Abstract
Objective:
To assess the public support for potential legislation to prohibit weight-based discrimination against obese individuals in the United States, and to examine whether certain message frames about weight discrimination influence public support.
Design:
Participants were randomly assigned to read one of the four paragraphs that framed the topic of weight discrimination in a distinct way (or a control condition with no paragraph). Participants were then asked to indicate their level of support for six antidiscrimination laws.
Subjects:
A national sample of 1114 participants (48% women, 52% men), mean age 44.78 years (s.d.=15.93).
Results:
There was moderate support for several laws to prohibit weight-based discrimination, but gender differences were observed across experimental conditions indicating that some message frames may increase support for certain laws among women, but not men. However, message frames had no effect on support for laws with specific provisions to prohibit weight discrimination in the workplace, suggesting that public support for these particular legal measures is consistent and high (65% of men and 81% of women expressed support) regardless of how the issue of weight discrimination is framed to the public.
Conclusion:
The present findings provide evidence of current levels of public support for legislation to prohibit weight-based discrimination, and offer potential ways for policy makers and interest groups to communicate messages about weight discrimination in efforts to increase support.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Puhl RM, Brownell KD . Bias, discrimination, and obesity. Obes Res 2001; 9: 788–905.
Puhl RM, Heuer CA . The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Obesity 2009; 17: 941–964.
Andreyeva T, Puhl RM, Brownell KD . Changes in perceived weight discrimination among Americans: 1995-1996 through 2004-2006. Obesity 2008; 16: 1129–1134.
Puhl RM, Andreyeva T, Brownell KD . Perceptions of weight discrimination: prevalence and comparison to race and gender discrimination in America. Int J Obes 2008; 32: 992–1000.
Crandall CS . Prejudice against fat people: ideology and self-interest. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994; 66: 882–894.
Crandall CS, Martinez R . Culture, ideology, and anti-fat attitudes. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1996; 22: 1165–1176.
Crandall CS, Schiffhauer KL . Anti-fat prejudice: beliefs, values, and American culture. Obes Res 1998; 6: 458–460.
Weiner B, Perry RP, Magnusson J . An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. J Pers Soc Psychol 1988; 55: 738–748.
Puhl RM, Latner JD . Stigma, obesity, and the health of the nation's children. Psychol Bull 2007; 133: 557–580.
Vartanian LR, Shaprow JG . Effects of weight stigma on exercise motivation and behavior: a preliminary investigation among college-aged females. J Health Psychol 2008; 13: 131–138.
Puhl RM, Heuer CA . Obesity stigma: important considerations for public health. Am J Public Health 2010; 100: 1019–1028.
Puhl RM, Brownell KD . Confronting and coping with weight stigma: an investigation of overweight and obese adults. Obesity 2006; 14: 1802–1815.
Roehling MV, Roehling PV, Pichler S . The relationship between body weight and perceived weight-related employment discrimination: the role of sex and race. J Vocat Behav 2007; 71: 300–318.
Carr D, Friedman MA . Is obesity stigmatizing? body weight, perceived discrimination, and psychological well-being in the United States. J Health Soc Behav 2005; 46: 244–259.
Rudolph CW, Wells CL, Weller MD, Baltes BB . A meta-analysis of empirical studies of weight-based bias in the workplace. J Vocat Behav 2009; 74: 1–10.
Roehling MV, Pilcher S, Oswald F, Bruce T . The effects of weight bias on job-related outcomes: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. In: Academy of Management Annual Meeting. Anahiem: CA, 2008.
O’Brien KS, Halberstadt J, Hunter JA, Anderson J, Caputi P . Do antifat attitudes predict antifat behaviors? Obesity 2008; (Suppl 2): S87–S92.
Baum CL, Ford WF . The wage effects of obesity: a longitudinal study. Health Econ 2004; 13: 885–899.
Cawley J . The impact of obesity on wages. J Human Resour 2004; 39: 451–474.
Maranto CL, Stenoien AF . Weight discrimination: a multidisciplinary analysis. Employee Responsibilities Rights J 2000; 12: 9–24.
Klarenbach S, Padwal R, Chuck A, Jacobs P . Population-based analysis of obesity a workforce participation. Obesity 2006; 14: 920–927.
Tunceli K, Kemeng L, Williams LK . Long-term effects of obesity on employment and work limitations among U.S. adults 1986-1999. Obesity 2006; 14: 1637–1646.
DanÃelsdóttir S, O’Brien KS, Ciao A . Anti-fat prejudice reduction: a review of published studies. Obes Facts 2010; 3: 47–58.
Theran EE . Legal theory on weight discrimination. In: Brownell KD, Puhl RM, Schwartz MB, Rudd L, (eds). Weight Bias: Nature, Consequences, and Remedies. Guilford Press: New York, 2005.
Pomeranz JL . A historical analysis of public health, the law, and stigmatized social groups: the need for both obesity and weight bias legislation. Obesity 2008; 16: S93–S102.
Kirkland A . Fat rights: Dilemmas of Difference and Personhood. New York University Press: New York, 2008.
Puhl RM, Heuer CA . Public opinion about laws to prohibit weight discrimination in the United States. Obesity (silver spring) 2010, (e-pub ahead of print 27 May 2010), PMID: 20508626.
Barry CL, Brescoll VL, Brownell KD, Schlesinger M . Obesity metaphors: how beliefs about the causes of obesity affect support for public policy. Milbank Q 2009; 87: 7–47.
