Abstract
In vitro models of normal mammary epithelium have correlated increased extracellular matrix (ECM) stiffness with malignant phenotypes. However, the role of increased stiffness in this transformation remains unclear because of difficulties in controlling ECM stiffness, composition and architecture independently. Here we demonstrate that interpenetrating networks of reconstituted basement membrane matrix and alginate can be used to modulate ECM stiffness independently of composition and architecture. We find that, in normal mammary epithelial cells, increasing ECM stiffness alone induces malignant phenotypes but that the effect is completely abrogated when accompanied by an increase in basement-membrane ligands. We also find that the combination of stiffness and composition is sensed through β4 integrin, Rac1, and the PI3K pathway, and suggest a mechanism in which an increase in ECM stiffness, without an increase in basement membrane ligands, prevents normal α6β4 integrin clustering into hemidesmosomes.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bissell, M. J. & Hines, W. C. Why don’t we get more cancer? A proposed role of the microenvironment in restraining cancer progression. Nature Med. 17, 320–329 (2011).
Paszek, M. J. et al. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell 8, 241–254 (2005).
Levental, K. R. et al. Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling. Cell 139, 891–906 (2009).
Boyd, N. F., Lockwood, G. A., Byng, J. W., Tritchler, D. L. & Yaffe, M. J. Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 7, 1133–1144 (1998).
Petersen, O., Ronnov-Jessen, L., Howlett, A. & Bissell, M. Interaction with basement membrane serves to rapidly distinguish growth and differentiation pattern of normal and malignant human breast epithelial cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 9064–9068 (1992).
Debnath, J. & Brugge, J. S. Modelling glandular epithelial cancers in three-dimensional cultures. Nature Rev. Cancer 5, 675–688 (2005).
Weaver, V. M. et al. Reversion of the malignant phenotype of human breast cells in three-dimensional culture and in vivo by integrin blocking antibodies. J. Cell Biol. 137, 231–245 (1997).
Provenzano, P. P., Inman, D. R., Eliceiri, K. W. & Keely, P. J. Matrix density-induced mechanoregulation of breast cell phenotype, signaling and gene expression through a FAK-ERK linkage. Oncogene 28, 4326–4343 (2009).
Giancotti, F. G. Integrin signaling. Science 285, 1028–1033 (1999).
Engler, A. et al. Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. Biophys. J. 86, 617–628 (2004).
Brownfield, D. G. et al. Patterned collagen fibers orient branching mammary epithelium through distinct signaling modules. Curr. Biol. 23, 703–709 (2013).
Nguyen-Ngoc, K-V. et al. ECM microenvironment regulates collective migration and local dissemination in normal and malignant mammary epithelium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2595–E2604 (2012).
Wozniak, M. A., Desai, R., Solski, P. A., Der, C. J. & Keely, P. J. ROCK-generated contractility regulates breast epithelial cell differentiation in response to the physical properties of a three-dimensional collagen matrix. J. Cell Biol. 163, 583–595 (2003).
Egeblad, M., Rasch, M. G. & Weaver, V. M. Dynamic interplay between the collagen scaffold and tumor evolution. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 22, 697–706 (2010).
Lo, C-M., Wang, H-B., Dembo, M. & Wang, Y. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys. J. 79, 144–152 (2000).
Engler, A., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. & Discher, D. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126, 677–689 (2006).
Yeung, T. et al. Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. Cell. Motil. Cytoskeleton 60, 24–34 (2005).
Discher, D. E., Janmey, P. & Wang, Y-L. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310, 1139–1143 (2005).
Lee, K. et al. Matrix compliance regulates Rac1b localization, NADPH oxidase assembly, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Mol. Biol. Cell 23, 4097–4108 (2012).
Peyton, S. R., Raub, C. B., Keschrumrus, V. P. & Putnam, A. J. The use of poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels to investigate the impact of ECM chemistry and mechanics on smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 27, 4881–4893 (2006).
Huebsch, N. et al. Harnessing traction-mediated manipulation of the cell/matrix interface to control stem-cell fate. Nature Mater. 9, 518–526 (2010).
Ulrich, T. A., Jain, A., Tanner, K., MacKay, J. L. & Kumar, S. Probing cellular mechanobiology in three-dimensional culture with collagen-agarose matrices. Biomaterials 31, 1875–1884 (2010).
