Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Trends in Prenatal Diagnosis of Critical Cardiac Defects in an Integrated Obstetric and Pediatric Cardiac Imaging Center

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Prenatal diagnosis of critical (requiring neonatal intervention) cardiac defects (critical congenital heart diseases (CCHD)) improves survival, yet detection of such malformations is poor. Our institution changed its practice and integrated a pediatric cardiologist into the perinatal team. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how this change affected the rate of detected congenital heart disease (CHD) and the diagnostic accuracy.

STUDY DESIGN: Obstetrical ultrasounds of mothers at high and normal risk for fetal CCHD at a single center between 1991 and 2001 were reviewed. Rate of detected CCHD, positive predictive values and false positives were compared before and after pediatric cardiology integration.

RESULTS: Between the first and second time periods, the rate of detected CCHD increased from 6.8/1000 ultrasounds to 12.9/1000 ultrasounds (p=0.007), and positive predictive value increased from 75 to 96%.

CONCLUSION: Collaboration with pediatric cardiology can significantly improve the rate of detected CCHD. These findings have significant implications for sonographer education and patient care.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buskens E, Grobbee DE, Frohn-Mulder IME, et al. Efficacy of routine fetal ultrasound screening for congenital heart disease in normal pregnancy. Circulation 1996;94:67–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stoll C, Alembik Y, Dott B . Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease. Prenat Diagn 1998;18:801–807.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hafner E, Scholler J, Schuchter K, Sterniste W, Philipp K . Detection of fetal congenital heart disease in a low-risk population. Prenat Diagn 1998;18:808–815.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Achiron R, Glaser J, Gelernter I, Hegesh J, Yagel S . Extended fetal echocardiographic examination for detecting cardiac malformations in low risk pregnancies. BMJ 1992;304:671–674.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sharland GK, Allan LD . Screening for congenital heart disease prenatally. Results of a 2.5 year study in the South East Thames Region. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:220–225.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stûmpflen I, Stûmpflen A, Wimmer M, Bernaschek G . Effect of detailed fetal echocardiography as part of routine prenatal ultrasonographic screening on detection of congenital heart disease. Lancet 1996;348:854–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tworetzky W, McElhinney DB, Reddy VM, Brook MM, Hanley FL, Silverman NH . Improved surgical outcome after fetal diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Circulation 2001;103:1269–1273.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bonnet D, Coltri A, Butera G, Fermont L, LeBidois J, Kachaner J . Detection of transposition of the great arteries in fetuses reduces neonatal morbidity and mortality. Circulation 1999;99:916–918.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar RK, Newberger JW, Gauvreau K, Kamenir SA, Hornberger LK . Comparison of outcome when hypoplastic left heart syndrome and transposition of the great arteries are diagnosed prenatally versus when diagnosis of these two conditions is made only postnatally. Am J Cardiol 1999;83:1649–1653.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Montana E, Khoury MJ, Cragan JD, Sharma S, Dhar P, Fyfe D . Trends and outcomes after prenatal diagnosis of congenital cardiac malformations by fetal echocardiography in a well defined birth population, Atlanta, Georgia, 1990 – 1994. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:1805–1809.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Allan LD, Crawford DC, Chita SK, Tynan MJ . Prenatal screening for congenital heart disease. BMJ 1986;292:1717–1719.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Berghella V, Pagotto L, Kaufman M, Huhta JC, Wapner RJ . Accuracy of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects. Fetal Diagn Therapy 2001;16:407–412.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Allan LD, Sharland GK, Milburn A, et al. Prospective diagnosis of 1,006 consecutive cases of congenital heart disease in the fetus. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:1452–1458.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. DeVore GR . Influence of prenatal diagnosis on congenital heart defects. Ann NY Acad Sci 1998;847:46–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chang AC, Huhta JC, Yoon GY, et al. Diagnosis, transport and outcome in fetuses with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;102:841–848.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Karen Ralph and Colleen Uchman for manuscript preparation; Denise Angst, DNSc for her critical reviews of the manuscript; and the following physicians for their clinical involvement during the study: James Keller, MD, Bruce Pielet, MD, Brian McCulloch, MD, Thomas Iannucci, MD, Ira DuBrow, MD, Deborah Bryk-Seva, MD, and Peter Sodt, MD.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Presented in part at the Annual Scientific Session of the Society for Maternal – Fetal Medicine, January 2002.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cuneo, B., Curran, L., Davis, N. et al. Trends in Prenatal Diagnosis of Critical Cardiac Defects in an Integrated Obstetric and Pediatric Cardiac Imaging Center. J Perinatol 24, 674–678 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211168

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211168

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links