Skip to main content
Log in

EMG Biofeedback: The Effects of CRF, FR, VR, FI, and VI Schedules of Reinforcement on the Acquisition and Extinction of Increases in Forearm Muscle Tension

  • Published:
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biofeedback was used to increase forearm-muscle tension. Feedback was delivered under continuous reinforcement (CRF), variable interval (VI), fixed interval (FI), variable ratio (VR), and fixed ratio (FR) schedules of reinforcement when college students increased their muscle tension (electromyograph, EMG) above a high threshold. There were three daily sessions of feedback, and Session 3 was immediately followed by a session without feedback (extinction). The CRF schedule resulted in the highest EMG, closely followed by the FR and VR schedules, and the lowest EMG scores were produced by the FI and VI schedules. Similarly, the CRF schedule resulted in the greatest amount of time-above-threshold and the VI and FI schedules produced the lowest time-above-threshold. The highest response rates were generated by the FR schedule, followed by the VR schedule. The CRF schedule produced relatively low response rates, comparable to the rates under the VI and FI schedules. Some of the data are consistent with the partial-reinforcement-extinction effect. The present data suggest that different schedules of feedback should be considered in muscle-strengthening contexts such as during the rehabilitation of muscles following brain damage or peripheral nervous-system injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Amsel, A., & Roussel, J. (1952). Motivational properties of frustration: I. Effect on a running response of the addition of frustration to the motivational complex. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 363-368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, E. B., & Epstein, L. H. (1978). A biofeedback primer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brener, J., Kleinman, R. A., & Goesling, W. J. (1969). The effects of different exposures to augmented sensory feedback on the control of heart rate. Psychophysiology, 5, 510-516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colgan, M. (1977). Effects of binary and proportional feedback on bidirectional control of heart rate. Psychophysiology, 14, 187-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croce, R. V. (1986). The effects of EMG biofeedback on strength acquisition. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 11, 299-310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ely, R. O., & Hart, J. D. (1980). Continuous vs. intermittent schedules of EMG biofeedback. American Journal of Clinical Biofeedback, 3, 48-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, E. R. (1995). Biofeedback-assisted musculoskeletal therapy and neuromuscular re-education. In M. S. Schwartz & Associates (Eds.), Biofeedback: A practitioner's guide (pp. 560-593). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, E. H., & Elder, S. T. (1982). A factorial comparison of schedule and bilateral locus of diastolic blood pressure-contingent feedback. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 5, 117-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, E. H., & Elder, S. T. (1990). Conditioned diastolic blood pressure: The effects of magnitude of acquired response and feedback schedules on resistance to extinction. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 9, 13-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatchel, R. J. (1974). Frequency of feedback and learned heart rate control. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 272-283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harver, A., & Kotses, H. (1985). Spacing of training and resistance to extinction in frontal EMG conditioning. Clinical Biofeedback and Health, 8, 22-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, J. P. (1980). The effects of operant reinforcement schedules on the modification of human heart rate. Psychophysiology, 17, 559-567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honig, W. K., & Staddon, J. E. R. (Eds.). (1977). Handbook of operant behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, I. F., Gulick, D. T. & Lukasiewicz, W. C., III (1999). Effect of visual feedback and verbal encouragement on eccentric quadriceps and hamstrings peak torque. Sports Medicine Training and Rehabilitation, 9, 61-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, D. E. (1995). Biofeedback in neuromuscular re-education and gait training. In M. S. Schwartz & Associates (Eds.), Biofeedback: A practitioner's guide (pp. 525-559). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattal, K. A., & Perone, M. (Eds.) (1998). Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBoeuf, A., & Wilson, C. (1978). Importance of imagery in maintenance of feedback-assisted relaxation over extinction trials. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 824-826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, R., Deisinger, J. A., Wall, J. R., Ford, L., & Cassisi, J. E. (1995). EMG feedback-assisted postoperative rehabilitation of minor arthroscopic knee surgeries. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 35, 218-223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh, N. J. (1974). The psychology of animal learning. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, J. E. (1998). Learning and behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrady, A., Olson, R. P., & Kroon, J. S. (1995). Biobehavioral treatment of essential hypertension. In M. S. Schwartz & Associates (Eds.), Biofeedback: A practitioner's guide (pp. 445-467). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middaugh, S. J., & Miller, M. C. (1980). Electromyographic feedback: Effects on voluntary muscle contractions in paretic subjects. Archives of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation, 61, 24-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. E., & DiCara, L. (1967). Instrumental learning of heart rate changes in curarized rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 63, 12-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, J. D., Thomson, M. A., & Fuoco, A. R. (1998). Electromyographic biofeedback to improve lower extremity function after stroke: A meta-analysis. Archives of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation, 79, 134-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morely, S. (1979). Partial reinforcement in human biofeedback learning. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 4, 221-227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevin, J. A. (1973). The maintenance of behavior. In J. A. Nevin & G. S. Reynolds (Eds.), The study of behavior: Learning, motivation, emotion, and instinct (pp. 201-236). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. P. (1995). Definitions of biofeedback and applied psychophysiology. In M. S. Schwartz & Associates (Eds.), Biofeedback: A practitioner's guide (pp. 27-31). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S. (1995). Headache: Selected issues and considerations in evaluation and treatment. In M. S. Schwartz & Associates (Eds.), Biofeedback: A practitioner's guide (pp. 354-407). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S., & Associates (Eds.). (1995). Biofeedback: A practitioner's guide. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S., & Kelly, M. F. (1995). Raynaud's disease: Selected issues and considerations in using biofeedback therapies. In M. S. Schwartz & Associates (Eds.), Biofeedback: A practitioner's guide (pp. 429-444). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S., & Olson, R. P. (1995). A historical perspective on the field of biofeedback and applied psychophysiology. In M. S. Schwartz & Associates (Eds.), Biofeedback: A practitioner's guide (pp. 3-18). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeiler, M. (1977). Schedules of reinforcement: The controlling variables. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 201-232). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cohen, S.L., Richardson, J., Klebez, J. et al. EMG Biofeedback: The Effects of CRF, FR, VR, FI, and VI Schedules of Reinforcement on the Acquisition and Extinction of Increases in Forearm Muscle Tension. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 26, 179–194 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011325519568

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011325519568

Navigation