Skip to main content
Log in

Miracles and the limits of medical knowledge

  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In considering whether medical miracles occur, thelimits of epistemology bring us to confront ourmetaphysical worldview of medicine and nature ingeneral. This raises epistemological questions of ahigher order. David Hume's understanding of miraclesas violations of the laws of nature assumes thatnature is completely regular, whereas doctrines suchas C. S. Peirce's ``tychism'' hold that there is anelement of absolute chance in the workings of theuniverse. Process philosophy gives yet another viewof the working of nature. Physicians have noepistemological grounds for declaring any cure to bemiraculous. Miracles are theological (orphilosophical) entities, and not medical entities. All physicians can do is to determine whether or nota cure is scientifically inexplicable according to thecurrent epistemological standards of medical science. As these standards change, what is currentlyunexplainable may become explainable. However, we canalso come to realize that our current explanations arein fact unsatisfactory. Our justifications ofknowledge claims about miracles will depend on ourviews about determinism and indeterminism. If theuniverse is not a deterministic one, we should be opento the possibility of encountering what appear to usas sui generis events. These would not beviolations of immutable laws of nature, butmanifestations of the true workings of nature, andcertainly causes for wonder.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ai, A.L., R.E. Dunkle, C. Peterson and S.F. Bolling: 1998, 'The Role of Private Prayer in Psychological Recovery Among Midlife and Aged Patients Following Cardiac Surgery', Gerontologist 38, 591-601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, St. Thomas: 1928, Summa Contra Gentiles, book 3, trans. the English Dominican Fathers from the latest Leonine ed. London: Burns Oates & Washbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, St. Thomas: 1975, Summa Theologiae, vol. 14, trans. T. C. O'Brien. London: Blackfriars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustine, St.: 1982, The Literal Meaning of Genesis, trans. J.H. Taylor. New York: Newman Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catholic News Service: 1997, 'Cure of Brockton Girl Recognized as Miracle', The Pilot 168(15), April 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flew, A.: 1990, 'Fogelin on Hume on Miracles', Hume Studies 16, 141-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogelin, R.J.: 1990, 'What Hume Actually Said About Miracles', Hume Studies 16, 81-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, C.: 1968, Beyond Humanism: Essays in the Philosophy of Nature. Lincoln: Bison, University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, C.: 1991, 'A Reply to My Critics', in: L.E. Hahn (ed.), The Philosophy of Charles Hartshorne. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court, pp. 569-731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P.F.: 1965, 'The Miraculous', American Philosophical Quarterly 2, 43-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, J.: 1994, Reported Miracles: A Critique of Hume. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D.: 1996, 'Of Miracles', Part 10 of An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1748), reprinted in Hume on Miracles, ed. and introduced by S. Tweyman. Bristol, England: Thoemmes Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J.S.: 1996, 'How Prayer Heals: A Theoretical Model', Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine 2, 66-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C.S.: 1978, Miracles. New York: Collier Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, S. and L.J. Schneiderman: 1996, 'Miracles or Limits: What Message from the Medical Marketplace?', H E C Forum 8, 103-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon, A.: 1967, ' "Miracle" and "Paradox" ', American Philosophical Quarterly 4, 308-314.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Laoire, S.: 1997, 'An Experimental Study of the Effects of Distant, Intercessory Prayer on Self-esteem, Anxiety, and Depression', Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine 3, 38-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S.: 1931, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, ed. C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss, 6 volumes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, L., I. Ahmed, S. Hall, C. Sargent and C. Adams: 1998, 'Intercessory Prayer for Ill Health: A Systematic Review', Forschende Komplementarmedizin 5 Suppl. S1, 82-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinburne, R.: 1970, The Concept of Miracle. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillich, P.: 1967, Systematic Theology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N.: 1929, Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N.: 1933, Adventures of Ideas. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N.: 1958, Modes of Thought. New York: Capricorn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, K.L.: 1996, Making Saints: How the Catholic Church Determines Who Becomes a Saint, Who Doesn't, and Why. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stempsey, W.E. Miracles and the limits of medical knowledge. Med Health Care Philos 5, 1–9 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014275232713

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014275232713

Navigation