Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Primary prevention of weight gain for women aged 25–34: the acceptability of treatment formats

International Journal of Obesity volume 24, pages 219–225 (2000)Cite this article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if treatment format will affect the willingness of women aged 25–34 to participate in a program for primary prevention of weight gain.

DESIGN: 102 normal-weight women aged 25–34 were randomized to one of three treatment formats (group meetings, correspondence course, no-treatment control). Acceptability was evaluated by determining the proportion of women participating in their assigned format. Efficacy was assessed by determining mean weight changes at post-treatment (10 weeks) and 6-month follow-up, and the proportions of women who remained at baseline weights.

RESULTS: Significantly fewer women chose to participate in a group format, compared to the correspondence course and no-treatment control (42%, 84% and 62%, respectively). However, the group format produced the largest short-term changes in weight (−1.9±1.8 kg, −1.1±2.1 kg and −0.2±1.3 kg, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: The format of prevention programs may influence the willingness of subjects to participate, as well as treatment outcome. Both format acceptability and efficacy should be considered in determining the overall effectiveness of a program.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brownell KD, Wadden TA . Etiology and treatment of obesity: understanding a serious, prevalent, and refractory disorder J Consult Clin Psychol 1992 60: 505–517.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. National Taskforce on the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity . Towards prevention of obesity: research directions Obes Res 1994 2: 571–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hennekens CH, Buring JE . Epidemiology in Medicine. Little, Brown & Co.: Boston, MA, 1987, p. 179.

  4. Lewis CE, Smith DE, Wallace DD, Williams OD, Bild DE, Jacobs DR . Seven-year trends in body weight and associations with lifestyle and behavioral characteristics in black and white young adults: the CARDIA study Am J Public Health 1997 87: 635–642.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Williamson DE, Kahn HS, Remington PL, Anda RE . The 10-year incidence of overweight and major weight gain in US adults Arch Intern Med 1990 150: 665–672.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yong LC, Kuller LH, Rutan G, Bunker C . Longitudinal study of blood pressure: changes and determinants from adolescence to middle age. The Dormont high school follow-up study, 1957–63 to 1989–1990 Am J Epidemiol 1993 138: 973–983.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang Z, Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Hunter DJ, Manson JE, Hennekens CH, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Willett WC . Dual effects of weight and weight gain on breast cancer risk JAMA 1997 278: 1407–1411.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Willett WC, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH . Weight, weight change and coronary heart disease in women. Risk within the ‘normal’ weight range JAMA 1995 273: 461–465.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Forster JL, Jeffery RW, Schmid TL, Kramer FM . Preventing weight gain in adults: a pound of prevention Health Psychol 1988 7: 515–525.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jeffery RW, French SA . Preventing weight gain in adults: design, methods and one year results from the Pound of Prevention study Int J Obes 1997 21: 457–464.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Garn SM, Pilkington JJ . Comparison of three-year weight and fat change distributions of lean and obese individuals Econ Food Nutr 1984 15: 7–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Simkin-Silverman L, Wing RR, Hansen DH, Klem ML, Pasagian-Macaulay A, Meilahn EN, Kuller LH . Prevention of cardiovascular risk factor elevations in healthy premenopausal women Prevent Med 1995 24: 509–517.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Matthews KA, Meilahn E, Kuller LH, Kelsey SF, Caggiula AW, Wing RR . Menopause and risk factors for coronary heart disease New Engl J Med 1989 321: 641–646.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Klem ML, Wing RR, Simkin-Silverman L, Kuller LH . The psychological consequences of weight gain prevention in healthy, premenopausal women Int J Eat Disord 1997 21: 167–174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jeffery RW, Hellerstedt WL, Schmid TL . Correspondence programs for smoking cessation and weight control: a comparison of two strategies in the Minnesota Heart Health Program Health Psychol 1990 9: 585–598.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Marshall NL . Combining work and family. In: Gallant SJ, Keita GP, Royak-Scaler R (eds). Health Care for Women: Psychological, Social and Behavioral Influences. American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, 1997, pp. 163–174.

  17. Venditti EM, Wing RR, Jakicic JM, Butler BA, Marcus MD . Weight cycling, psychological health, and binge eating in obese women J Consult Clin Psychol 1996 64: 400–405.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuehnel RH, Wadden TA . Binge eating disorder, weight cycling, and psychopathology Int J Eat Disord 1994 15: 321–329.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Little R, Yau L . Intent-to-treat analysis for longitudinal studies with drop-outs Biometrics 1996 52: 1324–1333.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the C. Everett Koop Foundation for the generous donation of lifestyle brochures. This study was supported by a pilot/feasibility grant from the Obesity and Nutrition Research Center, University of Pittsburgh.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    ML Klem, JE Viteri & RR Wing

Authors
  1. ML Klem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. JE Viteri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. RR Wing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ML Klem.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klem, M., Viteri, J. & Wing, R. Primary prevention of weight gain for women aged 25–34: the acceptability of treatment formats. Int J Obes 24, 219–225 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801117

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801117

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links