Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Does vaginal delivery mitigate or strengthen the intergenerational association of overweight and obesity? Findings from the Boston Birth Cohort

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

The intergenerational association of obesity may be driven by mother-to-newborn transmission of microbiota at birth. Yet cesarean delivery circumvents newborn acquisition of vaginal microbiota, and has been associated with greater childhood adiposity. Here we examined the independent and joint associations of maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI; kg m−2) and delivery mode with childhood overweight or obesity.

Subjects/Methods:

We prospectively followed 1441 racially and ethnically diverse mother–child dyads in the Boston Birth Cohort until age 5 years (range: 2.0–8.0 years). We used logistic regression to examine the independent and joint associations of delivery mode (cesarean and vaginal delivery) and pre-pregnancy BMI with childhood overweight or obesity (age–sex-specific BMI 85th percentile).

Results:

Of 1441 mothers, 961 delivered vaginally and 480 by cesarean. Compared with vaginally delivered children, cesarean delivered children had 1.4 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1–1.8) times greater odds of becoming overweight or obese in childhood, after adjustment for maternal age at delivery, race/ethnicity, education, air pollution exposure, pre-pregnancy BMI, pregnancy weight gain and birth weight. Compared with children born vaginally to normal weight mothers, after multivariable adjustment, odds of childhood overweight or obesity were highest in children born by cesarean delivery to obese mothers (odds ratio (OR): 2.8; 95% CI: 1.9–4.1), followed by children born by cesarean delivery to overweight mothers (OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.5–3.2), then children born vaginally to obese mothers (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.3–2.6) and finally children born vaginally to overweight mothers (OR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.2–2.3).

Conclusions:

In our racially and ethnically diverse cohort, cesarean delivery and pre-pregnancy overweight and obesity were associated with childhood overweight or obesity. Needed now are prospective studies that integrate measures of the maternal and infant microbiome, and other potentially explanatory covariates, to elucidate the mechanisms driving this association and to explore whether exposure to vaginal microbiota in cesarean delivered newborns may be an innovative strategy to combat the intergenerational cycle of obesity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barros FC, Victora CG . Maternal-child health in Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil: major conclusions from comparisons of the 1982, 1993, and 2004 birth cohorts. Cad Saude Publica 2008; 24: S461–S467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Heslehurst N, Ells LJ, Simpson H, Batterham A, Wilkinson J, Summerbell CD . Trends in maternal obesity incidence rates, demographic predictors, and health inequalities in 36 821 women over a 15-year period. BJOG 2007; 114: 187–194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chu SY, Kim SY, Bish CL . Prepregnancy obesity prevalence in the United States, 2004-2005. Matern Child Health J 2009; 13: 614–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Whitaker RC . Predicting preschooler obesity at birth: the role of maternal obesity in early pregnancy. Pediatrics 2004; 114: e29–e36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Drake AJ, Reynolds RM . Impact of maternal obesity on offspring obesity and cardiometabolic disease risk. Reproduction 2010; 140: 387–398.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Widen EM, Whyatt RM, Hoepner LA, Mueller NT, Ramirez-Carvey J, Oberfield SE et al. Gestational weight gain and obesity, adiposity and body size in African-American and Dominican children in the Bronx and Northern Manhattan. Matern Child Nutr 2015; 12: 918–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yu Z, Han S, Zhu J, Sun X, Ji C, Guo X . Pre-pregnancy body mass index in relation to infant birth weight and offspring overweight/obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8: e61627.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chu SY, Kim SY, Schmid CH, Dietz PM, Callaghan WM, Lau J et al. Maternal obesity and risk of cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2007; 8: 385–394.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Li HT, Zhou YB, Liu JM . The impact of cesarean section on offspring overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes 2013; 37: 893–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ridaura VK, Faith JJ, Rey FE, Cheng J, Duncan AE, Kau AL et al. Gut microbiota from twins discordant for obesity modulate metabolism in mice. Science 2013; 341: 1241214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mueller NT, Shin H, Pizoni A, Werlang IC, Matte U, Goldani MZ et al. Birth mode-dependent association between pre-pregnancy maternal weight status and the neonatal intestinal microbiome. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 23133.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang X, Zuckerman B, Pearson C, Kaufman G, Chen C, Wang G et al. Maternal cigarette smoking, metabolic gene polymorphism, and infant birth weight. JAMA 2002; 287: 195–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mueller NT, Whyatt R, Hoepner L, Oberfield S, Dominguez-Bello MG, Widen EM et al. Prenatal exposure to antibiotics, cesarean section and risk of childhood obesity. Int J Obes 2015; 39: 665–670.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nachman RM, Mao G, Zhang X, Hong X, Chen Z, Soria CS et al. Intrauterine inflammation and maternal exposure to ambient PM during preconception and specific periods of pregnancy: the Boston Birth Cohort. Environ Health Perspect 2016; 124: 1608–1615.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bernardi JR, Pinheiro TV, Mueller NT, Goldani HA, Gutierrez MR, Bettiol H et al. Cesarean delivery and metabolic risk factors in young adults: a Brazilian birth cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr 2015; 102: 295–301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Netea MG, Quintin J, van der Meer JW . Trained immunity: a memory for innate host defense. Cell Host Microbe 2011; 9: 355–361.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hooper LV, Littman DR, Macpherson AJ . Interactions between the microbiota and the immune system. Science 2012; 336: 1268–1273.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Li M, Fallin MD, Riley A, Landa R, Walker SO, Silverstein M et al. The association of maternal obesity and diabetes with autism and other developmental disabilities. Pediatrics 2016; 137: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Boston Birth Cohort (the parent study) is supported in part by the March of Dimes PERI grants (20-FY02-56 and 21-FY07-605), and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants (R21ES011666, R21HD066471 and R01HD041702). The follow-up study is supported in part by the Maternal and Child Health Bureau grant (R40MC27443) and the NIH grants (U01AI090727, R21AI079872, 2R01HD041702 and R01HD086013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N T Mueller.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on International Journal of Obesity website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mueller, N., Mao, G., Bennet, W. et al. Does vaginal delivery mitigate or strengthen the intergenerational association of overweight and obesity? Findings from the Boston Birth Cohort. Int J Obes 41, 497–501 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2016.219

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2016.219

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links