Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Outcomes of lateral retroperitoneal reservoir placement of three-piece penile prosthesis in patients following radical prostatectomy

Abstract

While placement of a three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) with a midline reservoir can be performed with favorable outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP), postoperative fascial scarring can introduce surgical complexity, increase intra-operative complications and/or potential obstacles for future inguinal and/or perineal surgeries. We describe the implantation of the IPP with lateral reservoir placement through a separate incision to avoid surgical complications. We obtained clinical characteristics of all patients (1998–2009) who underwent RP before IPP placement with lateral reservoir placement (cases). For comparison, patients who underwent IPP placement with midline reservoir placement were also identified (controls). Thirty-one patients with a history of RP underwent IPP placement using the lateral placement technique without intra-operative or post-operative complications. There were no significant differences in the intra-operative complication rate among 31 control patients. However, at a median follow-up of >2 years, there was a significantly higher rate of post-operative complications in controls, likely reflecting the increased co-morbidities in this group. The results of this study suggest that three-piece IPP with lateral retroperitoneal reservoir implantation is associated with comparable long-term outcomes and can be performed safely in patients who have previously undergone RP.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stephenson RA, Mori M, Hsieh YC, Beer TM, Stanford JL, Gilliland FD et al. Treatment of erectile dysfunction following therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: patient reported use and outcomes from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. J Urol 2005; 174: 646–650; discussion 650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Penson DF, McLerran D, Feng Z, Li L, Albertsen PC, Gilliland FD et al. 5-year urinary and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy: results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. J Urol 2008; 179 (5 Suppl): S40–S44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. User HM, Hairston JH, Zelner DJ, McKenna KE, McVary KT . Penile weight and cell subtype specific changes in a post-radical prostatectomy model of erectile dysfunction. J Urol 2003; 169: 1175–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schover LR, Fouladi RT, Warneke CL, Neese L, Klein EA, Zippe C et al. The use of treatments for erectile dysfunction among survivors of prostate carcinoma. Cancer 2002; 95: 2397–2407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sexton WJ, Benedict JF, Jarow JP . Comparison of long-term outcomes of penile prostheses and intracavernosal injection therapy. J Urol 1998; 159: 811–815.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Montorsi F, Rigatti P, Carmignani G, Corbu C, Campo B, Ordesi G et al. AMS three-piece inflatable implants for erectile dysfunction: a long-term multi-institutional study in 200 consecutive patients. Eur Urol 2000; 37: 50–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lane BR, Abouassaly R, Angermeier KW, Montague DK . Three-piece inflatable penile prostheses can be safely implanted after radical prostatectomy through a transverse scrotal incision. Urology 2007; 70: 539–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schaeffer AJ, Clemens JQ, Ferrari M, Stamey TA . The male bulbourethral sling procedure for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence. J Urol 1998; 159: 1510–1515.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Montague DK, Angermeir KW . Surgical approaches for penile prosthesis implantation: penoscrotal vs infrapubic. Int J Impot Res 2003; 15 (Suppl 5): S134–S135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson SK, Delk II JR, Henry GD, Siegel AL . New surgical technique for sphincter urinary control system using upper transverse scrotal incision. J Urol 2003; 169: 261–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Smaldone MC, Cannon Jr GM, Benoit RM . Subcutaneous reservoir placement during penile prosthesis implantation. Can J Urol 2006; 13: 3351–3352.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B T Helfand.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hartman, R., Helfand, B. & McVary, K. Outcomes of lateral retroperitoneal reservoir placement of three-piece penile prosthesis in patients following radical prostatectomy. Int J Impot Res 22, 279–283 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2010.16

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2010.16

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links