Skip to main content
Log in

Tensile force testing of optimized coin-shaped titanium implant attachment kinetics in the rabbit tibiae

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, the bone response of titanium implants at early bone healing stages, was evaluated using a tensile test. Test surface of coin-shaped cp. titanium implants were standardized by grit blasting with TiO2, grain size 180–220 μm. The surface topography of the implant specimens was examined by SEM, and by a confocal laser scanner for evaluation of S a, S t and S dr. The implants were placed onto the leveled site on the tibia of 12 New Zealand White rabbits, 4 implants in each animal. The rabbits were divided into three groups with different observation times i.e. 2, 4 and 6 weeks. The retention of 12 implants were tested by measuring the pull-out force needed to detach the implant from the bone. There was a significant increase in implant retention from 2 to 4 and to 6 weeks healing time (p<0.05). Four implants from each time point were randomly chosen for histological evaluation. The histological appearance of the implant–bone interface at the different healing times showed noticeable differences in the degree of bone healing and maturation, suggesting that, in rabbits, 6 weeks healing time is a suitable observation point for tensile testing of surface optimized osseointegrating implants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. F. Williams, in ‘Defenitions in Biomaterials’ (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987) p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. Albrektsson, P. I. Branemark, H. A. Hansson and J. Lindstrom, Acta Orthop. Scand. 52 (1981) 155.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Buser, et al., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 25 (1991) 889.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Wennerberg, T. Albrektsson and J. Lausmaa, ibid. 30 (1996) 251.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. H. Han, C. B. Johansson, A. Wennerberg and T. Albrektsson, Clin. Oral Implants Res. 9 (1998) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Lausmaa, in ‘Titanium in Medicine, 2001’, edited by D. M. Brunette, P. Tengvall, M. Textor and P. Thomsen (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001) p. 231.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. T. Bowers, J. C. Keller, B. A. Randolph, D. G. Wick and C. M. Michaels, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 7 (1992) 302.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. C. Keller, C. M. Stanford, J. P. Wightman, R. A. Draughn and R. Zaharias, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 28 (1994) 939.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Y. Martin et al., ibid. 29 (1995) 389.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. D. Boyan, T. W. Hummert, D. D. Dean and Z. Schwartz, Biomaterials 17 (1996) 137.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. E. Feighan, V. M. Goldberg, D. Davy, J. A. Parr and S. Stevenson, J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 77-A(9) (1995) 1380.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Baker, R. M. London and R. O'Neal, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 14 (1999) 722.

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. Ogawa et al., J. Dent. Res. 79 (2000) 1857.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Svehla et al., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 51 (2000) 15.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Nishiguchi et al., ibid. 54 (2001) 198.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Ozeki, T. Yuhta, H. Aoki, I. Nishimura and Y. Fukui, Biomed. Mater. Eng. 11 (2001) 63.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Kaneko et al., Biomaterials 22 (2001) 875.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Nishiguchi et al., ibid. 22 (2001) 2525.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Svehla, P. Morberg, W. Bruce, B. Zicat and W. R. Walsh, J. Arthroplasty 17 (2002) 304.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Branemark, L. O. Ohrnell, P. Nilsson and P. Thomsen, Biomaterials 18 (1997) 969.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Buser et al., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 45 (1999) 75.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. Li et al., ibid. 60 (2002) 325.

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. Yoshi et al., ibid. 22 (1988) 327.

    Google Scholar 

  24. W. Q. Yan et al., ibid. 37 (1997) 267.

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Lin, H. Xu, X. Zhang and K. De Groot, ibid. 43 (1998) 113.

    Google Scholar 

  26. H. J. RØnold and J. E. Ellingsen, Biomaterials 23 (2002) 4211.

    Google Scholar 

  27. H. J. RØnold and J. E. Ellingsen, ibid. 23 (2002) 2201.

    Google Scholar 

  28. H. J. RØnold, S. P. Lyngstadaas and J. E. Ellingsen, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. (in press)

  29. W. E. Roberts, R. K. Smith, Y. Zilberman, P. G. Mozsary and R. S. Smith, Am. J. Orthod. 86 (1984) 95.

    Google Scholar 

  30. L. Sennerby, P. Thomsen and L. E. Ericson, J. Mater. Sci. 4 (1993) 240.

    Google Scholar 

  31. C. Larsson, M. Esposito, H. Liao and P. Thomsen, in ‘Titanium in Medicine, 2001’, edited by D. M. Brunette, P. Tengvall, M. Textor and P. Thomsen (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001) p. 587.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Jacob Rønold.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rønold, H.J., Ellingsen, J.E. & Lyngstadaas, S.P. Tensile force testing of optimized coin-shaped titanium implant attachment kinetics in the rabbit tibiae. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 14, 843–849 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025622407727

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025622407727

Keywords

Navigation