Skip to main content

Abstract

Quasi-experimental research methods widely used in health and social science research are often used to make causal inferences. Yet (with certain exceptions, for example, the regression discontinuity design, Cook and Campbell, 1979) their designs are often not sufficiently reliable to do so. Many quasi-experiments cannot ‘design-out’ potential bias, unlike randomised controlled trials. In this chapter we discuss the particular problems of the before and after study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2008 David J. Torgerson and Carole J. Torgerson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Torgerson, D.J., Torgerson, C.J. (2008). The Limitations of Before and After Designs. In: Designing Randomised Trials in Health, Education and the Social Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230583993_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics