Abstract
To elucidate processes in the osteoclastic bone resorption, visualise resorption and related actin reorganisation, a combination of imaging technologies and an applicable in vitro model is needed. Nanosized bone powder from matching species is deposited on any biocompatible surface in order to form a thin, translucent, smooth and elastic representation of injured bone. Osteoclasts cultured on the layer expressed matching morphology to ones cultured on sawed cortical bone slices. Resorption pits were easily identified by reflectance microscopy. The coating allowed actin structures on the bone interface to be visualised with super-resolution microscopy along with a detailed interlinked actin networks and actin branching in conjunction with V-ATPase, dynamin and Arp2/3 at actin patches. Furthermore, we measured the timescale of an adaptive osteoclast adhesion to bone by force spectroscopy experiments on live osteoclasts with bone-coated AFM cantilevers. Utilising the in vitro model and the advanced imaging technologies we localised immunofluorescence signals in respect to bone with high precision and detected resorption at its early stages. Put together, our data supports a cyclic model for resorption in human osteoclasts.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Bone remodelling is required for replacement of old bone with new; in order to sustain the biological function of the tissue, to repair damaged foci and to maintain Ca2+ homeostasis1,2. Imbalance in the remodelling leads to diseases like osteoporosis. Studies of osteoclast (OC) activities have been carried out on substrates like glass, plastic, hydroxyapatite, cortical bone slices and dentin; and depending on culture substrate the OCs exhibit different morphology3,4. All cells adapt to and are influenced by the physical and chemical properties of their surroundings and constantly probe and extract information from the extracellular matrix (ECM)5,6. Several reports have examined the role of biological components7, chemical composition8, crystal structure and grain size of biomaterials9 and their effect on OC bone resorption10,11,12,13. Many bone components have been shown to promote formation resorption-indicating structures in OC cultures3,8, but recent studies have identified circumstances questioning the relevance of these observations14,15. The experimental environment in vitro used to study a biological process should mimic the in vivo microenvironment to justify extrapolation of the results of an experiment back to the appropriate biological context16. In bone biology, it is often impossible to visualise protein localisation and processes in calcified matrix in molecular detail, especially in in vivo models17,18 and this prompts the development of more accessible natural-like in vitro models.
Bone resorption and polarisation of OC starts with the adhesion onto bone surface. The adhesion of OCs involves transmembrane molecules CD44 and αVβ3 integrin, which interact directly and indirectly with extracellular matrix and with intracellular, talin, vinculin and f-actin filaments19,20. These molecules are components of both podosomes (PD) and sealing zones (SZ)21,22,23. PDs are subcellular adhesion sites between OCs and ECM. The SZ refers to a functional subcellular structure that attaches the OCs to the bone surface and encircles the area being resorbed. SZ adhesion to bone has been characterised in a number of studies, but full mechanistic understanding of its function remains elusive24,25,26,27,28. The SZ has been claimed to develop from an actin patch (AP) on surface composed of apatite and collagen I3 and similar mechanism was suggested to take place on bone26. The ruffled border (RB) with folded membrane facing a resorption pit (RP) has been shown to the bone dissolving organelle14. Vacuolar proton pumps are shown to localise at the RB and it has been shown to undergo active vesicular traffic29,30,31. In many cases RBs are surrounded by a SZ, but it has been shown that RBs form and reduced level of resorption occurs in absence of fully functional SZs14 and that despite forming SZs some cells are unable to degrade the organic bone matrix and resorb bone15. Spatial organisation and dynamics of reorganisation of these structures have been studied in some detail32, these studies have revealed multiple relatively fast resorption bursts as compared to the classical more stationary sequence of events3. To develop a detailed understanding of the resorption process and forces folding the membrane and driving the vesicular transport an organotypic in vitro –model allowing high-resolution dynamic imaging needs to be established.
The current in vitro cell culture models either use artificial substrates; have rough surface that does not allow quantitation of resorption or thickness that does not allow use of super-resolution imaging. Our aim has been to empower research in bone biology with a cell culture model that would facilitate research on patient derived cells in a setting that would be three-dimensional, natural-like and accessible for modern imaging technologies. In the present study, we developed a method for bone powder coating of cell culture substrata and cantilevers of atomic force microscope (AFM). The experimental setup enables super-resolution imaging with stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscope, due to less dispersion from scattering, less autofluorescence and less impact from the mismatch of refractive indices; and biophysical adhesion force measurements of OCs binding to bone. In OCs cultured on the coating we were able to examine processes at the onset of resorption, visualise actin micro-domains directly above RPs and establish a vesicular transport mechanism utilising polymerisation of branched actin33.
Results
Smooth, elastic and translucent in vitro model of injured bone
To study bone-resorbing OCs in molecular detail, we produced a natural-like in vitro model of bone from milled nanoparticulate bone. The milling of cortical human bone and subsequent fractionation by sedimentation yielded a continuous size distribution of bone particles from 10–200 nm (Fig. 1a). The smoothest and most uniform coating over entire coverslip area was obtained with a coating buffer composed of 10 mM PO4, 0.025% (w/v) Triton X-100 and 0.05% (w/v) BSA (Fig. 1b1). Moreover, the BSA added to the buffer provided elasticity for the coating that enabled it to sustain bending of the AFM cantilever without breaking, while conducting force spectroscopy (FS) experiments. The bone-coated coverslips were imaged with LM, SEM and AFM to provide detailed characterisation of the created in vitro model of injured bone (Fig. 1). The x-z cross-sectional reflection image taken with confocal LM (Fig. 1c) shows a flat and smooth surface with an average thickness of the bone coating 7.5 ± 2 μm. In STED microscopy the coating facilitated micrograph resolution that was not possible on bone chip (Supplementary Fig. S1). The AFM image of the bone-coated coverslip (Fig. 1d) shows a flat surface with a peak-to-valley difference of 1.2 μm over an area of 50 × 50 μm. The SEM images of the bone-coated surface (Fig. 1e) also show a flat and smooth coating surface. The higher magnification (Fig. 1f) showed a fibril displaying typical electron dense bands of fibrillar collagen, indicative of the presence of proteins of the natural bone matrix and their successful reconstitution. On this coating the RPs were easily detected and we observed a wide range of RP depths (Fig. 2).
