Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
To evaluate the effect of home-based neonatal care on birth asphyxia and to compare the effectiveness of two types of workers and three methods of resuscitation in home delivery.
STUDY DESIGN:
In a field trial of home-based neonatal care in rural Gadchiroli, India, birth asphyxia in home deliveries was managed differently during different phases. Trained traditional birth attendants (TBA) used mouth-to-mouth resuscitation in the baseline years (1993 to 1995). Additional village health workers (VHWs) only observed in 1995 to 1996. In the intervention years (1996 to 2003), they used tube-mask (1996 to 1999) and bag-mask (1999 to 2003). The incidence, case fatality (CF) and asphyxia-specific mortality rate (ASMR) during different phases were compared.
RESULTS:
During the intervention years, 5033 home deliveries occurred. VHWs were present during 84% home deliveries. The incidence of mild birth asphyxia decreased by 60%, from 14% in the observation year (1995 to 1996) to 6% in the intervention years (p<0.0001). The incidence of severe asphyxia did not change significantly, but the CF in neonates with severe asphyxia decreased by 47.5%, from 39 to 20% (p<0.07) and ASMR by 65%, from 11 to 4% (p<0.02). Mouth-to-mouth resuscitation reduced the ASMR by 12%, tube–mask further reduced the CF by 27% and the ASMR by 67%. The bag–mask showed an additional decrease in CF of 39% and in the fresh stillbirth rate of 33% in comparison to tube–mask (not significant). The cost of bag and mask was $13 per averted death. Oxytocic injection administered by unqualified doctors showed an odds ratio of three for the occurrence of severe asphyxia or fresh stillbirth.
CONCLUSIONS:
Home-based interventions delivered by a team of TBA and a semiskilled VHW reduced the asphyxia-related neonatal mortality by 65% compared to only TBA. The bag–mask appears to be superior to tube–mask or mouth-to-mouth resuscitation, with an estimated equipment cost of $13 per death averted.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
World Health Organization. The World Health Report, 1998: Life in 21st Century — A Vision for All. WHO: Geneva; 1998.
State of the World's Newborns. Save the Children. Washington, DC; 2001.
Wiggleworth JS . Monitoring perinatal mortality: a patho-physiological approach. Lancet 1980;2:684–686.
Keeling JW, MacGillivry I, Golding J, Wiggleworth JS, Berry J, Dunn PM . Classification of perinatal death. Arch Dis Child 1989;64:1345–1351.
Ellis M, Dharma M . Progress in Perinatal Asphyxia. Semin Neonatol 1999;4:183–191.
Singh M, Paul VK, Bhakoo ON . Neonatal Nomenclature and Data Collection. New Delhi: National Neonatology Forum; 1989. p. 63–74.
Singh M . Diagnosis and management of perinatal asphyxia. Indian Pediatr 1994;31:1169–1174.
Kumar R . Birth asphyxia in a rural community in North India. J Trop Pediatr 1995;41:5–7.
Indian Council of Medical Research. A national collaborative study of identification of high risk families, mothers and outcome of their offsprings with particular reference to the problem of maternal nutrition, low birth weight, perinatal and infant morbidity and mortality in rural and urban slum communities. An ICMR Task Force Study. New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research; 1990.
Bang AT, Bang RA, Baitule S, Deshmukh M, Reddy MH . Burden of morbidities and the unmet need for health care in rural neonates — a prospective observational study in Gadchiroli, India. Indian Pediatr 2001;38:952–965.
Bang AT, Reddy HM, Baitule SB, et al. Incidence of morbidities in a cohort of neonates in rural Gadchiroli, India: Seasonal & temporal variation & a hypothesis about prevention. J Perinatol 2005;25:S18–S28.
Bang AT, Paul VK, Reddy HM, et al. Why do neonates die in rural Gadchiroli, India? (Part I). Primary causes of death assigned by neonatologist based on prospectively observed records. J Perinatol 2005;25:S29–S34.
Bang AT, Reddy HM, Bang RA, Deshmukh M . Why do neonates die in rural Gadchiroli, India? (Part II). Estimating population attributable risks and contribution of multiple morbidities for identifying a strategy to prevent deaths. J Perinatol 2005;25:S35–43.
Bang AT, Bang RA, Baitule S, Reddy MH, Deshmukh M . Effect of home-based neonatal care and management of sepsis on neonatal mortality: field trial in rural India. Lancet 1999;354:1955–1961.
Bang AT, Bang RA . Background of the field trial of home-based neonatal care in Gadchiroli, India. J Perinatol 2005;25:S3–10.
Bang AT, Bang RA, Reddy HM, et al. Methods and the baseline situation in the field trial of home-based neonatal care in Gadchiroli, India. J Perinatol 2005;25:S11–S17.
Bang AT, Bang RA, Tale O, et al. Reduction in pneumonia mortality and total childhood mortality by means of community-based intervention trial in Gadchiroli, India. Lancet 1990;336:201–206.
Bang AT, Bang RA and the SEARCH team. Diagnosis of causes of childhood deaths in developing countries by verbal autopsy: suggested criteria. Bull World Health Organ 1992;70(4):499–507.
Bang RA, Bang AT and SEARCH Team. Commentary on a community based approach to reproductive health care. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1989;3:125–129.
Ellis Matthew . Birth asphyxia in developing countries. In: Costello A, Manandhar D, editors. Improving Newborn Infant Health in Developing Countries. London: Imperial College Press; 2000. p. 233–272.
Sibley L, Sipe TA . What can a meta-analysis tell us about traditional birth attendant training and pregnancy outcomes? Midwifery 2004;20(1):51–60.
Kumar R . Training traditional birth attendants for resuscitation of newborns. Trop Doctor 1995;25:29–30.
Kumar R . Effect of training on the resuscitation practices of traditional birth attendants. Trans Roy Soc Trop Med Hyg 1994;88:159–160.
Bang AT, Reddy HM, Deshmukh MD, et al. Neonatal and infant mortality in the ten years (1993 to 2003) of the Gadchiroli field trial: Effect of home-based neonatal care. J Perinatol 1995;25:S92–107.
International Institute of Population Sciences. The National Family Health Survey 1998–99: The Key Findings. Mumbai: IIPS; 1999.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The Financial Support for this work came from The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, The Ford Foundation, Saving Newborn Lives, Save the Children, USA and The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bang, A., Bang, R., Baitule, S. et al. Management of Birth Asphyxia in Home Deliveries in Rural Gadchiroli: The Effect of Two Types of Birth Attendants and of Resuscitating with Mouth-to-Mouth, Tube-Mask or Bag–Mask. J Perinatol 25 (Suppl 1), S82–S91 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211275
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211275
This article is cited by
-
Community health workers at the dawn of a new era: 6. Recruitment, training, and continuing education
Health Research Policy and Systems (2021)
-
The impact of high intensity care around birth on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes
Health Economics Review (2020)
-
Identifying the know-do gap in evidence-based neonatal care practices among informal health care providers—a cross-sectional study from Ujjain, India
BMC Health Services Research (2020)
-
Comparison of perinatal outcomes in facilities before and after Global Network’s Helping Babies Breathe Implementation Study in Nagpur, India
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (2019)
-
Neonatal Resuscitation Capacity Building and Research on its Impact: Need of the Hour!
Indian Pediatrics (2019)