skip to main content
article

A survey and analysis of Electronic Healthcare Record standards

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 December 2005Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Medical information systems today store clinical information about patients in all kinds of proprietary formats. To address the resulting interoperability problems, several Electronic Healthcare Record standards that structure the clinical content for the purpose of exchange are currently under development. In this article, we present a survey of the most relevant Electronic Healthcare Record standards, examine the level of interoperability they provide, and assess their functionality in terms of content structure, access services, multimedia support, and security. We further investigate the complementarity of the standards and assess their market relevance.

References

  1. Aden, T. and Eichelberg, M. 2005. Cross-enterprise search and access to clinical information based on IHE Retrieve Information for Display. In Proceedings of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS'05). Elsevier, 986--991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Aden, T., Eichelberg, M., and Thoben, W. 2004. A fault-tolerant cryptographic protocol for patient record requests. In Proceedings of EuroPACS-MIR 2004 in the Enlarged Europe. EuroPACS, 103--106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. ANSI. American National Standards Institute. http://www.ansi.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Araki, K., Ohashi, K., Yamazaki, S., Hirose, Y., Yamashita, Y., Yamamoto, R., Minagawa, K., Sakamoto, N., and Yoshihara, H. 2000. Medical Markup Language (MML) for XML-based hospital information interchange. J. Medical Syst. 24, 3, 195--211. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. ARTEMIS. The ARTEMIS Project. http://www.srdc.metu.edu.tr/webpage/projects/artemis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Beale, T. 2002. Archetypes: Constraint-based domain models for future-proof information systems. In Workshop on Behavioural Semantics (OOPSLA'02). http://www.deepthought.com.au/it/archetypes/arche-types_new.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Beale, T. 2005. The openEHR integration information model, rev. 0.5. openEHR Reference Model. The openEHR Foundation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Beale, T. and Heard, S. Archetype definitions and principles. http://www.openehr.org/repositories/spec-dev/latest/publishing/architecture/archety-pes/principles/REV_HIST.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Beale, T. and Heard, S. 2003. The openEHR EHR service model, rev. 0.2. openEHR Reference Model. The openEHR Foundation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Beale, T. and Heard, S. 2005. Archetype Definition Language (ADL), Rev. 2.0rc1 (Release 1.0 draft). The openEHR Foundation. openEHR Specification.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Beale, T., Heard, S., Kalra, D., and Lloyd, D. 2004. The openEHR EHR_EXTRACT information model, Rev. 1.3.5. openEHR Reference Model. The openEHR Foundation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Beale, T., Heard, S., Kalra, D., and Lloyd, D. 2005a. The openEHR common information model Rev. 2.0rc1 (Release 1.0 draft). openEHR Reference Model. The openEHR Foundation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Beale, T., Heard, S., Kalra, D., and Lloyd, D. 2005b. The openEHR data types information model Rev. 1.9.1. openEHR Reference Model. The openEHR Foundation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Beale, T., Heard, S., Kalra, D., and Lloyd, D. 2005c. The openEHR demographic information model, Rev. 1.4.7. openEHR Reference Model. The openEHR Foundation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Beale, T., Heard, S., Kalra, D., and Lloyd, D. 2005d. The openEHR EHR information model Rev. 5.0rc1 (Release 1.0 draft). openEHR Reference Model. The openEHR Foundation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Beale, T., Heard, S., Kalra, D., and Lloyd, D. 2005e. The openEHR support information model Rev. 1.5rc1 (Release 1.0 draft). openEHR Reference Model. The openEHR Foundation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Beale, T., Heard, S., Kalra, D., and Lloyd, D. 2005f. The openEHR data structures information model Rev. 1.6rc1 (Release 1.0 draft). openEHR Reference Model. The openEHR Foundation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Bicer, V., Kilic, O., Dogac, A., and Laleci, G. B. 2005. Archetype-based semantic interoperability of Web service messages in the healthcare domain. Inte. J. Semantic Web Informat. Syst. 1, 4, 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Bicer, V., Laleci, G., Dogac, A., and Kabak, Y. 2005a. Artemis message exchange framework: Semantic interoperability of exchanged messages in the healthcare domain. ACM Sigmod Record 34, 3 (Sept.). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Bicer, V., Laleci, G. B., Dogac, A., and Kabak, Y. 2005b. Providing semantic interoperability in the healthcare domain through ontology mapping. In Proceedings of eChallenges 2005. Ljubljana, Slovenia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Boniface, M. and Wilken, P. 2005. ARTEMIS: Towards a secure interoperability infrastructure for healthcare information systems. In Studies in Health Technology and Informatics---From Grid to Healthgrid: Proceedings of Healthgrid 2005. T. Solomonides, R. McClatchey, V. Breton, Y. Legré, and S. Nørager, Eds. Vol. 112. IOS Press, 181--189.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Brown, N. and Reynolds, M. 2000. Strategy for production and maintenance of standards for interoperability within and between service departments and other healthcare domains. Short Strategic Study CEN/TC 251/N00-047, CEN/TC 251 Health Informatics. Brussels, Belgium.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Canada Health Infoway. http://www.canadahealthinfoway.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. CBC Archetype. Complete blood count archetype ADL definition. http://www.openehr.org/repositories/archetype-dev/adl_1.1/adl/archety-pes/openehr/ehr/entry/openehr-ehr-observation.haematology-cbc.draft.adl.