Khetan, S. et al. Degradation-mediated cellular traction directs stem cell fate in covalently crosslinked three-dimensional hydrogels. Nature Mater. 12, 458–465 (2013)
Mammoto, A. et al. A mechanosensitive transcriptional mechanism that controls angiogenesis. Nature 457, 1103–1108 (2009).
Boyd-White, J. & Williams, J. C. Effect of cross-linking on matrix permeability: A model for age-modified basement membranes. Diabetes 45, 348–353 (1996).
Drumheller, P. D., Elbert, D. L. & Hubbell, J. A. Multifunctional poly(ethylene glycol) semi-interpenetrating polymer networks as highly selective adhesive substrates for bioadhesive peptide grafting. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 43, 772–780 (1994).
Bearinger, J. P. et al. P(AAm-co-EG) interpenetrating polymer networks grafted to oxide surfaces: Surface characterization, protein adsorption, and cell detachment studies. Langmuir 13, 5175–5183 (1997).
Elisseeff, J. et al. Photoencapsulation of chondrocytes in poly(ethylene oxide)-based semi-interpenetrating networks. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 51, 164–171 (2000).
Gong, J. P., Katsuyama, Y., Kurokawa, T. & Osada, Y. Double-network hydrogels with extremely high mechanical strength. Adv. Mater. 15, 1155–1158 (2003).
Park, Y. D., Tirelli, N. & Hubbell, J. A. Photopolymerized hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels and interpenetrating networks. Biomaterials 24, 893–900 (2003).
Li, Y. J., Chung, E. H., Rodriguez, R. T., Firpo, M. T. & Healy, K. E. Hydrogels as artificial matrices for human embryonic stem cell self-renewal. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 79, 1–5 (2006).
Buxton, A. N. et al. Design and characterization of poly(ethylene glycol) photopolymerizable semi-interpenetrating networks for chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng. 13, 2549–2560 (2007).
Rowley, J. A., Madlambayan, G. & Mooney, D. J. Alginate hydrogels as synthetic extracellular matrix materials. Biomaterials 20, 45–53 (1999).
Kong, H. J., Kim, C. J., Huebsch, N., Weitz, D. & Mooney, D. J. Noninvasive probing of the spatial organization of polymer chains in hydrogels using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 4518–4519 (2007).
Kleinman, H. K. et al. Isolation and characterization of type IV procollagen, laminin, and heparan sulfate proteoglycan from the EHS sarcoma . Biochemistry 21, 6188–6193 (1982).
Tanner, K., Mori, H., Mroue, R., Bruni-Cardoso, A. & Bissell, M. J. Coherent angular motion in the establishment of multicellular architecture of glandular tissues. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 1973–1978 (2012).
Tse, J. M. et al. Mechanical compression drives cancer cells toward invasive phenotype. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 911–916 (2012).
Yuan, T. L. & Cantley, L. C. PI3K pathway alterations in cancer: variations on a theme. Oncogene 27, 5497–5510 (2008).
Ali, S. & Coombes, R. C. Estrogen receptor α in human breast cancer: occurrence and significance. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 5, 271–281 (2000).
Sun, M. et al. Phosphatidylinositol-3-OH Kinase (PI3K)/AKT2, activated in breast cancer, regulates and is induced by estrogen receptor α (ERα) via interaction between ERα and PI3K. Cancer Res. 61, 5985–5991 (2001).
Humphries, J. D., Byron, A. & Humphries, M. J. Integrin ligands at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 119, 3901–3903 (2006).
Niessen, C. M. et al. The α6β4 integrin is a receptor for both laminin and kalinin. Exp. Cell Res. 211, 360–367 (1994).
Lee, E. C., Lotz, M. M., Steele, G. D. Jr & Mercurio, A. M. The integrin α6β4 is a laminin receptor. J. Cell Biol. 117, 671–678 (1992).
Spinardi, L., Einheber, S., Cullen, T., Milner, T. A. & Giancotti, F. G. A recombinant tail-less integrin β 4 subunit disrupts hemidesmosomes, but does not suppress α6β4-mediated cell adhesion to laminins. J. Cell Biol. 129, 473–487 (1995).