Osteoclasts present different morphology when grown on bone instead of glass
To study bone resorption by human OCs, we differentiated and cultured the CD34+ osteoclast precursor cells (Lonza) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells on glass coverslips, on coverslips coated with vitronectin, on coverslips coated with human bone particles and on human cortical bone slices (Fig. 2). We were able to differentiate mature OCs on all substrates from both, peripheral blood derived monocyte fraction with RANKL – M-CSF treatment34,35 and from bone marrow derived OCPs by using the provider’s protocol. Confocal reflection and backscatter signals, recorded at the excitation wavelength, as well as images from transmitted light detector were used to visualise changes in the bone coating, i.e. RPs. Nuclear labelling and phalloidin labelling for f-actin were used to visualise the morphology of OCs and the presence of OC-specific actin structures, i.e. PDs, actin ring SZs and APs, a feature typically seen over a RP (Figs 2 and 3). The bone-derived substrates on which OCs were grown on had a distinct effect on the morphology of OCs (Fig. 2). On bone-derived materials the average size of OCs was smaller and there were more resorption related actin structures, whereas on glass there were larger round OCs with more PD-structures (Fig. 2). Actin features and overall morphology of OCs were similar on bone slices and bone coating (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. S2). However, super-resolution imaging was not possible on sawed bone slice (Supplementary Fig. S1).
Actin structures in OCs on bone derived materials
On vitronectin coated coverslips and uncoated coverslips (Fig. 2a,b) the in OCs were large, rounded and exhibited mainly PD-structures in the shape of both rings and rafts. In contrast, in OCs grown on bone there were fewer PDs, while other structures SZs, APs and SARs were observed more frequently. Wide actin belts (width ≥ 2 μm, length and diameter 20–200 μm) were classified as SZs (Fig. 2d,g,j,m and Supplementary movies M1 and M2). The SZs could be found either at the edge of a RP or deeper inside of them organised in vertical orientation (Fig. 2d). When we examined the SZ in detail with STED microscopy, we observed a tightly packed lateral network of filaments (Fig. 3e,f). The organisation did not resemble the organisation of a PD-belt where star-shaped interlinked clusters were observed (Fig. 3n,o). Hence, formation of a SZ is likely to proceed through another mechanism than tighter clustering of PDs. Also we visualised actin networks termed APs of (diameter 5–50 μm) often directly above RPs (Fig. 2j, Supplementary Fig. S2B,E,H,K) and small (<5 μm in diameter) actin rings (SAR) (Fig. 2j, Supplementary Fig. S2H, K and video M2). Super-resolution imaging of the f-actin structure at AP revealed a network of interlinked filaments that were organised into convex pattern with some extending protrusions that closely align with the substrate (Fig. 3g–m). We visualised APs also at the bone interfaces where no clear RP or SZ was present (Fig. 2d, Supplementary Fig. S2C,E). This could suggest that the onset of resorption may not require a SZ to form prior to the formation of an AP-structure. Confocal images revealed an abundance of resorption pits on both bone slice and bone coating (Fig. 2c–l). The reflection light image from bone coating surface showed an otherwise smooth and uniform coating perforated with number of RPs (Fig. 2i,l, Supplementary Fig. S2 and Supplementary videos M1, M2 and M4), indicating active resorption. Some of these resorption sites consisted of a cluster of shallow small RPs, indicating dynamic resorption (Fig. 2). Consistent with previous EM studies15,14, we observed with DiI-staining that membranous structures are absent from the SZ and conversely we found overlap of membranous structures with f-actin at the AP (Supplementary Fig. S3 and M7).
OCs fuse to larger cells on glass
On both glass and vitronectin coated surfaces (Fig. 2a,b, Supplementary video M1), cells were rounded with multiple nuclei; on glass 1–20 nuclei per OC an average of 9.7 (N > 100) located in the middle of the cell (Fig. 4c,f). On bone-derived substrates, the number of nuclei was much lower; on bone coating only 1–4 nuclei per cell and on an average of 1.8 nuclei (N > 100) and many resorbing cells had only one nucleus (Fig. 4a,b,d,e,g). Furthermore, both on bone slices and bone coating, in the OCs associated with RPs, we typically found one nucleus tightly coupled within the actin structure close to the bone interface, indicating a more active role in the transcription required in the resorption process (Fig. 4 and Supplementary videos M1, M2 and M3).
Morphology of resorbing osteoclasts
On the bone particle coating there were typically clusters of RPs and the pits were accompanied with SZs, APs, or SARs each with characteristic pattern of f-actin and protein localisation and membranous compartments (Figs 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and Supplementary Figs S2, S3 and S5). More detailed studies of RPs on bone particle coating and bone slices revealed an uneven resorption pattern with smaller deep protrusions inside a larger RP (Figs 2d,e and 3d, Supplementary Fig. S2E,G,H, arrow in S2M and Supplementary videos M1–M4), all suggesting a sequence of rest and rearrangement periods between resorption bursts. However, once an OC is induced to resorb bone it continues with the task, although site of resorption may change and the cell may migrate3. Resorption was confirmed by measuring concentration of the c-terminal degradation fragments of type I collagen (CTX-values) (Supplementary Fig. S4). The higher CTX-value on bone slices is most likely because of more bone being available for resorption.
