Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:

Nutritional epidemiology data should be analyzed by nutritional epidemiologists

International Journal of Obesity volume 39, page 1180 (2015)Cite this article

Subjects

The Energy Balance Working Group recently reported on the inaccuracy of self-report energy intake (EI) and issued a twin plea for researchers to stop using these data as outcomes and for newer, more accurate measures to be developed.1 I could not agree more with their conclusions; what concerns me is that this needs to be conveyed to the research community. The recognition that self-report EI data should not be used as outcomes or predictors in research has been known since the last century and repeatedly conveyed since.2, 3 All intake data are underreported in self-reports and the reasons go beyond just recall bias. However, as these underreports are more or less uniform across most food groups, when one adjusts for EI in a nutrient density model, the bias on the estimation of these food groups is minimized.4 The need to use these nutrient density models and the underlying rationale for their use is something that even the most basic nutritional epidemiology course teaches. Therefore, the conclusion not included in the Energy Balance Working Group’s paper is that individuals without nutritional epidemiology training should not be attempting nutritional epidemiology. That this occurs frequently has long been a source of concern to me; as a trained genetic epidemiologist I cannot recall a genetic paper or a genetic grant being put forward without the involvement of a scientist with training in genetics. However, frequently in study sections and in manuscript reviews I see studies involving nutrition data that are not treated with the same respect. It is time for the scientific community to stop this; Editors should send nutritional epidemiology manuscripts to reviewers with the necessary training, and nutritional epidemiologists should be well-represented on the relevant study sections. To summarize, I echo The Energy Balance Working Group’s urgency for new measures of EI to be developed and for self-report measures to be dropped as outcomes or predictors from the literature. However, the problems reported not only run to EI but also to other self-report nutritional intake variables and I urge the scientific community to come together and improve nutritional science using the expertise contained within.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Dhurandhar NV, Schoeller D, Brown AW, Heymsfield SB, Thomas D, Sorendsen TI et al. Energy balance measurement: when something is not better than nothing. Int J Obes (Lond) 2014. e-pub ahead of print 13 November 2014; doi:10.1038/ijo.2014.199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Willett WC, Howe GR, Kushi LH . Adjustment for total energy intake in epidemiologic studies. Am J Clin Nutr 1997; 65: 1220S–1228S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Willett W, Stamfer M . Implications of total energy intake for epidemiologic analyses. In: Nutritional Epidemiology. Willet Wed. Oxford University Press: New York, 1998, pp 273–301.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Voss S, Kroke A, Klipstein-Grobusch K, Boeing H . Is macronutrient composition of dietary intake data affected by underreporting? Results from the EPIC-Potsdam Study. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Eur J Clin Nutr 1998; 52: 119–126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. USDA/ARS Children’s Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

    A C Frazier-Wood

Authors
  1. A C Frazier-Wood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A C Frazier-Wood.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frazier-Wood, A. Nutritional epidemiology data should be analyzed by nutritional epidemiologists. Int J Obes 39, 1180 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.79

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.79

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links