Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Peripheral Blood Stem Cells

Number of viable CD34+ cells reinfused predicts engraftment in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Abstract

Reduced CD34+ cell viability due to cryopreservation has unknown effects on subsequent hematopoietic engraftment in autologous transplantation. Thirty-six consecutive autologous peripheral stem cell collections were analyzed for absolute viable CD34+ cell numbers at the time of stem cell collection and prior to re-infusion. Viable CD34+ cells were enumerated using single platform flow cytometry and the molecular exclusion dye 7-amino actinomycin D. The median number of viable CD34+ cells was 3.6 × 106/kg at the time of harvest and 2.0 × 106/kg after thawing. When viable CD34+cells enumerated after thawing were <2.0, 2.0–5.0, or >5.0 × 106/kg, the median time to platelet engraftment was 17, 12 and 10 days, respectively (P < 0.05 for comparison of the group with <2.0 × 106/kg and the other two groups), and the median time to neutrophil engraftment was 13, 14 and 12 days, respectively (P = NS). A minimum of 2.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg was harvested in 33 of 36 patients (92%) but only 19 of 36 (52%) patients met this threshold at the time of reinfusion. The reduced numbers of viable CD34+ cells measured prior to re-infusion is associated with time to platelet engraftment and may be useful in monitoring stem cell loss during processing and identifying patients at risk of graft failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. To LB, Haylock DN, Simmons PJ, Juttner CA . The biology and clinical uses of blood stem cells Blood 1997 89: 2233 2258

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bender JG, To LB, Williams S, Schwartzberg LS . Defining a therapeutic dose of peripheral blood stem cells J Hematother 1992 1: 329 341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Katz F, Tindle RW, Sutherland DR, Greaves MF . Identification of a membrane glycoprotein associated with hematopoietic progenitor cells Leuk Res 1985 9: 191 198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sutherland DR, Keating A . The CD34 antigen: structure, biology and potential clinical applications J Hematother 1992 1: 115 129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berenson RJ, Andrewes RG, Bensinger WI et al. Antigen CD34-positive marrow cells engraft lethally irradiated baboons J Clin Invest 1988 81: 951 955

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Berenson RJ, Bensinger WI, Hill RS et al. Engraftment after infusion of CD34+ marrow cells in patients with breast cancer or neuroblastoma Blood 1991 77: 1717 1722

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sheridan WP, Begley CG, Juttner CA et al. Effect of peripheral blood progenitor cells mobilized by filgastrim (G-CSF) on platelet recovery after high dose chemotherapy Lancet 1992 339: 640 644

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Elias AD, Ayash L, Anderson KC et al. Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells by chemotherapy and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor for hematologic support after high dose intensification for breast cancer Blood 1992 79: 3036 3044

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schwartzberg LS, Birch R, Hazelton B et al. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization by chemotherapy with and without recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor J Hematother 1992 1: 317 327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Reiffers L, Leverger G, Marit G et al. Hematopoietic reconstitution after autologous blood stem cell transplantation In: Gale RP, Champlin RE (eds) Bone Marrow Transplantation: Current Controversies. Proceedings of Sandoz-UCLA Symposium Liss: New York 1988 p 313

    Google Scholar 

  11. Weaver CH, Hazelton B, Birch R et al. An analysis of engraftment kinetics as a function of the CD34 content of peripheral blood progenitor cell collections in 692 patients after the administration of myeloablative chemotherapy Blood 1995 86: 3961 3969

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ketterer N, Salles G, Raba M et al. High CD34 cell counts decrease hematologic toxicity of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation Blood 1998 91: 3148 3155

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Keeney M, Chin-Yee I, Weir K et al. Single platform flow cytometric absolute CD34+ cell counts based on the ISHAGE guidelines Cytometry 1998 34: 61 70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gratama JW, Keeney M, Sutherland DR . Enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells Curr Prot Cytometry 1999 6: 1 22

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sutherland DR, Anderson L, Keeney M et al. The ISHAGE guidelines for CD34+ cell determination by flow cytometry J Hematother 1996 5: 213 226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bensinger W, Appelbaum F, Rowley S et al. Factors that influence collection and engraftment of autologous peripheral-blood stem cells J Clin Oncol 1995 13: 2547 2555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tricot G, Jagannath S, Vesole D et al. Peripheral blood stem cell transplants for multiple myeloma: identification of favorable variables for rapid engraftment in 225 patients Blood 1995 85: 588 596

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Serke S, Johnsen HE . A European reference protocol for quality assessment and clinical validation of autologous haematopoietic blood progenitor and stem cell grafts Bone Marrow Transplant 2001 27: 463 470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Barnett D, Janossy G, Lubenko A et al. Guideline for the flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ haematopoietic stem cells Clin Lab Haematol 1999 21: 301 308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Loken MP . Peripheral blood stem cell quantitation In: Owens MA, Loken MP (eds) Flow Cytometry Principles for Clinical Laboratory Practice Wiley-Liss: New York 1995 pp 111 127

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yang H, Acker JP, Hannon J et al. Damage and protection of UC blood cells during cryopreservation Cytotherapy 2001 3: 377 386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Beaujean F, Hartmann O, Kuentz M et al. A simple, efficient washing procedure for cryopreserved human hematopoietic stem cells prior to reinfusion Bone Marrow Transplant 1991 8: 291 294

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ruiz-Arguelles GJ, Ruiz-Arguelles A, Perez-Romano B et al. Filgastrim-mobilized peripheral-blood stem cells can be stored at 4 degrees and used in autografts to rescue high-dose chemotherapy Am J Hematol 1995 48: 100 103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pettengell R, Woll PJ, O'Connor DA et al. Viability of haemopoietic progenitors from whole blood, bone marrow and leukapheresis product: effects of storage media, temperature and time Bone Marrow Transplant 1994 14: 703 709

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. De Magalhaes-Silverman M, Donnenberg AD, Lister J et al. Factors influencing mobilization and engraftment in patients with metastatic breast cancer undergoing PBSC transplantation J Hematother 1999 8: 167 172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Brocklebank AM, Sparrow RL . Enumeration of CD34+ cells in cord blood: a variation on a single-platform flow cytometric method based on the ISHAGE gating strategy Cytometry 2001 46: 254 261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to recognize the statistical support of Mr Larry Stitt and Ms Leslie Gray-Statchuk and the administrative support of Ms Elizabeth Wood.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allan, D., Keeney, M., Howson-Jan, K. et al. Number of viable CD34+ cells reinfused predicts engraftment in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 29, 967–972 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703575

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703575

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links