At AP-structures we did not observe stabile filamentous actin bundles that would instinctively be taken to facilitate protracted transport of proteins and vesicles to resorption site and away into the cytoplasm and further to the secretory domain36. On the bone coating, V-ATPase staining was found to localise at the plasma membrane on the site of AP, in a number of large vacuoles with strong staining for V-ATPase and small puncta of acidified lysosomes and endosomal structures (Fig. 5)31. However, the vacuoles were also seen above PD- and SZ-structures (Fig. 5). This suggests that SZ-structure does not necessarily depolymerise during the accumulation of acidified vesicles and possibly serves as a template to generate the RB needed for the next round of resorption. The vacuoles were surrounded by an actin capsule, again suggesting that they interact with actin network and may be transported by polymerising actin to the site of resorption. Inside RPs, the AP actin structures co-localised with intense dynamin (Fig. 6) and Arp 2/3 staining (Supplementary Fig. S5), suggesting sequestration of dynamin to these sites, intense actin dynamics and active exocytosis37,38 and endocytosis23,39. Taken together, these observations in human OCs indicate a dynamic process of resorption cycles where bursts of resorption are followed by accumulation of acidic compartments to be utilised in the next cycle of resorption and forming and dissociation of actin structures related to the process (Figs 6 and 7, Supplementary Fig. S5 and Supplementary videos M1–M6).
Adhesion energy measurements
As another application of the in vitro model, OC adhesion energies were measured in FS experiments using tipless AFM cantilevers coated with bone particles. SEM images of BSA (Fig. 7a) and bone particle coated cantilevers (Fig. 7b) show that the whole cantilever is coated with bone. FS experiments with the functionalised cantilevers were conducted in the CellHesion system (JPK) (Fig. 7c). First, spring constants of the functionalised cantilevers were measured and then OC adhesion maximum forces (highest adhesion force) and energies (area under the curve) were measured. Adhesion was stronger towards bone surface than to the control BSA coating. The representative adhesion FDCs at a 300 s time point are shown in Fig. 7d,e. The maximum adhesion force with bone-coated cantilever was around 100 nN and around 30 nN with BSA coating. The difference in adhesion energy was even greater between the coatings in favour of bone-coated surface (Fig. 7f). The difference between adhesion energies was found to be significant (P-value 0.0043, N = 5 for BSA coating and N = 6 for bone coating) at 300 s time point. The results show that the binding to bone surface was strong and specific and that the difference to BSA-coating became larger over the contact time suggesting specific biological activity, i.e. cell-ECM – signalling (Fig. 7f).
Discussion
We have developed a bone particle coating method, which mimics injured human bone and serves as an in vitro culture substrate and an AFM probe coating material that exhibits natural biological and physicochemical microenvironment for OCs. The bone particle coating was a uniform, microscopically thin and smooth layer of bone particles that could be deposited on any surface. This layer was considerably thinner than a bone slice and facilitated super-resolution light microscopy on resorbing OCs and easy detection of RPs. The coating was shown to be a biologically relevant mixture of inorganic and organic bone matrix including, at least, collagen fibrils. Hence, even after elaborate processing and coating, RPs, high CTX-value and innate structures of original bone e.g. filamentous collagen with D-bands were observed. Thus, the coating closely mimics natural environment for bone resorption3. The elasticity of the coating allowed us to coat AFM probes and expand FS experiments on OCs beyond probing interaction of single molecules40,41. We were able to compare adhesion energies in a simple, straightforward and precise manner (Fig. 7). On the bone coating we were able to utilise STED microscopy to study the actin cytoskeleton (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Fig. S1) and localise immunofluorescence signals in respect to bone with high precision in bone resorbing OCs by confocal microscopy (Figs 5 and 6 and Supplementary Fig. S5). This was made possible by the decrease of bone autofluorescence, ease of sample preparation, better optical access to the RPs and horizontal orientation of the cells and the resorption machinery in the coated samples. The even surface of the bone coating facilitated label-free identification of RP and makes calculation of the number of RPs and their volume straightforward. We observed shallow RPs indicating early stages of resorption and observed RP clusters supporting a theory of resorption being a dynamic process. Furthermore, it was confirmed that the cells were indeed OCs15 and could resorb bone and degrade of the organic bone matrix by CTX analysis. The CTX content of the media of both bone marrow derived OCs (Lonza) as well as peripheral blood-derived osteoclasts cultured on bone coating and bone slices were measured (Supplementary Fig. S4).
