Abstract
This study reports results from a randomised controlled trial of nurse-led care and was designed to determine whether nurse-led follow up improved patients morbidity and satisfaction with care in men treated with radical radiotherapy for prostate and bladder cancer. The aim was to compare outcomes in terms of toxicity, symptoms experienced, quality of life, satisfaction with care and health care costs, between those receiving nurse-led care and a group receiving standard care. The study population was of men prescribed radical radiotherapy (greater than 60 Gy). Participants completed self-assessment questionnaires for symptoms and quality of life within the first week of radiotherapy treatment, at week 3, 6 and 12 weeks from start of radiotherapy. Satisfaction with clinical care was also assessed at 12 weeks post-treatment. Observer-rated RTOG toxicity scores were recorded pre-treatment, weeks 1, 3, 6 and 12 weeks from start of radiotherapy. The results presented in this paper are on 115 of 132 (87%) of eligible men who agreed to enter the randomised trial. 6 men (4%) refused and 11 (8%) were missed for inclusion in the study. Data were analysed as a comparison at cross-sectional time points and as a general linear model using multiple regression. There was no significant difference in maximum symptom scores over the time of the trial between nurse-led follow-up care and conventional medical care. Differences were seen in scores in the initial self assessment of symptoms (week 1) that may have been as a result of early nursing intervention. Those men who had received nurse-led care were significantly more satisfied (P < 0.002) at 12 weeks and valued the continuity of the service provided. There were also significant (P < 0.001) cost benefits, with a 31% reduction in costs with nurse-led, compared to medically led care. Evidence from this study suggests that a specialist nurse is able to provide safe follow up for men undergoing radiotherapy. The intervention focused on coping with symptoms, and provided continuity of care and telephone support. Further work is required to improve the management of patients during and after radiotherapy. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Change history
16 November 2011
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
References
Aaronson N, Ahmedzai B, Bergman M, Bullinger A, Filbiberti H, Fletcher S, de Haes S, Klee D, Osoba D, Razavi B, Rofe S, Schraub K, Sneeuw M, Sullivan M and Takeda F (1993) The European Organisation for Research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: A quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in Oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85(5): 365–376
Brooker C and Butterworth T (1991) Working with families caring for a relative with schizophrenia: the evolving role of the community psychiatric nurse. Int J Nurs Stud 28(2): 189–200
Brooten D, Kumar S, Brown L, Butts P, Finkler S, Bakewell-Sachs S and Gibbons A Delivoria-Papadopoulos (1986) A randomised clinical trial of early hospital discharge and home follow-up of very low birth weight infants. New Engl J Med 315(15): 934–939
Brown S and Grimes D (1993) ‘A meta-analysis of clinical care; clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness of nurses in primary care roles, nurse practitioners and certified nurse midwives’. Washington DC, American Nurses Association
Campbell J, German L and Dodwell D (2000) Radiotherapy outpatient review: A nurse-led clinic. Clin Oncol 12: 104–107
Cox J, Stetz J and Pajak T (1995) Toxicity criteria of the radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) and the European Organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31(5): 1341–1346
Faithfull S (1995) Just grin and bear it and hope that it will go away: coping with urinary symptoms from pelvic radiotherapy. Euro J Cancer Care 4: 158–165
James N, Guerrero D and Brada M (1994) Who should follow up cancer patients? Nurse specialist based outpatient care and the introduction of a phone clinic system. Clin Oncol 6: 283–287
Kemmler G, Holzner B and Kopp M (1999) Comparison of two quality of life instruments for cancer patients: the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire-C30. J Clin Oncol 17: 2932–2940
Mathews J, Altman D, Campbell M and Royston P (1990) Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. Brit Med J 300: 230–235
Norcross Weintraub F and Hagopian A (1990) The effect of nursing consultation on anxiety, side-effects, and self care of patients receiving radiation therapy. Oncol Nurs Forum 17(3): 31–38
Richardson G and Maynard A (1995) ‘Fewer doctors? More nurses? A review of the knowledge base of doctor-nurse substitution’. York, University of York
Ridsdale L, Robins D, Cryer C and Williams H (1997) Feasability and effect of nurse run clinics for patients with epilepsy in general practice: randomised controlled trial. Brit Med J 314: 120–122
Rotman M, Rogow L, DeLeon G and Heskel N (1977) Supportive therapy in radiation oncology. Cancer 39: 744–750
Steinberg M and Rose C (1996) Posttreatment follow-up of radiation oncology patients in a managed care environment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 35(1): 113–116
Strohl R (1988) The nursing role in radiation oncology symptom management of acute and chronic reactions. Oncol Nurs Forum 15(4): 429–434
Thomas L and MacMillan J (1995) ‘Obtaining patients’ views of nursing care to inform the development of a patient satisfaction scale. Intern J Qual Health Care 2(2): 153–163
Yates B (1998) Formative evaluation of costs, cost-effectiveness, and cost benefit: toward cost -procedures-process. in Bickman L and Rog D (eds). Handbook of applied social research methods, London, Sage publications
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Faithfull, S., Corner, J., Meyer, L. et al. Evaluation of nurse-led follow up for patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy. Br J Cancer 85, 1853–1864 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.2173
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.2173
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
The oncology nurse coordinator: role perceptions of staff members and nurse coordinators
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research (2017)
-
Nurse-led follow-up of patients after oesophageal or gastric cardia cancer surgery: a randomised trial
British Journal of Cancer (2009)
-
Follow-up care for men with prostate cancer and the role of primary care: a systematic review of international guidelines
British Journal of Cancer (2009)
-
A mixed-method evaluation of nurse-led community-based supportive cancer care
Supportive Care in Cancer (2008)
-
Is DRE essential for the follow up of prostate cancer patients? A prospective audit of 194 patients
BMC Urology (2005)