Penelope Sweetser
Peta Wyeth
Abstract
Although player enjoyment is central to computer games, there is currently no accepted model of player enjoyment in games. There are many heuristics in the literature, based on elements such as the game interface, mechanics, gameplay, and narrative. However, there is a need to integrate these heuristics into a validated model that can be used to design, evaluate, and understand enjoyment in games. We have drawn together the various heuristics into a concise model of enjoyment in games that is structured by flow. Flow, a widely accepted model of enjoyment, includes eight elements that, we found, encompass the various heuristics from the literature. Our new model, GameFlow, consists of eight elements -- concentration, challenge, skills, control, clear goals, feedback, immersion, and social interaction. Each element includes a set of criteria for achieving enjoyment in games. An initial investigation and validation of the GameFlow model was carried out by conducting expert reviews of two real-time strategy games, one high-rating and one low-rating, using the GameFlow criteria. The result was a deeper understanding of enjoyment in real-time strategy games and the identification of the strengths and weaknesses of the GameFlow model as an evaluation tool. The GameFlow criteria were able to successfully distinguish between the high-rated and low-rated games and identify why one succeeded and the other failed. We concluded that the GameFlow model can be used in its current form to review games; further work will provide tools for designing and evaluating enjoyment in games.
- Adams, E. 2004. The designer's notebook: Bad game designer, no Twinkie! Gamasutra} (June 2004). http://www.gamasutra.com/features/20040611/adams_01.shtml. Online Feb. 1, 2005.Google Scholar
- Artz, J. 1996. Computers and the quality of life: Assessing flow in information systems. Computers and Society 26, 3 (1996), 7-12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Blizzard 2002. Warcraft 3. http://www.blizzard.com/war3/. Online Feb. 1, 2005.Google Scholar
- Brown, E. and Cairns, P. 2004. A grounded investigation of game immersion. In Extended Abstracts of the 2004 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, New York, 1297-1300. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Church, D. 2002. Simulation, emulation, and the game design/development process. Presented at the Australian Game Developers Conference (Melbourne, Dec. 6-8, 2002).Google Scholar
- Cornett, S. 2004. The usability of massively multiplayer online roleplaying games: Designing for new users. In Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, New York, 703-710. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1990. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Perennial, New York.Google Scholar
- Denham, B. 2004. Toward an explication of media enjoyment: The synergy of social norms, viewing situations and program content. Communication Theory 14, 4 (2004), 370-387.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Desurvire, H., Caplan, M., and Toth, J.A. 2004. Using heuristics to evaluate the playability of games. In Extended Abstracts of the 2004 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, New York, 1509-1512. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Federoff, M. 2002. Heuristics and usability guidelines for the creation and evaluation of fun in video games. Unpublished thesis, Indiana Univ., Bloomington. http://www.melissafederoff.com/thesis.html. Online Feb. 1, 2005.Google Scholar
- Fullerton, T., Swain, C., and Hoffman, S. 2004. Improving player choices. Gamasutra (March 2004). http://www.gamasutra.com/features/20040310/fullerton_01.shtml. Online Feb. 1, 2005.Google Scholar
- GameRankings. 2004. http://www.gamerankings.com/. Online Feb. 1, 2005.Google Scholar
- Garneau, P. 2002. Emergence: Making games deeper. http://www.pagtech.com/ Articles/Emergence.html. Online July 24, 2003.Google Scholar
- Gee, J. P. 2004. Learning by design: Games as learning machines. Gamasutra (March 2004). Online Feb. 1, 2005. http://www.gamasutra.com/gdc2004/features/20040324/gee_01.shtml.Google Scholar
- Green, M., Brock, T., and Kaufman, G. 2004. Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory 14, 4 (2004), 311-327.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jennings, M. 2000. Theory and models for creating engaging and immersive ecommerce websites. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGCPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research. ACM, New York, 77-85. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johnson, D. and Wiles, J. 2003. Effective affective user interface design in games. Ergonomics 46, 13/14 (2003), 1332-1345.Google Scholar
- Juul, J. 2004. Working with the player's repertoire. Int. J. Intelligent Games and Simulation 3, 1 (2004), 54-61.Google Scholar