We and others4,12,42,43 have found distinct differences in OCs grown on glass and on bone-derived substrates. While OC activity has been shown on a number of substrates8, there is a striking difference in morphology between OCs grown on glass and bone substrates as well as in the size of the OCs and amount of nuclei per OC. On glass the OCs had very distinct morphology with a roundish, cup-like appearance with an average of 9.7 nuclei located in the middle of the cell. On bone substrates, the OCs had more irregular shape, the size of the OCs was smaller, they had only an average of 1.8 nuclei and some resorbing cells had only one nucleus (Fig. 4). The bone coating may be an easier substrate to resorb and thus facilitate resoption by mononuclear cells. Although, observation of small RPs is easy on the bone coating, it would be more difficult on a bone slice. This significant difference and previous observations with osteoclast specific TRAcP staining4,44 on mononuclear cells indicate that fusion of OC precursors would not be an essential step in formation of resorbing mature human OCs. It would appear that without stimulus to commence resorption, osteoclasts on artificial substrates tend to fuse to form larger cells with more nuclei (Fig. 4a). While majority of observations in literature match the classical OC definition (TRAcP positive and 3 or more nuclei), it would appear that on bone coating there are bone resorbing cells that do not have more than three nuclei and there are multinuclear TRAcP positive foreign body giant cells that are not able to resorb bone15. In the resorbing OCs that had several nuclei, typically one, slightly larger nucleus was found very close to the site of resorption (Fig. 4a,b). Conversely on glass the nuclei were located further away from the cell-glass interface, implying a lower level of activity.
On bone we were able to visualise cells exhibiting a dynamic mixture of actin structures i.e. PD, SAR, SZ and AP (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. S2), matching previous findings3,19,32,45. The PD-structures were clearly visible on glass and vitronectin-coated glass and also on bone, although their abundance was reduced. This finding may indicate that upon coming to contact with the physicochemical substrate suitable for resorption the mechanosensing function of PDs is fulfilled46,47 or that on bone OC prefers different adhesion mechanism as a result of biological recognition26. The SZ was apparent only in some of the cells cultured on bone, both bone coating and slices, while APs and SARs were more common. We have visualised V-ATPase (Fig. 5)48, Arp2/3 (Supplementary Fig. S5)25,49, dynamin (Fig. 6)23,50 and membranous structures15 at RP at AP-structures to indicate active on-going resorption (Supplementary Figs S3–S4). In addition to this, we observed a medium intensity of V-ATPase in the middle of a SZ (Fig. 5). Further away from the bone interface, we observed vacuoles filled with V-ATPase. In OCs grown on glass, we observed only staining of vacuoles and lysosomes and endosomal structures, but no accumulation at the glass interface. Our data supports past studies showing that V-ATPase generates the low pH needed to dissolve bone31,48, but also suggest that pre-acidified vacuoles could be transported to APs at resorption sites during active resorption.
Dynamin staining was spread throughout the plasma membrane, however, an intense staining at AP-structures was observed (Fig. 6). Previously it has been shown that dynamin blocker dynasore inhibits resorption50 and that RBs are the bone resorbing organelles14,15; we observed the strongest association between actin and dynamin at the AP-sites and RPs aligned consistently with APs and SARs, therefore we presume APs signify RBs. Moreover, an overlay image of dynamin and f-actin shows dynamin localising at the puncta in actin network (Fig. 6). This data suggest that there is active vesicular transport at the AP and less at the other actin structures. The Arp2/3 localisation in filaments at APs (Supplementary Fig. S5) may indicate that branched actin could be involved in generating the forces to form protrusions and drive endocytic and exocytic vesicle transport to deliver acidic vacuoles to RB and to remove resorption products from RB.
At the RB, prior EM data has shown multiple deep invaginations that have been associated with endocytosis of resorbed material and exocytosis of ions and proteases45,30. Staining the OC membranes we observed membrane protrusions aligning with f-actin at AP along with other membranous structures, again indicating that the AP indeed is the RB and on SZ we found only plasma membrane and a wide band of membrane free cytoplasm (Supplementary Fig. S3), an observation consistent with previous reports15. In most cases there was no SZ associated with observed RPs or APs, however, with lager RPs, a SZ was typically observed (Fig. 2). The lack of SZ associated with APs and RPs (Figs 2 and 5 and Supplementary Fig. S2) indicates unconnected formation or fast and possibly independent dynamics of SZ and RB structures3. Moreover, an OC grown on bone coating and exhibiting a SZ does not consistently show accumulation of dynamin at the SZ or at its centre (Fig. 6). Hence, SZ and RB appear to be separate structures with different biological roles and at least existence of SZ does not necessitate existence of RB15. Further experiments are needed to establish the mechanisms through which the membrane dynamics are regulated at resorption sites and how does the transport relate to actin micro-domains.
We measured adhesion energy of OCs to bone and BSA coated probes at three different time points: 30 s that permits interaction of receptors already expressed on OC surface, 120 s that permits adhesion-related signalling to progress further and vesicular transport to take place and 300 s that allows signalling that is likely to reach nuclear receptors and over the course of the experiment, 15 FDCs (75 min), for transcription to take place51. The OCs had higher average adhesion energy when adhering to bone coating than to BSA coating with each contact time. The most significant difference was measured when the cells were allowed to adhere to the probe for 300 s (Fig. 7). According to expectations, we measured also an increase of adhesion to BSA coating as the contact time increased, but the slope of this increase was less than the increase of adhesion observed to bone coating. This adaptive adhesion suggests a process of bone recognition and signalling, followed by transcription, translation and translocation of the proteins, all specific to OC-bone contact52,53.