Oliver JE, Lee T . Public opinion and the politics of obesity in America. J Health Polit Policy Law 2005; 30: 923–954.
Tversky A, Kahneman D . Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 1974; 185: 1124–1131.
Tversky A, Kahneman D . The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981; 211: 453–458.
Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity. Weight bias: A Social Justice Issue: A Policy Brief, 2009, http://www.yaleruddcenter.org/resources/upload/docs/what/reports/RuddBriefWeightBias2009.pdf (accessed 12 June, 2010).
National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance. NAAFA Size Diversity Toolkit, 2009.
First do no harm: real stories of fat prejudice in health care. (accessed 4 May, 2010, at http://fathealth.wordpress.com/).
Associated Press. AMA objects to calling obesity a disability. 16 June 2009. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31395226/ (accessed 20 July, 2010).
Obesity Action Coalition. Statement on Obesity as a Disability. 17 June, 2009. http://www.obesityaction.org/news/2009/Statement%20from%20Obesity%20Action%20Coalition%20Executive%20Director%20Joseph%20Nadglowski%20%20June%2017,%202009.pdf (accessed 20 August, 2010).
Brownell KD, Kersh R, Ludwig DS, Post RC, Puhl RM, Schwartz MB et al. Personal responsibility and obesity: a constructive approach to a controversial issue. Health Aff 2010; 29: 379–387.
Lawrence RG . Framing obesity: the evolution of news discourse on a public health issue. Int J Press/Politics 2004; 9: 56–75.
Kim S-H, Willis LA . Talking about obesity: news framing of who is responsible for causing and fixing the problem. J Health Commun 2007; 12: 359–376.
Bonfiglioli MF, Smith BJ, King LA, Chapman SF, Holding SJ . Choice and voice: obesity debates in television news. Med J Aust 2007; 187: 442–445.
Franz MJ, VanWormer JJ, Crain AL, Boucher JL, Histon T, Caplan W et al. Weight-loss outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight-loss clinical trials with a minimus 1-year follow-up. J Am Diet Assoc 2007; 107: 1755–1767.
Powell LH, Calvin JE, Calvin JE . Effective obesity treatments. Am Psychol 2007; 62: 234–246.
Mann T, Tomiyama AJ, Westling E, Lew A-M, Samuels B, Chatman J . Medicare's search for effective obesity treatments. Am Psychol 2007; 62: 220–233.
Tsai AG, Wadden TA . Systematic review: an evaluation of major commercial weight loss programs in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 56–66.
Oranzo AJ, Scott JG . Diagnosis and treatment of obesity in adults: an applied evidence-based review. J Am Board Fam Pract 2004; 17: 359–369.
Haidt J, Graham J . When morality opposes justice: conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Soc Justice Res 2007; 20: 1573–6725.
Crandall CS . Ideology and lay theories of stigma: the justification of stigmatization. In: Heatherton TF, Kleck RE, Hebl MR, Hull JG, (eds). The Social Psychology of Stigma. Guilford Press: New York, 2000; 126–152.
Puhl RM, Brownell KD . Ways of coping with obesity stigma: conceptual review and analysis. Eating Behav 2003; 4: 53–78.
Schwartz MB, Vartanian LR, Nosek BA, Brownell KD . The influence of one's own body weight on implicit and explicit anti-fat bias. Obesity 2006; 14: 440–447.
Crandall CS, Biernat M . The ideology of anti-fat attitudes. J Appl Soc Psychol 1990; 20: 227–243.
Crandall CS, D’Anello S, Sakalli N, Lazarus E, Nejtardt GW, Feather NT . An attribution-value model of prejudice: anti-fat attitudes in six nations. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2001; 27: 30–37.
Puhl RM, Brownell KD . Psychosocial origins of obesity stigma: toward changing a powerful and pervasive bias. Obes Rev 2003; 4: 213–227.
Defining overweight obesity 2008 (accessed 18 November, 2008, at http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/obesity/defining.htm).
Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM . Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004. JAMA 2006; 295: 1549–1555.
Puhl RM, Schwartz MB, Brownell KD . Impact of perceived consensus on stereotypes about obese people: a new approach for reducing bias. Health Psychol 2005; 24: 517–525.
Puhl RM, Heuer CA . Framing messages related to weight discrimination. unpublished manuscript.
Puhl RM, Moss-Racusin CA, Schwartz MB . Internalization of weight bias: implications for binge eating and emotional well-being. Obesity 2007; 15: 19–23.
Durso LE, Latner JD . Understanding self-directed stigma: development of the weight bias internalization scale. Obesity 2008; 16: S80–S86.
Gorber SC, Tremblay M, Moher D, Gorber B . A comparison of direct vs self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: A systematic review. Obes Rev 2007; 9: 307–326.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity at the Yale University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Puhl, R., Heuer, C. & Sarda, V. Framing messages about weight discrimination: impact on public support for legislation. Int J Obes 35, 863–872 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2010.194
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2010.194
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Weight stigma in healthcare settings: the experience of Arab and Jewish bariatric surgery candidates in Israel
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research (2024)
-
International comparisons of weight stigma: addressing a void in the field
International Journal of Obesity (2021)
-
Group cognitive-behavioral treatment for internalized weight stigma: a pilot study
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity (2018)
-
The Role of Stigma in Weight Loss Maintenance Among U.S. Adults
Annals of Behavioral Medicine (2017)
-
Weight bias: a call to action
Journal of Eating Disorders (2016)