Skip to main content
Log in

Role of Preconditioning and Recovery Time in Repeated Testing of Aortic Valve Tissues: Validation Through Quasilinear Viscoelastic Theory

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated how preconditioning history and specimen recovery time affect the accuracy of measurements of mechanical properties obtained from sequential, repeated materials testing of porcine aortic valve (PAV) cusps. Strain history protocols were modeled by quasilinear viscoelastic theory and the results compared with the experimental data. Assuming that the model was predictive, the accuracy of predicting experimental data was related to the suitability of the materials testing protocol. We found that the preconditioned state of the PAV material was not unique but was a function of the deformation history that had occurred before the preconditioning cycles. Preconditioning without an adequate rest period between tests increased predictive errors, whereas allowing the material to rest without preconditioning reduced errors. Modeling more of the strain history reduced errors for specimens briefly rested between tests but had no impact on specimens with long rest periods. The smallest predictive errors were obtained for a loading protocol with a 24 h specimen recovery period followed by material preconditioning. We recommend the use of this protocol for estimating material properties of PAV tissues. © 2000 Biomedical Engineering Society.

PAC00: 8719Rr, 8780-y

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Best, T. M., J. McElhaney, W. E. Garrett, Jr., and B. S. Myers.Characterization of the passive responses of live skeletal muscle using the quasi-linear theory of viscoelasticity. J. Biomech.27:413–419, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carew, E. O., E. A. Talman, D. R. Boughner, and I.Vesely. Quasi-Linear Viscoelastic theory applied to internal shearing of porcine aortic valve leaflets. J. Biomech. Eng.121:386–392, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fung, Y. C. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties ofLiving Tissues, 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 1993, pp. 277–292.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haut, R. C., and R.W. Little. A constitutive equation for collagen fibers. J. Biomech. 5:423–430, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huyghe, J. M., D. H. van Campen, T. Arts, and R. M. Heethaar. The constitutive behaviour ofpassive heart muscle tissue: A quasi-linear viscoelastic formulation. J. Biomech. 24:841–849, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kwan, M. K., T. H-C. Lin, and S. L-Y. Woo. On the viscoelastic properties of the anteromedialbundle of the anterior cruciate ligament. J. Biomech.26:447–452, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, J. M., D.W. Courtman, and D. R. Boughner. The glutaraldehyde-stabilized porcine aortic valve xenograft. I. Tensile viscoelastic properties of the fresh leaflet material. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.18:61–77, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Myers, B. S., J. H. McElhaney, and B. J. Doherty. The viscoelastic responses of the humancervical spine in torsion: experimental limitations of quasi-linear theory, and a method for reducing these effects. J. Biomech.24:811–817, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pinto, J. G., and P. J. Patitucci. Visco-elasticity ofpassive cardiac muscle. J. Biomech. Eng.102:57–61, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rousseau, E. P. M., A.A. H. J. Sauren, M. C. van Hout, and A. A. van Steenhoven. Elastic and viscoelastic material behaviour of fresh and glutaraldehyde-treated porcine aortic valve tissue. J. Biomech.16:339–348, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sauren, A. A. H. J., M. C. van Hout, A. A. van Steenhoven, F. E. Veldpaus, and J. D. Janssen.The mechanical properties of porcine aortic valve tissues. J. Biomech.16:327–337, 1983.

  12. Talman, E., and D. Boughner. Strain rate affects viscoelastic measurements on porcine aortic heartvalve tissue tested in shear. ASME Bioeng. Div. Publ. BED36:55–56, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vesely, I.A mechanism for the decrease in stiffness of bioprosthetic heart valve tissues after cross-linking. ASAIO J. 42:993–999, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vesely, I., and J. E. Barber. The role of tissue preconditioning inmeasuring stress relaxation behavior of heart valve tissues. Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress of Biomechanics, Sapporo, Japan, 1998, p. 193

  15. Vesely, I., and R. Brewer Preconditioningdoes not reset the strain history of uniaxially tested, porcine aortic valve tissues ASME Bioeng. Div. Publ. BED36:57–58, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vesely, I., and A. Lozon. Natural preload of aortic valve leafletcomponents during glutaraldehyde fixation: effects on tissue mechanics. J. Biomech.26:121–131, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Woo, S. L-Y., M. A. Gomez, and W. H. Akeson. The time and history-dependentviscoelastic properties of the canine medial collateral ligament. J. Biomech. Eng.103:293–298, 1981.

  18. Woo, S. L-Y., B. R. Simon, S. C. Kuei, and W. H. Akeson. Quasi-linear viscoelastic propertiesof normal articular cartilage. J. Biomech. Eng.102:85–90, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carew, E.O., Barber, J.E. & Vesely, I. Role of Preconditioning and Recovery Time in Repeated Testing of Aortic Valve Tissues: Validation Through Quasilinear Viscoelastic Theory. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 28, 1093–1100 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1310221

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1310221

Navigation