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. CEN ENV 12265. 1997. Medical informatics--Electronic healthcare record architecture. European Prestandard ENV 12265, European Committee for Standardization. Brussels, Belgium.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. CEN ENV 13606. 2000. Medical informatics---Electronic healthcare record communication. European Prestandard ENV 13606, European Committee for Standardization. Brussels, Belgium.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. CEN prEN 13606-1. 2004. Health informatics--Electronic health record communication--Part 1: Reference model. Draft European Standard for CEN Enquiry prEN 13606-1, European Committee for Standardization. Brussels, Belgium.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. CEN prEN 14822-1. 2003. General purpose information components. Draft European Standard prEN 14822-1, European Committee for Standardization. Brussels, Belgium.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. CEN TS 14796. 2003. Health informatics---Data types. Technical Specification TS 14796, European Committee for Standardization. Brussels, Belgium.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. CEN/TC 251. European Committee for Standardization---Technical Committee on Health Informatics. http://www.centc251.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Channin, D. S., Siegel, E. L., Carr, C., Sensmeier, J., Henderson, M., Behlen, F. M., Parisot, C., and Siegel, E. L. 2001. Integrating the healthcare enterprise: A primer. Part 4--5. Radiographics 21, 6 (Nov--Dec), 1597--1608.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Channin, D. S., Siegel, E. L., Parisot, C., Wanchoo, V., and Leontiev, A. 2001. Integrating the healthcare enterprise: A primer. Part 1--3. Radiographics 21, 5 (Sept--Oct), 1339--1358.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Clunie, D. A. 2000. DICOM Structured Reporting, 1st ED. PixelMed Publishing, Bangor PA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. DICOM. 2004. Digital imaging and communications in medicine. NEMA Standards Publication PS 3. National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Rosslyn VA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. DICOM Supplement 104 2005. DICOM encapsulation of PDF documents. DICOM Standards Committee, Working Group 6, Final Text. ftp://medical.nema.org/medical/dicom/final/sup104_ft.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. DICOM Supplement 42 2004. MPEG2 transfer syntax. DICOM Standards Committee, Working Group 13. Visible light, final text. ftp://medical.nema.org/medical/dicom/final/sup42_ft. pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. DICOM Supplement 85 2004. Web access to DICOM persistent objects (WADO). Joint DICOM Standards Committee/ISO TC215 Ad Hoc Working Group on WADO. Final text. ftp://medical.nema.org/medical/dicom/final/sup85_ft. pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. DICOM Supplement 99 2005. Extended negotiation of user identity. DICOM Standards Committee, Working Group 14. Final text. ftp://medical.nema.org/medical/dicom/final/sup99_ft. pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Dierks, T. and Allen, C. 1999. The TLS (Transport Layer Security) protocol. IETF Specification RFC 2246. Internet Engineering Task Force. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2246.txt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Dogac, A., Laleci, G., Kirbas, S., Kabak, Y., Sinir, S., Yildiz, A., and Gurcan, Y. 2005. Artemis: deploying semantically enriched web services in the healthcare domain. Informat. Syst. J. (Special Issue on Semantic Web and Web Services). To appear. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Dogac, A., Laleci, G. B., Kabak, Y., Unal, S., Beale, T., Heard, S., Elkin, P., Najmi, F., Mattocks, C., and Webber, D. 2004. Exploiting ebXML registry semantic constructs for handling archetype metadata in healthcare informatics. Int. J. Metadata, Semantics Ontologies. To appear. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. ebRIM. ebXML Registry Information Model v2.5. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/regrep/documents/2.5/specs/ebrim-2.5.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. ebRS. ebXML Registry Services Specification v2.5. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/regrep/documents/2.5/specs/ebrs-2.5.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Eichelberg, M., Poiseau, E., B.Wein, B., and Riesmeier, J. 2003. IHE Europe: extending the IHE initiative to the European healthcare market. In Medical Imaging 2003: PACS and Integrated Medical Information Systems: Design and Evaluation. H. K. Huang and O. M. Ratib, EDS. Vol. 5033. SPIE, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. freebXML. (OMAR) implementation. http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/3.0/index.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Guo, J., Takada, A., Tanaka, K., Sato, J., Suzuki, M., Suzuki, T., Nakashima, Y., Araki, K., and Yoshihara, H. 2004. The development of MML (Medical Markup Language) version 3.0 as a medical document exchange format for HL7 messages. J. Medical Syst. 28, 6, 523--533. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. HIMSS. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. http://www.himss.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. HL7. Health Level 7 (HL7). http://www.hl7.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. HL7 2.5 2000. HL7, Application Protocol for Electronic Data Exchange in Healthcare Environments, Version 2.5, ANSI Standard. Ann Arbor MI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. HL7 CCOW. Clinical context object workgroup standard. http://www.hl7.org.au/CCOW.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. HL7 CDA Implementations. HL7 Clinical document architecture implementations. http://www.hl7.org.au/CDA.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. HL7 CDA Release 1.0 2000. The HL7 Version 3 Standard: Clinical Data Architecture. Release 1.0. ANSI Standard.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. HL7 CDA Release 2.0 2005. The HL7 Version 3 Standard: Clinical Data Architecture. Release 2.0. ANSI Standard.