- Kane, B. 2003. Postcard from GDC 2003: 34 ways to put emotions into games. Gamasutra (March 2003). http://www.gamasutra.com/gdc2003/features/20030308/kane_emotion_01.htm. Online Feb. 1, 2005.Google Scholar
- Lazzaro, N. 2004. Why we play games: Four keys to more emotion without story. http://www.xeodesign.com/whyweplaygames/xeodesign_whyweplaygames.pdf. Online Feb. 1, 2005.Google Scholar
- Lazzaro, N. and Keeker, K. 2004. What's my method? A game show on games. In Extended Abstracts of the 2004 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, New York, 1093-1094. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nabi, R. and Krcmar, M. 2004. Conceptualising media enjoyment as attitude: implications for mass media effects research. Communication Theory 4, 14 (2004), 288-310.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Oliver, M. and Nabi, R. 2004. Exploring the concept of media enjoyment: An introduction to the special issue. Communication Theory 14, 4 (2004), 285-287.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pachet, F. and Addressi, A.R. 2004. Music: When children reflect on their own playing style: Experiments with continuator and children. Computers in Entertainment 2, 1 (2004), 14. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pagulayan, R., Keeker, K., Wixon, D., Romero, R., and Fuller, T. 2003. User-centered design in games. In The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Techniques and Emerging Applications. J. A. Jacko and A. Sears (eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 883-905. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Raney, A. 2004. Expanding disposition theory: Reconsidering character liking, moral evaluations, and enjoyment. Communication Theory 14, 4 (2004), 348-369.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sharafi, P., Hedman, L., and Montgomery, H. 2004. Using information technology: engagement modes, flow experience, and personality orientations.Google Scholar
- Smith, H. 1999. The three goals of the game designer. Gamasutra (April 1999). http://www.gamasutra.com/features/19990409/enemies_02.htm. Online Feb. 1, 2005.Google Scholar
- Smith, H. 2002. Systemic level design. In the Game Developers Conference (San Jose, CA, March 21-23, 2002).Google Scholar
- Sony. 2003. Lords of EverQuest. http://lordsofeverquest.station.sony.com/. Online Feb. 1, 2005.Google Scholar
- Sweetser, P. and Dennis, S. 2003. Facilitating learning in a real time strategy computer game. In Entertainment Computing: Technologies and Applications. R. Nakatsu and J. Hoshino (eds.). Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA, 49-56.Google Scholar
- Sweetser, P. and Johnson, D. 2004. Player-centred game environments: Assessing player opinions, experiences and issues. In Entertainment Computing - ICEC 2004: Third International Conference. LNCS 3166, Springer Verlag, New York, 321-332.Google Scholar
- Sweetser, P., Johnson, D., Sweetser, J., and Wiles, J. 2003. Creating engaging artificial characters for games. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Entertainment Computing. (Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vass, M., Carroll, J., and Shaffer, C.A. 2002. Supporting creativity in problem solving environments. In Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Creativity and Cognition. 31-37. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vorderer, P., Hartmann, T., and Klimmt, C. 2003. Explaining the enjoyment of playing video games: The role of competition. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computer Games (Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA). Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games
Recommendations
Pervasive game flow: understanding player enjoyment in pervasive gaming
Interactive entertainmentPlayer enjoyment is perhaps the most important issue in successful game design, but so far it has not been addressed in the area of pervasive games. Departing from the general gameflow model, this article presents an initial outline for a new model of ...
GameFlow in Different Game Genres and Platforms
Theoretical and Practical Computer Applications in EntertainmentThe GameFlow model strives to be a general model of player enjoyment, applicable to all game genres and platforms. Derived from a general set of heuristics for creating enjoyable player experiences, the GameFlow model has been widely used in evaluating ...
GameFlow heuristics for designing and evaluating real-time strategy games
IE '12: Proceedings of The 8th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment: Playing the SystemThe GameFlow model strives to be a general model of player enjoyment, applicable to all game genres and platforms. Derived from a general set of heuristics for creating enjoyable player experiences, the GameFlow model has been widely used in evaluating ...
Comments