We have shown that actin structure above RPs did not have stabile vertical actin bundles but a local network of lateral fibrils. These fibrils could mediate binding to the calcified substrate to be resorbed, create protrusions and exert the forces required to drive vesicular transport (Fig. 3)54,55,56. The presence of bright dynamin signal at the nodes of the actin network and string-like Arp2/3 staining suggest that these forces are likely to be exerted by branched actin polymerisation (Fig. 6 and Supplementary Fig. S5)33,38,57. This conclusion is further corroborated by visualisation of high abundance and string-like morphology of Arp2/3 complexes at RB, whereas in PDs and SZs the filament length of Arp2/3 was shorter (Supplementary Fig. S5). The presence of Arp2/3 staining has been linked with dynamic actin polymerisation and vesicular transport and in the case of OCs it could serve a role in both exocytosis of acidified vacuoles and endocytosis of resorbed material. We propose that resorption is carried out in temporally controlled cycles where acidified vacuoles are accumulated within the OC, vacuoles are delivered to RB to generate acidic microenvironment and resorption products are removed from the RP by endocytosis (Fig. 8). Forces to drive this cycle are generated by dynamic actin polymerisation and possibly by myosin 10 mediated transport along actin26.
The species-specific bone coating facilitates super-resolution LM throughout the coating with STED microscope and adhesion measurements with AFM on live osteoclasts, all in a relevant biological context. The higher detail of LM was achieved due to the microscale thickness of the novel coating that reduced scattering and autofluorescence. The more detailed imaging at bone interface facilitated insights to the resorption process and supports dynamic actin reorganisation and that RB visualised, as AP is the necessary organelle to resorb bone. The application of the coating for FS is made possible by its elasticity and ability to form a dense coverage, even on small surfaces. Our study puts forth a temporally controlled mechanism where resorption progresses in a series of cycles maintaining the acidic microenvironment for relatively brief periods at a time through release of acidified vacuoles (Fig. 8).
Methods
Osteoclast cultures
Two types of OC cultures were utilised: OC cultures were established from human peripheral blood and from human bone marrow-derived CD34+ stem cells (Lonza, Walkersville, USA). Blood-derived human OC cultures (N = 33) from peripheral blood of healthy volunteers (N = 3) were performed as previously described34,35. The study was approved by Ethics Committee of Southwest Finland Hospital District and the participants gave their informed written consents to osteoclast cultures. The study was carried out in accordance with the guidelines set for research on human tissue by Turku University Hospital and University of Turku. First monocyte fraction was isolated with Ficoll gradient centrifugation according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Then the monocytes were seeded to coverslips and differentiated to multinuclear OCs in the presence of medium containing alphaMEM (GIBGO, Grand Island, NY, 41061-029), 10% iFBS (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY, 16000-044), 10 mM HEPES (Sigma-Aldrich, H0887), 1:100 penicillin-streptomycin, RANKL (20 ng/ml, Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ, 310-01) and M-CSF (10 ng/ml, R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN) for 8–10 days. Half of the medium was changed to fresh one after 3–4 days in order to preserve auto- and paracrine signalling molecules.
Human bone marrow-derived CD34+ stem cells were cultured according to provider’s protocol58. The CD34+ stem cells were suspended in culture medium and allowed to attach to glass, bone slice, or functionalised glass surfaces. The culture medium (containing 10% FBS, OCP BulletKit® Lonza,) was supplemented with 33 ng/ml M-CSF and 66 ng/ml RANK-ligand (Lonza). After the osteoclast differentiation period on day 7, all culture medium was removed and fresh medium was added into the wells. The mature osteoclasts were cultured for an additional 3 days, during which they were allowed to resorb bone. This medium was then analysed for C-terminal cross-linking telopeptides of type I collagen (CTX) (Supplementary Methods). All cells were on the respective substrata throughout the whole culture period.
Bone powder for cell culture substratum
Use of expired, banked human bone was approved by Northern Ostrobothnia Hospital District Ethical committee (statement 16/2009) and Valvira, National Supervisory Authority for Welfare and Health (Dnro 220/05.01.00.06/2009). The procedure to extract the tissue was conducted in accordance with guidelines approved by Northern Ostrobothnia Hospital District Ethical committee. Donors had given their informed written consent to use the material in academic research. Cortical human bone from three different donors was mechanically pre-ground to produce millimetre scale powder. The pre-processed bone was further milled in ethanol suspension with a planetary ball mill (Fritsch Pulverisette 6, Idar-Oberstein, Germany) to reach a particle size of 10–1000 nm, in order to produce a smooth and thin coating. Sedimentation in ethanol was used to isolate a 10–200 nm-sized fraction of particles for coating. The milling balls used were 2 mm diameter ZrO2 particles from Retch (Haan, Germany). After milling the bone particle suspension was allowed settle for 15 min and the soluble fraction was removed. This fraction was further allowed to sediment for 2 h. After second sedimentation step the soluble fraction was taken out and allowed to sediment for 16 h. The third fraction of particles remaining in suspension was then removed and used for coating the selected surfaces.
Coating of coverslips
Cleaned coverslips were coated with poly-l-lysine by incubating in 0.01% poly-l-lysine solution (Sigma-Aldrich Corporation, St. Louis, USA, P1524) overnight. Then, coverslips were coated with bone particles in buffer with 10 mM PO4, 0.025% (w/v) Triton X-100 and 0.05% (w/v) BSA. Prior to coating the bone particles were removed from ethanol we used as the milling suspension and re-suspended to coating solutions. We tested different coating solution compositions, e.g. 1) 10 mM PO4, 0.05% BSA and 0.025% Triton X-100, 2) ethanol, 3) ion exchanged water, 4) 10 mM PO4 and 0.1% milk, 5) 10 mM PO4, 0.1% milk and 0.1% Triton X-100 and 6) 10 mM PO4 and 150 mM NaCl. After the coating suspension had dried the coverslips were carefully washed in water for 30 minutes and then dried completely. Finally the bone coating was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 20 minutes and stored at 4 °C. The vitronectin coating was prepared using the same protocol with a solution of 1 μg/ml vitronectin in water. All incubations were carried out at room temperature.
