Skip to main content
Log in

The Philosophy of Critical Realism—An Opportunity for Information Systems Research

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is argued that recent research in the information systems field has tended to either emphasise the structural/collective dimension or the agency/individual dimension, not both. Structuration theory is a more recent attempt to address both agency and structure, however there are a number of issues with the use of structuration theory in information systems research, not the least of which is its lack of recognition of the temporal and longitudinal nature of information systems development. A relatively new philosophy, critical realism, provides the potential for a new approach to social investigations in its provision of an ontology for the analytical separation of structure and agency. The philosophy is introduced and its implications for sociological investigation are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archer M. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar R. A Realist Theory of Science. Sussex: Harvester Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar R. The Possibility of Naturalism. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar R. Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. London: Verso, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar R. Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to ContemporaryPhilosophy. London: Verso, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar R. Philosophy and the Idea of Freedom. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chia R. The problem of reflexivity in organisational research: Towards a postmodern science of organization Organization 1996;3:31–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW. The Design of Inquiring Systems, New York: Basic Books, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW. Management science: Science of managing and managing of science, Interfaces 1994;24(4):99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier A. Critical Realism: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Roy Bhaskar. London: Verso, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craib I. Modern Social Theory: from Parsons to Habermas. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craib I. Anthony Giddens. New York: Routledge, 1992b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galliers RD. Choosing information systems research approaches. In Galliers RD, ed. Information Systems Research: Issues, Methods, and Practial Guidelines, Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1992:144–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia L, Quek F. Qualitative research in information systems: Time to be subjective? In: Lee AS, Liebenau J and DeGross JI, eds. Information Systems and Qualitative Research. London: Chapman and Hall, 1997;542–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci A. Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layder D. New Strategies in Social Research: An Introduction and Guide. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles M, Huberman M. Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science 1992; 3(3):398–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper K. The Open Society and its Enemies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porpora DV. Four concepts of social structure. Journal for the Study of Social Behaviour 1989;19:198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter S. Critical realist ethnography: The case of racism and professionalism in a medical setting. Sociology 1993;27(4):591–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed MI. In praise of duality and dualism: Rethinking agency and structure in organisational analysis. Organization Studies 1997;18(1):21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau PM. Postmodernism and the Social Sciences: Insights, Inroads and Intrusions, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland G. Archetypes of systems design. Systems Practice 1995;8(3):277–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer RA. Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. London: Routledge, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle JR. The Construction of Social Reality. NewYork: Free Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas H. Panoptic reason and the search for totality: A critical assessment of the critical systems perspective. Human Relations: 1992;45:7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W. Can we secure future-responsive management through systems thinking and design? Interfaces 1994;24(4):26–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G. Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations. Chichester: Wiley, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G. Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems 1995;4:74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington R. Sociological pluralism, institutions and managerial agency. In: Hassard J and Parker M, eds. Towards a New Theory of Organizations. New York: Routledge, 1994;53–74.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dobson, P.J. The Philosophy of Critical Realism—An Opportunity for Information Systems Research. Information Systems Frontiers 3, 199–210 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011495424958

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011495424958

Navigation