Abstract
Palpable tension continues at the intersection of tobacco control and trade policy. Through consideration of four major tobacco control-related trade disputes, we suggest how to empower public health proponents in the face of entrenched economic policymaking norms. We argue that a more effective pro-tobacco control message should: (a) seek to be broadly consistent with core principles of the world trading system, (b) boldly assert countries’ international commitments to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, (c) marshal deep scientific evidence, and (d) come from a broad range of actors, including from low- and middle-income countries as well as from other trade policy community members.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Rosenbaum, L. and Lamas, D. (2011) Facing a ‘slow-motion disaster’ – The UN meeting on noncommunicable diseases. New England Journal of Medicine 365 (25): 2345–2348.
Yach, D., Hawkes, C., Gould, C. and Hofman, K. (2004) The global burden of chronic diseases. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 291 (21): 2616–2622.
World Health Organization. (2011) Conference of the Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: Decisions. Geneva: WHO.
Callard, C., Chitanondh, H. and Weissman, R. (2001) Why trade and investment liberalisation may threaten effective tobacco control efforts. Tobacco Control 10 (1): 68–70.
Honjo, K. and Kawachi, I. (2000) Effects of market liberalisation on smoking in Japan. Tobacco Control 9 (2): 193–200.
MacKenzie, R., Collin, J., Sriwongcharoen, H. and Muggli, M. (2004) ‘If we can just “stall” new unfriendly legislations, the scoreboard is already in our favour’: Transnational tobacco companies and ingredients disclosure in Thailand. Tobacco Control 13 (2): ii79–ii87.
Mamudu, H., Hammond, R. and Glantz, S. (2011) International trade versus public health during the FCTC negotiations, 1999–2003. Tobacco Control 20 (1): e3.
WTO. (2010) The Effect of Canada's Tobacco Act on Malawi. Geneva: WTO, (G/TBT/W/329).
WTO. (2010a) The Effect of Canada's ‘Tobacco Act’ on Kenya. Geneva: WTO, (G/TBT/W/330).
WTO. (2010b) The Effect of Canada's ‘Tobacco Act’ on Uganda. Geneva: WTO, (G/TBT/W/331).
TBT Committee. (2010a) Official minutes. Paragraph 223, November.
TBT Committee. (2010b) Official minutes. March.
WTO. (2010) Request for Consultations – US – Measures Affecting the Production and Sale of Clove Cigarettes. Geneva: WTO.
WTO. (2011) US – Measures Affecting the Production and Sale of Clove Cigarettes. Geneva: WTO. WTO Panel Report.
WTO. (2012) United States – Measures Affecting the Production and Sale of Clove Cigarettes. Geneva: WTO. Appellate Body Report.
Mitchell, A. (2010) Australia's move to the plain packaging of cigarettes and its WTO compatibility. Asian Journal of the World Trade Organization and International Health Law and Policy 5 (2): 399–419.
TBT Committee. (June 2011) Official minutes. Paragraph 21. Geneva: WTO.
TRIPS Council. (June 2011) Official minutes. Paragraphs 195–198. Geneva: WTO.
Shaffer, E. and Brenner, J. (2004) International trade agreements: Hazards to health? International Journal of Health Services 34 (3): 467–481.
Voon, T. and Mitchell, A. (2011) Time to quit? Assessing international investment claims against plain tobacco packaging in Australia. Journal of International Economic Law 14 (3): 515–552.
Taylor, A. (2004) Governing the globalization of public health. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 32 (3): 500–508.
WHO. (2011) WTO rules and the implementation of the WHO FCTC are not incompatible, http://www.who.int/fctc/wto_fctc/en/index.html, accessed 17 February 2012.
Faunce, T. and Townsend, R. (2011) The trans-pacific partnership agreement: Challenges for Australian health and medicine policies. The Medical Journal of Australia 194 (2): 83–86.
COMESA. (2010) Final Communiqué from the 14th Summit of COMESA, 1 September. Swaziland: COMESA.
Acknowledgements
We thank participants at the Population Health Sciences Seminar Series at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health for excellent input on this research. All errors, of course, remain ours.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Not surprisingly, treaties and trade policies are part of the environment that affects tobacco control efforts. The authors suggest that there are ways to make use of and overcome a trade environment that is potentially hostile to tobacco control.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Drope, J., Lencucha, R. Tobacco control and trade policy: Proactive strategies for integrating policy norms. J Public Health Pol 34, 153–164 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2012.36
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2012.36