Coating of AFM cantilevers
For adhesion energy measurement, tipless AFM cantilevers (CSC12/tipless/no Al, MikroMasch®, Innovative Solutions Bulgaria Ltd., Sofia, Bulgaria) were coated with bone particles. Prior to the bone particle coating, cantilevers were treated with APTES ((3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane)/ethanolamine vapour59. The APTES coated cantilevers were subsequently coated with bone particles in the aforementioned bone solution. The cantilevers were incubated in the bone solution overnight, fixed with 4% PFA for 20 minutes, washed gently in PBS for 30 minutes and stored in PBS at 4 °C.
Cell adhesion measurement
OC adhesion force to coated AFM cantilever was measured with JPK AFM equipped with a CellHesion module (JPK Instruments) on a Zeiss LSM510 microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy). During the measurements, cells were kept at 37 °C with a BioCell module (JPK). Prior to the force measurements, AFM cantilevers were calibrated with measured deflection sensitivity and spring constant by the instrument calibration program. For the force measurements, OCs with 4–6 nuclei were selected with fluorescence microscopy by staining the nuclei with Hoechst 33342. Excitation was with a mercury lamp and fluorescence was detected with CCD camera. After a functionally coated cantilever was placed on the selected cell, instrument was run at force spectroscopy mode with relative deflection of 2 V and z-range of 70–100 um, depending on vertical dimension of the OCs. Adhesion force curves were recorded at three different extraction delay time, 30, 120 and 300 seconds to give different time periods for cellular responses. The measurements with each contact time were repeated at least 10 times on each cell with a single cantilever and then a mean adhesion was calculated. The data represents averaged adhesion energies of OC derived from the blood of 5 healthy volunteers. The experiment was conducted with bone particle coated and BSA coated cantilevers. Measured force curves were analysed to calculate adhesion energy by JPK Data Processing software (JPK Instruments) and the statistical analysis was performed with Mann-Whitney test available in R (version 3.0.3, GNU Software).
Confocal and STED fluorescence microscopy and labelling of the OCs
More details on labelling and imaging are provided in supplementary methods and here we briefly summarise the experimental procedures. Cells were labelled with 2.5 μg/ml anti-dynamin mouse antibody, 10 μg/ml anti-arp2 rabbit antibody or 2 μg/ml anti-V-ATPase rabbit polyclonal antibody recognising all isoforms for 1 h in PBS containing 0.5% BSA. The secondary labeling was conducted for 1 h with anti-mouse or anti-rabbit alexa488 in PBS containing 0.5% BSA, along with 200 ng/ml phalloidin-Star635 and 10 ng/ml PicoGreen. To stain membranes we used 5 μg/ml of lipophilic DiI. The cells were then washed and embedded in mowiol. All images were acquired with a Leica SP5 STED microscope, equipped with pulsed Ti: Sapphire depletion laser MaiTai HP and 635 nm pulsed laser and an avalanche photo diode (APD) detector at 665–705 nm range. STED microscopy images were processed using DeconvolutionLab plugin60 (Richardson-Lucy with TV regularisation algorithm, regularisation parameter 0.005 and 20 iterations, for panel 3O only 4 iterations were used) for ImageJ with experimentally measured PSF.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Deguchi, T. et al. In vitro model of bone to facilitate measurement of adhesion forces and super-resolution imaging of osteoclasts. Sci. Rep. 6, 22585; doi: 10.1038/srep22585 (2016).
References
Boskey, A. L. & Coleman, R. Aging and Bone. J Dent Res 89, 1333–1348 (2010).
Eriksen, E. F. Cellular mechanisms of bone remodeling. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 11, 219–227 (2010).
Saltel, F., Destaing, O., Bard, F., Eichert, D. & Jurdic, P. Apatite-mediated Actin Dynamics in Resorbing Osteoclasts. Mol Biol Cell 15, 5231–5241 (2004).
Kleinhans, C., Schmid, F. F., Schmid, F. V. & Kluger, P. J. Comparison of osteoclastogenesis and resorption activity of human osteoclasts on tissue culture polystyrene and on natural extracellular bone matrix in 2D and 3D. Journal of Biotechnology 205, 101–110 (2015).
Geblinger, D., Addadi, L. & Geiger, B. Nano-topography sensing by osteoclasts. J. Cell. Sci. 123, 1503–1510 (2010).
Griffith, L. G. & Swartz, M. A. Capturing complex 3D tissue physiology in vitro. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7, 211–224 (2006).
Nakamura, I. et al. Role of alpha(v)beta(3) integrin in osteoclast migration and formation of the sealing zone. J. Cell. Sci. 112 (Pt 22), 3985–3993 (1999).
Fuller, K., Ross, J. L., Szewczyk, K. A., Moss, R. & Chambers, T. J. Bone is not essential for osteoclast activation. PLoS ONE 5, (2010).
Matsunaga, T. et al. Disaggregated osteoclasts increase in resorption activity in response to roughness of bone surface. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 48, 417–423 (1999).
Gomi, K., Lowenberg, B., Shapiro, G. & Davies, J. E. Resorption of sintered synthetic hydroxyapatite by osteoclasts in vitro. Biomaterials 14, 91–96 (1993).
Nakamura, M., Hentunen, T., Salonen, J., Nagai, A. & Yamashita, K. Characterization of bone mineral-resembling biomaterials for optimizing human osteoclast differentiation and resorption. J. Biomed. Mater. Res 101, 3141–3151 (2013).