Litjens, S. H. M., de Pereda, J. M. & Sonnenberg, A. Current insights into the formation and breakdown of hemidesmosomes. Trends Cell Biol. 16, 376–383 (2006).
Underwood, J. M. et al. The ultrastructure of MCF-10A acini. J. Cell. Physiol. 208, 141–148 (2006).
Marinkovich, M. P. Tumour microenvironment: Laminin 332 in squamous-cell carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Cancer 7, 370–380 (2007).
Giancotti, F. G. Targeting integrin β4 for cancer and anti-angiogenic therapy. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 28, 506–511 (2007).
Shaw, L. M., Rabinovitz, I., Wang, H. H., Toker, A. & Mercurio, A. M. Activation of phosphoinositide 3-OH kinase by the α6β4 integrin promotes carcinoma invasion. Cell 91, 949–960 (1997).
Liu, H., Radisky, D. C., Wang, F. & Bissell, M. J. Polarity and proliferation are controlled by distinct signaling pathways downstream of PI3-kinase in breast epithelial tumor cells. J. Cell Biol. 164, 603–612 (2004).
Geuijen, C. A. W. & Sonnenberg, A. Dynamics of the α6β4 integrin in keratinocytes. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 3845–3858 (2002).
Hakkinen, K. M., Harunaga, J. S., Doyle, A. D. & Yamada, K. M. Direct comparisons of the morphology, migration, cell adhesions, and actin cytoskeleton of fibroblasts in four different three-dimensional extracellular matrices. Tissue Eng. Part A 17, 713–724 (2011).
Leung, C. T. & Brugge, J. S. Outgrowth of single oncogene-expressing cells from suppressive epithelial environments. Nature 482, 410–413 (2012).
Bilodeau, G. G. Regular pyramid punch problem. J. Appl. Mech. 59, 519–523 (1992).
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the help of A. Li, D. Klumpers, A. Mao and other members of the Mooney lab. The authors also thank J. Brugge (Harvard Medical School) for providing the β4-integrin and Rac1 mutant plasmids, L. Lichten (Qiagen) for help with RNA arrays, Louise Jawerth/Weitz lab for help/use of the rheometer, M. Ericsson and L. Trakimas of the Harvard Medical School EM facility for help with transmission electron microscopy, P. Mali (Harvard Medical School) for discussions, and the Bauer Core for flow sorting. This work was supported by an NIH F32 grant to O.C. (CA153802), fellowships from NSERC and HHMI for S.T.K., fellowships from FCT, FCG and FLAD for C.B.d.C., and NIH (R01EB015498) and MRSEC (DMR-0820484) grants to D.J.M. This work was performed in part at the Center for Nanoscale Systems (CNS), a member of the National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (NNIN).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
O.C. and D.J.M. designed the IPNs. O.C., S.T.K. and D.J.M. designed the experiments. O.C., S.T.K., C.B.d.C., J-W.S. and C.S.V. conducted experiments and analysed data. C.B.d.C. designed and conducted the RNA expression arrays. K.H.A. conducted the comparison of in vitro results to human-breast-cancer samples. O.C., S.T.K., C.B.d.C. and D.J.M. wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information (PDF 2298 kb)
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Movie 1 (AVI 1419 kb)
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Movie 2 (AVI 717 kb)
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Movie 3 (AVI 959 kb)
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Movie 4 (AVI 860 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chaudhuri, O., Koshy, S., Branco da Cunha, C. et al. Extracellular matrix stiffness and composition jointly regulate the induction of malignant phenotypes in mammary epithelium. Nature Mater 13, 970–978 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4009
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4009
This article is cited by
-
Breaking through the basement membrane barrier to improve nanotherapeutic delivery to tumours
Nature Nanotechnology (2024)
-
Cell volume expansion and local contractility drive collective invasion of the basement membrane in breast cancer
Nature Materials (2023)
-
Matrix viscoelasticity controls spatiotemporal tissue organization
Nature Materials (2023)
-
Carcinoma-associated fibroblast-derived lysyl oxidase-rich extracellular vesicles mediate collagen crosslinking and promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition via p-FAK/p-paxillin/YAP signaling
International Journal of Oral Science (2023)
-
The laminin–keratin link shields the nucleus from mechanical deformation and signalling
Nature Materials (2023)