Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of fat and lean masses in subjects with eating disorders

International Journal of Obesity volume 28, pages 912–919 (2004)Cite this article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to use a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer (DXA) to examine the total-body and regional fat and lean composition of soft tissue in subjects with and without eating disorders initially and after weight change. It was necessary also to study the effects of differences of calibration of different models of DXA scanner.

DESIGN: A total of 175 women with eating disorders, including anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa, and 43 age-matched controls were measured for soft-tissue composition with a pencil-beam Hologic QDR 1000W scanner and results converted to be equivalent to those from a fan-beam Hologic QDR 4500A, using previously determined crosscalibration factors. Some measurements were repeated at 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS: The baseline body composition of the patients covered a continuous range of fat proportions. Implausibly low fat proportions in some of the AN subjects were corrected by conversion to 4500 equivalents. The relationship between total lean mass and fat mass could be fitted equally well by a linear or linear/log regression. The relationship between leg and trunk fat was best fitted by a polynomial regression. There were weight changes in either direction in some of the subjects. The fat proportion in the total changed mass was a mean of 55%, higher in the legs and lower in the trunk, but not different between weight gainers and losers or clinical groups. The proportion was dependent on the initial fat proportion.

CONCLUSIONS: Relatively small differences in fat/lean calibration of DXA scanners may lead to anomalous results in very anorexic subjects and corrections are necessary in comparing results from different instruments. Concerns expressed about preferential trunk fat accumulation during weight recovery are not well founded. Previous claims of a relationship between fat proportion in regained weight and the amount of the weight gain are not justified.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Orphanidou CJ, McCargar LJ, Birmingham CL, Belzberg AS . Changes in body composition and fat distribution after short-term weight gain in patients with anorexia nervosa. Am J Clin Nutr 1997; 65: 1034–1041.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Iketani T, Kiriike N, Nagata T, Yamagami S . Altered body fat distribution after recovery of weight in patients with anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord 1999; 26: 275–282.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Scalfi L, Polito A, Bianchi L, Marra M, Caldara A, Nicolai E, Contaldo F . Body composition changes in patients with anorexia nervosa after complete weight recovery. Eur J Clin Nutr 2002; 56: 15–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Grinspoon S, Thomas L, Miller K, Pitts S, Herzog D, Klibanski A . Changes in regional fat distribution and the effects of estrogen during spontaneous weight gain in women with anorexia nervosa. Am J Clin Nutr 2001; 73: 865–869.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Forbes GB . Lean body mass—body fat interrelationships in humans. Nutr Rev 1987; 45: 225–231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tothill P, Hannan WJ, Wilkinson S . Comparisons between a pencil beam and two fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiomers used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue. Br J Radiol 2001; 74: 166–176.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tothill P, Avenell A, Reid DM . Precision and accuracy of measurements of whole-body bone mineral: comparisons between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers. Br J Radiol 1994; 67: 1210–1217.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tothill P, Avenell A, Love J, Reid DM . Comparisons between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers used for whole-body soft tissue measurements. Eur J Clin Nutr 1994; 48: 781–794.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pritchard JE, Nowson CA, Strauss BJ, Carlson JS, Kaymakci B, Wark JD . Evaluation of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry as a method of measurement of body fat. Eur J Clin Nutr 1993; 47: 216–228.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Loan MD, Keim NL, Berg K, Mayclin PL . Evaluation of body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and two different software packages. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27: 587–591.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Patel R, Blake GM, Herd RJM, Fogelman I . The effect of weight change on DXA scans in a 2-year trial of etidronate therapy. Calcif Tissue Int 1997; 61: 693–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Prior BM, Cureton KJ, Modlesky C, Evans EM, Sloniger MA, Saunders M, Lewis RD . In vivo validation of whole-body composition estimates from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Appl Physiol 1997; 83: 623–630.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Visser M, Fuerst T, Lang T, Salamone L, Harris TB . Validity of fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for measuring fat-free mass and leg muscle mass. J Appl Physiol 1999; 87: 1513–1520.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Salamone LM, Fuerst T, Visser M, Kern M, Lang T, Dockrell M, Cauley JA, Nevitt M, Tylavsky F, Lohman TG . Measurement of fat mass using DEXA: a validation study in elderly adults. J Appl Physiol 2000; 89: 345–352.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tothill P, Hannan WJ, Cowen S, Freeman CP . Anomalies in the measurement of total-body bone mineral by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry during weight change. J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12: 1908–1921.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tothill P, Laskey MA, Orphanidou CI . Anomalies in dual-energy absorptiometry measurements of total-body bone mineral during weight change using Lunar, Hologic and Norland instruments. Br J Radiol 1999; 72: 661–669.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stewart AD, Hannan WJ . Prediction of fat and fat-free mass in male athletes using dual X-ray absorptiometry as the reference method. J Sports Sci 2000; 18: 263–274.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tylavsky FA, Lohman TG, Dockrell M, Lang T, Schoeller DA, Wan JY, Fuerst T, Cauley JA, Nevitt M, Harris TB . Comparison of the effectiveness of 2 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers with that of total body water and computed tomography in assessing changes in body composition during weight change. Am J Clin Nutr 2003; 77: 356–363.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Forbes GB . The companionship of fat and lean. In: Ellis KJ, Eastman JD (eds). Human body composition. Plenum Press: New York; 1993. pp 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mazess RB, Barden HS, Ohlrich ES . Skeletal and body composition effects of anorexia nervosa. Am J Clin Nutr 1990; 52: 438–441.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Prentice AM, Jebb SA, Goldberg GR, Coward WA, Murgatroid PR, Poppitt SD, Cole TJ . Effects of weight cycling on body composition. Am J Clin Nutr 1992; 56: 209S–216S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mayer L . Body composition and anorexia nervosa: does physiology explain psychology? Am J Clin Nutr 2001; 73: 851–852.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kvist H, Chowdhury B, Grangard U, Tylen U, Sjostrom L . Total and visceral adipose-tissue volumes derived from measurements with computed tomography in adult men and women: predictive equations. Am J Clin Nutr 1988; 48: 1351–1361.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr CP Freeman for permission to use the data from the eating disorders study, to Dr Rob Elton for statistical advice, to Dr Jane Morris for useful discussions and to Maisie Gard, Karen McPhail, Stephen Cowen and Carol Millar for skilled technical assistance. The eating disorders study was funded by the Scottish Home and Health Department.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Physics, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK

    P Tothill & W James Hannan

Authors
  1. P Tothill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W James Hannan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P Tothill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tothill, P., James Hannan, W. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of fat and lean masses in subjects with eating disorders. Int J Obes 28, 912–919 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802536

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802536

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links