Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Myeloma

High-dose melphalan with G-CSF-stimulated whole blood rescue followed by stem cell harvesting and busulphan/cyclophosphamide with autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma

Abstract

In 90 consecutive patients with multiple myeloma, we investigated the feasibility of administering a tandem high-dose therapy regimen, using whole blood for rescue after the first and leucapheresis harvested between the two high doses, for rescue after the second high dose. After 5 days of G-CSF 1 litre of whole blood (WB) was obtained, left undisturbed at 4°C and reinfused 24 h after HDM (140 mg/m2). Patients not in progression after 3–6 months were again mobilised, leucapheresed and treated with busulphan 16 mg/kg and cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg (Bu/Cy) and reinfusion. In 90 patients, WB contained a mean (range) of 0.57 (0.02–3.22) × 106/kg CD34+ cells. Recovery after HDM was in 13 days for granulocytes and in 18 days for platelets, with 11 patients not recovering within 3 months. There were three toxic deaths. Sixty-six patients qualified for harvesting after HDM. In the first 11, marrow was harvested. The subsequent 55 patients were mobilised and in 45 the preset minimum of 1.5 × 106 CD34+ cells was obtained. Forty-nine patients actually received Bu/Cy. Recovery after Bu/Cy and marrow reinfusion was in 35 days for granulocytes and 20 days for platelets, with two of five patients not recovering after 3 months. After Bu/Cy and leucapheresis reinfusion, recovery was in 17 days for granulocytes and in 34 days for platelets. Nine patients did not recover within 3 months. There were four toxic deaths. The median overall survival from diagnosis for patients receiving HDM was 49 months and for patients also receiving Bu/Cy, 84 months. We conclude that WB rescue after HDM followed by leucapheresis and a second transplant is feasible in the majority of patients. Better mobilisation techniques are required to increase the number of patients who can receive the second transplant. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2001) 27, 925–931.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bersagel DE . Melphalan/prednisone vs drug combinations for plasma cell myeloma Eur J Haematol 1989 43: (Suppl. 51) 117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gregory WM, Richards MA, Malpas JS . Combination chemotherapy vs melphalan prednisone in the treatment of multiple myeloma: an overview of published trials J Clin Oncol 1992 10: 334–342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barlogie B, Hall R, Zander A et al. High-dose melphalan with autologous bone marrow transplantation for multiple myeloma Blood 1986 67: 1298–1301

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cunningham D, Paz-Ares L, Milan S et al. High-dose melphalan and autologous bone marrow transplantation as consolidation in previously untreated myeloma J Clin Oncol 1994 12: 759–783

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM et al. A prospective randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma New Engl J Med 1996 335: 91–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barlogie B, Jagannath S, Vesole DH et al. Superiority of tandem autologous transplantation over standard therapy for previously untreated multiple myeloma Blood 1997 89: 789–793

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Harousseau JL, Milpied N, Laporte JP et al. Double intensive-therapy in high risk multiple myeloma Blood 1992 79: 2827–2833

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldschmidt H, Hegenbart U, Wallmeier M et al. Factors influencing collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells following high-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony stimulating factor in patients with multiple myeloma Br J Haematol 1997 98: 736–744

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Seiden MV, Schlossman R, Andersen J et al. Non-clonal antibody-purged bone marrow transplantation therapy for multiple myeloma Leuk Lymphoma 1995 17: 87–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pilarsk IM, Belch AR . Circulating monoclonal B cells expressing P glycoprotein may be a reservoir of multidrug resistant disease in multiple myeloma Blood 1994 83: 724–736

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ossenkoppele GJ, Schuurhuis GJ, Jonkhoff AR et al. High dose melphalan with reinfusion of unprocessed, G-CSF-primed whole blood is effective and non-toxic therapy in multiple myeloma Eur J Cancer 1996 32A: 2058–2063

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Copelan EA, Tutschka PJ . Marrow transplantation following busulphan and cyclophosphamide in multiple myeloma Bone Marrow Transplant 1988 3: 363–365

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kreuk AM de, Ossenkoppele GJ, Meijer CJLM et al. Prognostic factors for survival of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation Bone Marrow Transplant 1996 16: 963–971

    Google Scholar 

  14. Barlogie B, Smith L, Alexanian R . Effective treatment of advanced multiple myeloma refractory to alkylating agents New Engl J Med 1984 310: 1353–1356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Buzaid AC, Durie BG . Management of refractory multiple myeloma: a review J Clin Oncol 1988 6: 889–905

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Alexanian R, Barlogie B, Dixon D . High-dose glucocorticoid treatment for resistant multiple myeloma Ann Intern Med 1986 105: 8–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vesole DH, Crowley JJ, Catahatourian R et al. High-dose melphalan with autotransplantation for refractory multiple myeloma: results of a Southwest Oncology Group phase II trial J Clin Oncol 1999 17: 2173–2179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Barlogie B, Jagannath S, Desikan KR et al. Total therapy with tandem transplants for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma Blood 1999 93: 55–65

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Attal M, Harousseau J-L, Facon T et al. Single versus double transplantation in myeloma: a prospective randomized trial of the inter groupe francophone du myelome (IFM) Blood 2000 96 (Suppl.): 557a

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mitterer M, Oduncu F, Lanthaler AJ . The relationship between monoclonal myeloma precursor B cells in the peripheral blood stem cell harvests and the clinical response of multiple myeloma patients Br J Haematol 1999 106: 737–743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schuurhuis GJ, Monnee-v Muijen M, Oberink JW et al. Large populations of non-clonogenic early apoptotic CD34-positive cells are present in frozen-thawed peripheral blood stem cell transplants Bone Marrow Transplant 2000 27: 487–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Facon Th, Harousseau J-L, Maloisel F et al. Stem cell factor in combination with filgrastim after chemotherapy improves peripheral blood progenitor cell yield and reduces apheresis requirements in multiple myeloma patients: a randomized controlled trial Blood 1999 94: 1218–1225

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank IJM Gloudemans and AM de Kreuk for their contribution to this study. We also thank the nursing staff for their care for these patients.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huijgens, P., Dekker-van Roessel, H., Jonkhoff, A. et al. High-dose melphalan with G-CSF-stimulated whole blood rescue followed by stem cell harvesting and busulphan/cyclophosphamide with autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 27, 925–931 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703013

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703013

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links