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. HL7 RIM. HL7 reference information model. http://www.hl7.org/library/data-model/RIM/modelpage_non.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. HL7 V3. HL7 version 3 message development framework. http://www.hl7.org/library/mdf99/mdf99.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Hussein, R., Engelmann, U., Schröter, A., and Meinzer, H.-P. 2004a. DICOM structured reporting: Part 1. Overview and characteristics. Radiographics 24, 3 (May--June), 891--96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Hussein, R., Engelmann, U., Schröter, A., and Meinzer, H.-P. 2004b. DICOM structured reporting: Part 2. Problems and challenges in implementation for PACS workstations. Radiographics 24, 3 (May--June), 897--909.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Iakovidis, I. 1998. Towards personal health records: Current situation, obstacles and trends in implementation of Electronic Healthcare Records in Europe. Int. J. Medical Informatics 52, 128, 105--117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. IHE. Integrating the healthcare enterprise. http://www.ihe.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. IHE. 2005a. Cross-enterprise Document Sharing for Imaging (XDS-I). IHE Radiology Technical Framework, Supplement 2005--2006. Trial Implementation, Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise. http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/IHE_RAD-TF_Suppl_XDSI_TI_2005-08-15.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. IHE. 2005b. Cross-Enterprise user authentication (XUA) integration profile. IHE IT Infrastructure Technical Framework, Supplement 2005--2006. Public Comment II Version, Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise. http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/IHE_ITI_TF-Supplement_Cross-Ent_User_Authentication_PC-2_2005-07-28.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. IHE. 2005c. Document digital signature content profile. IHE IT Infrastructure Technical Framework, Supplement 2005-2006. Trial Implementation, Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise. http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/IHE_ITI_TF-Supplement_Digital_Signature-TI_2005-08-15.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. IHE. 2005d. IT infrastructure technical framework Rev. 2.0. Tech. rep., Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise. http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/index.cfm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. ISO 17432. 2004. Health Informatics---Messages and Communication---Web Access to DICOM Persistent Objects. International Standard IS 17432, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. ISO/TR 18307. 2001. Health informatics---Interoperability and compatibility in messaging and communication standards---Key characteristics. Tech. rep. TR 18307. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. ISO/TR 20514. 2005. Health informatics---Electronic health record---Definition, scope and context. Tech. rep. TR 20514. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. ISO/TS 18308. 2004. Health informatics---Requirements for an electronic health record architecture. Tech. speci. TS 18308. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Kalra, D. 2004. CEN prEN 13606, draft standard for Electronic Health Record Communication and its introduction to ISO TC/215. Document CEN/TC 251/WG I/N04-52, CEN/TC 251. Health Informatics, Brussels, Belgium.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Kerberos. Kerberos: The network authentication protocol. http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/www/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Klein, G. and Beeler, G. 2000. Memorandum of understanding on Intensifying the collaboration between CEN/TC 251 and HL7. Document CEN/TC 251/N00-022, CEN/TC 251. Health Informatics, Brussels, Belgium.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. LOINC. Logical observation identifiers names and codes (LOINC). http://www.loinc.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. MML 2003. Medical Markup Language (MML) Specification Version 3.0. MedXML Consortium. http://www.medxml.net/E_mml30/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. NAICS. North American Industrial Classification Scheme (NAICS) Codes. http://www.naics.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. NEMA. National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). http://www.nema.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. OpenEHR. openEHR Community. http://www.openehr.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. OpenGALEN. OpenGALEN Foundation. http://www.opengalen.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. RSNA. Radiological Society of North America. http://www.rsna.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. SAML 2005. Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) 2.0. Tech. Overview, Working Draft 06. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/12938/sstc-saml-tech-overview-2.0-draft-06.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. SAML Profiles 2005. Profiles for the OASIS Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Version 2.0. OASIS Standard. http://docs.oasis-open.org/security/saml/v2.0/saml-profiles-2.0-os.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. SNOMED. SNOMED (The Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine) Clinical Terms. http://www.snomed.org/snomedct_txt.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Trombert-Paviot, B., Rodrigues, J. M., Rogers, J. E., Baud, R., van der Haring, E., Rassinoux, A. M., Abrial, V., Clavel, L., and Idir, H. 2000. GALEN: A third generation terminology tool to support a multipurpose national coding system for surgical procedures. Int. J. Medical Informatics 58--59, 71--85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. UNSPSC. Universal Standard Products and Services Classification (UNSPSC). http://eccma.org/unspsc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. WSDL. Web Service Description Language. http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A survey and analysis of Electronic Healthcare Record standards

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader