA, 2008. http://goo.gl/OWVzo.Google Scholar
- Schaffer, N. Heuristic Evaluation of Games. In K. Isbister and N. Schaffer, eds., Game Usability: Advice from the Experts for Advancing the Player Experience. Morgan Kaufman, Amsterdam et al., 2008, 79--89.Google Scholar
- Schell, J. Visions of the Gamepocalypse. Presentation, Long Now Foundation, San Francisco, CA, July 27, 2010.Google Scholar
- Sicart, M. Defining Game Mechanics. Game Studies 8, 2 (2008), n.p.Google Scholar
- Sweetser, P. and Wyeth, P. GameFlow: A Model for Evaluating Player Enjoyment in Games. Computers in Entertainment 3, 3 (2005), Art. 3A. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Takahashi, D. Funware's threat to the traditional video game industry. Venturebeat, 2008. http://goo.gl/O9lSq.Google Scholar
- Taylor, T. L. The Assemblage of Play. Games and Culture 4, 4 (2009), 331--339.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Woszczynski, A. B., Roth, P. L., and Segars, A. H. Exploring the theoretical foundations of playfulness in computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior 18, 4 (2002), 369--388.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zhang, P. Motivational Affordances: Reasons for ICT Design and Use. Communications of the ACM 51, 11 (2008), 145--147. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zicherman, G. A Long Engagement and a Shotgun Wedding: Why Engagement is the Power Metric of the Decade. Presentation, Gamification Summit, San Francisco, CA, 2011. http://goo.gl/jlaO0.Google Scholar
- Zichermann, G. and Cunningham, C. Gamification by Design: Implementing Game Mechanics in Web and Mobile Apps. O'Reilly, Sebastopol, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hamari, J. and Eranti, V. Framework for Designing and Evaluating Game Achievements. Proc. DiGRA 2011: Think Design Play, DiGRA (2011).Google Scholar
- Flatla, D. R., Gutwin, C., Nacke, L. E., Bateman, S. and Mandryk, R. L. Calibration Games: Making Calibration Tasks Enjoyable by Adding Motivating Game Elements. Proc. UIST'11, ACM (2011). Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification"
Recommendations
A playful affordances model for gameful learning
TEEM '14: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing MulticulturalityGames are often cited for their inherent qualities that make them engaging, inspiring, fun and easy to learn. In education, two separate tracks of game-based learning and gamification have sought to activate the benefits of games and game design for the ...
Do You Think This is a Game?
CHI EA '18: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe general promise of employing the motivational power of games for serious purposes, such as performing physiotherapy exercises, is well-established. However, game user research discusses both the approach of gamification, i.e. adding game-elements on ...
A framework and immersive serious game for mild cognitive impairment
AbstractCognitive decline is common in the elderly. As a result, a range of cognitive rehabilitation games have been proposed to supplement or replace traditional rehabilitative training by offering benefits such as improved engagement. In this paper, we ...
Comments