Geblinger, D., Geiger, B. & Addadi, L. Surface-induced regulation of podosome organization and dynamics in cultured osteoclasts. Chembiochem 10, 158–165 (2009).
Chambers, T. J. & Fuller, K. How are osteoclasts induced to resorb bone? Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1240, 1–6 (2011).
Cremasco, V. et al. Protein kinase C-delta deficiency perturbs bone homeostasis by selective uncoupling of cathepsin K secretion and ruffled border formation in osteoclasts. J. Bone Miner. Res. 27, 2452–2463 (2012).
ten Harkel, B. et al. The Foreign Body Giant Cell Cannot Resorb Bone, But Dissolves Hydroxyapatite Like Osteoclasts. PLoS ONE 10, e0139564 (2015).
Papadimitropoulos, A. et al. A 3D in vitro bone organ model using human progenitor cells. Eur Cell Mater 21, 445–458; discussion 458 (2011).
Kanehisa, J. et al. A band of F-actin containing podosomes is involved in bone resorption by osteoclasts. Bone 11, 287–293 (1990).
Luxenburg, C. et al. The architecture of the adhesive apparatus of cultured osteoclasts: from podosome formation to sealing zone assembly. PLoS ONE 2, e179 (2007).
Destaing, O., Saltel, F., Géminard, J.-C., Jurdic, P. & Bard, F. Podosomes display actin turnover and dynamic self-organization in osteoclasts expressing actin-green fluorescent protein. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 407–416 (2003).
Fukunaga, T., Zou, W., Warren, J. T. & Teitelbaum, S. L. Vinculin Regulates Osteoclast Function. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 13554–13564 (2014).
Lakkakorpi, P. T. & Väänänen, H. K. Kinetics of the osteoclast cytoskeleton during the resorption cycle in vitro. J. Bone Miner. Res. 6, 817–826 (1991).
Jurdic, P., Saltel, F., Chabadel, A. & Destaing, O. Podosome and sealing zone: Specificity of the osteoclast model. European Journal of Cell Biology 85, 195–202 (2006).
Bruzzaniti, A. et al. Dynamin Forms a Src Kinase–sensitive Complex with Cbl and Regulates Podosomes and Osteoclast Activity. Mol Biol Cell 16, 3301–3313 (2005).
Anderegg, F. et al. Substrate adhesion regulates sealing zone architecture and dynamics in cultured osteoclasts. PLoS ONE 6, e28583 (2011).
Hurst, I. R., Zuo, J., Jiang, J. & Holliday, L. S. Actin-Related Protein 2/3 Complex Is Required for Actin Ring Formation. J Bone Miner Res 19, 499–506 (2004).
McMichael, B. K., Cheney, R. E. & Lee, B. S. Myosin X Regulates Sealing Zone Patterning in Osteoclasts through Linkage of Podosomes and Microtubules. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 9506–9515 (2010).
Zou, W. et al. Talin1 and Rap1 are critical for osteoclast function. Mol. Cell. Biol. 33, 830–844 (2013).
Zou, W. & Teitelbaum, S. L. Absence of Dap12 and the αvβ3 integrin causes severe osteopetrosis. J Cell Biol 208, 125–136 (2015).
Blair, H. C., Teitelbaum, S. L., Ghiselli, R. & Gluck, S. Osteoclastic bone resorption by a polarized vacuolar proton pump. Science 245, 855–857 (1989).
Akisaka, T. & Yoshida, A. Visualization of structural organization of ventral membranes of sheared-open resorbing osteoclasts attached to apatite pellets. Cell Tissue Res. 360, 347–362 (2015).
Nyman, J. K. E. & Väänänen, H. K. A rationale for osteoclast selectivity of inhibiting the lysosomal V-ATPase a3 isoform. Calcif. Tissue Int. 87, 273–283 (2010).
Saltel, F., Chabadel, A., Bonnelye, E. & Jurdic, P. Actin cytoskeletal organisation in osteoclasts: a model to decipher transmigration and matrix degradation. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 87, 459–468 (2008).
Collins, A., Warrington, A., Taylor, K. & Svitkina, T. Structural Organization of the Actin Cytoskeleton at Sites of Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis. Current Biology 21, 1167–1175 (2011).
Yang, F.-C. et al. Hyperactivation of p21ras and PI3K cooperate to alter murine and human neurofibromatosis type 1–haploinsufficient osteoclast functions. Journal of Clinical Investigation 116, 2880–2891 (2006).
Heervä, E. et al. Osteoclasts in neurofibromatosis type 1 display enhanced resorption capacity, aberrant morphology and resistance to serum deprivation. Bone 47, 583–590 (2010).
Salo, J., Lehenkari, P., Mulari, M., Metsikkö, K. & Väänänen, H. K. Removal of Osteoclast Bone Resorption Products by Transcytosis. Science 276, 270–273 (1997).
Anantharam, A. et al. A new role for the dynamin GTPase in the regulation of fusion pore expansion. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 1907–1918 (2011).
Chiang, H.-C. et al. Post-fusion structural changes and their roles in exocytosis and endocytosis of dense-core vesicles. Nat Commun 5, (2014).
Sever, S., Chang, J. & Gu, C. Dynamin Rings: Not Just for Fission. Traffic 14, 1194–1199 (2013).
Lehenkari, P. P. & Horton, M. A. Single Integrin Molecule Adhesion Forces in Intact Cells Measured by Atomic Force Microscopy. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 259, 645–650 (1999).
Horton, M., Charras, G. & Lehenkari, P. Analysis of ligand-receptor interactions in cells by atomic force microscopy. J. Recept. Signal Transduct. Res. 22, 169–190 (2002).
Taylor, J. C., Cuff, S. E., Leger, J. P. L., Morra, A. & Anderson, G. I. In vitro osteoclast resorption of bone substitute biomaterials used for implant site augmentation: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17, 321–330 (2002).
Badran, Z. et al. Assay of in vitro osteoclast activity on dentine and synthetic calcium phosphate bone substitutes. J Mater Sci Mater Med 23, 797–803 (2012).
Andersson, G. N. & Marks, S. C. Tartrate-resistant acid ATPase as a cytochemical marker for osteoclasts. J Histochem Cytochem 37, 115–117 (1989).
Mulari, M. T. K., Zhao, H., Lakkakorpi, P. T. & Väänänen, H. K. Osteoclast Ruffled Border Has Distinct Subdomains for Secretion and Degraded Matrix Uptake. Traffic 4, 113–125 (2003).
Dries, K. van den et al. Dual-color superresolution microscopy reveals nanoscale organization of mechanosensory podosomes. Mol. Biol. Cell 24, 2112–2123 (2013).
van den Dries, K., Bolomini-Vittori, M. & Cambi, A. Spatiotemporal organization and mechanosensory function of podosomes. Cell Adh Migr 8, 268–272 (2014).
Qin, A. et al. V-ATPases in osteoclasts: Structure, function and potential inhibitors of bone resorption. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology 44, 1422–1435 (2012).
Szewczyk, K. A., Fuller, K. & Chambers, T. J. Distinctive subdomains in the resorbing surface of osteoclasts. PLoS ONE 8, e60285 (2013).
Thirukonda, G. J. et al. The dynamin inhibitor dynasore inhibits bone resorption by rapidly disrupting actin rings of osteoclasts. J. Bone Miner. Metab. (2015). doi: 10.1007/s00774-015-0683-1
Mulari, M., Vääräniemi, J. & Väänänen, H. K. Intracellular membrane trafficking in bone resorbing osteoclasts. Microsc. Res. Tech. 61, 496–503 (2003).
Väänänen, H. K., Zhao, H., Mulari, M. & Halleen, J. M. The cell biology of osteoclast function. J. Cell. Sci. 113 (Pt 3), 377–381 (2000).
Väänänen, K. Mechanism of osteoclast mediated bone resorption--rationale for the design of new therapeutics. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 57, 959–971 (2005).
Liu, J., Sun, Y., Drubin, D. G. & Oster, G. F. The mechanochemistry of endocytosis. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000204 (2009).
Carlsson, A. E. & Bayly, P. V. Force generation by endocytic actin patches in budding yeast. Biophys. J. 106, 1596–1606 (2014).
Messa, M. et al. Epsin deficiency impairs endocytosis by stalling the actin-dependent invagination of endocytic clathrin-coated pits. Elife 3, e03311 (2014).
Svitkina, T. M. Ultrastructure of protrusive actin filament arrays. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 25, 574–581 (2013).
Pederson, L., Ruan, M., Westendorf, J. J., Khosla, S. & Oursler, M. J. Regulation of bone formation by osteoclasts involves Wnt/BMP signaling and the chemokine sphingosine-1-phosphate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105, 20764–20769 (2008).
Ebner, A., Hinterdorfer, P. & Gruber, H. J. Comparison of different aminofunctionalization strategies for attachment of single antibodies to AFM cantilevers. Ultramicroscopy 107, 922–927 (2007).
Vonesch, C., Member, S. & Unser, M. A fast thresholded Landweber algorithm for waveletregularized multidimensional deconvolution. IEEE Trans. Image Process 539549 (2008).
Acknowledgements
Imaging and force spectroscopy was performed at the Cell Imaging Core, Turku Centre for Biotechnology, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University. We thank Linus Silvander from Åbo Akademi Process Chemistry Centre for SEM imaging and Miso Immonen for technical assistance with OC cultures. We gratefully acknowledge funding from Academy of Finland from grant #110174 (TN) and Turku Doctoral Programme of Molecular Medicine (TN and TD), National Doctoral Programme in Informational and Structural Biology (TN) and iBioMEP (T.D.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.N., J.P. and T.D. conceived the study. M.A., P.P. and J.P. devised protocols for O.C. cultures. M.A. & P.P. cultured OCs. T.N., T.D. and E.F. developed the bone coating. T.N., T.D. and P.H. developed the protocols for confocal and STED microscopy. T.D., T.N. and E.F. conducted imaging and force spectroscopy measurements. T.D. & T.N. conducted data analysis. K.F. did CTX measurements and provided bone marrow derived OCs. PL provided starting material for bone coating and bone slices. T.N. wrote the paper with significant contribution from J.P. & T.D.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Deguchi, T., Alanne, M., Fazeli, E. et al. In vitro model of bone to facilitate measurement of adhesion forces and super-resolution imaging of osteoclasts. Sci Rep 6, 22585 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22585
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22585
This article is cited by
-
Cell Sources for Human In vitro Bone Models
Current Osteoporosis Reports (2021)
-
A Novel Sandwich ELISA for Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase 5a and 5b Protein Reveals that Both Isoforms are Secreted by Differentiating Osteoclasts and Correlate to the Type I Collagen Degradation Marker CTX-I In Vivo and In Vitro
Calcified Tissue International (2020)
-
Diversity of actin architecture in human osteoclasts: network of curved and branched actin supporting cell shape and intercellular micrometer-level tubes
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry (2017)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.