Skip to main content
Log in

The Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire: Confirmatory Factor Analysis

  • Published:
Pastoral Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Within contemporary psychology there is increasing interest in the role of religion on behaviour and psychological functioning. Such interest can be attested to by the growth in the number of pertinent books and articles that have been published and also the development of new self-report measures of religiosity. The Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire is one such recently developed measure. It is a brief self-report measure comprising 10 items that were designed to measure strength of religious faith regardless of religious denomination or affiliation. Although Plante and Boccaccini (1997a, 1997b) have provided some preliminary evidence for the reliability and validity of the scale, the factor structure of the scale has not yet been examined. The aim of the present paper was to confirm the factor structure of the scale. The hypothesised one-factor model was tested using confirmatory factor analytic methods. Data from a sample of 106 Northern Irish undergraduate university students were examined using confirmatory factor analytic methods. A one-factor model was tested and accepted on the basis of fit statistics, therefore supporting the hypothesised unidimensional structure of the scale. The present results provide further evidence that the Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire is psychometrically sound and therefore it can be recommended for further use by researchers interested in the construct of strength of religious faith.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Batson, C. D., & Ventis, W. L. (1982). The religious experience: A social-psychological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendig, A. W. (1954). Age, sex, and the Manifest Anxiety Scale test. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 18, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrenberg, J. L. (1987). The Belief in Personal Control Scale: A measure of God-mediated and exaggerated control. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51, 194–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhugra, D. (1996). Psychiatry and religion: Context, consensus and controversies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutrona, C. D., & Russell, D. W. (1987). The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress. In W. H. Jones & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships, Vol 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 37–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. R. (1977). SCL-90–R Manual-I. Baltimore: Clinical Psychometric Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabo, T., & Belk, S. S. (1985). A short scale to measure self-righteousness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 72–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. I., & Venable, G. D. (1983). Development of an 'age-universal' I-E revised scale. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 22, 181–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, D., & Witztum, E. (1994). Special section on psychiatry and religion. Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences, 31, 143–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. C., & Hood, R. W. Jr. (1999). Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, Al.: Religious Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoge, D. R. (1972). A validated intrinsic religious motivation scale. Journal for the Scientific Study for Religion, 11, 369–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M., & Fulford, K. W. M. (1997). Spiritual experience and psychopathology. Philosophy, Psychology and Psychiatry, 4, 41–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1999a). PRELIS 2.30. Chicago: Scientific Software Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1999b). LISREL 8.30. Chicago: Scientific Software Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, H. G. (1998). Handbook of religion and mental health. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, H., Pakerson, G. R., & Meador, K. G. (1997). Religious index for psychiatric research. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 885–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenthal, K. M. (1995). Mental health and religion. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plante, T. G., & Boccaccini, M. T. (1997a). The Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire. Pastoral Psychology, 45, 375–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plante, T. G., & Boccaccini, M. T. (1997b). Reliability and validity of the Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire. Pastoral Psychology, 45, 429–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plante, T. G., Yancey, S., Sherman, A., Guertin, M., & Partdini, D. (1999). Further validation for the Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire. Pastoral Psychology, 48, 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumaker, J. F. (1992). Religion and mental health.New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafranske, E. P. (1996). Religion and the clinical practice of psychology. Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 25, 173–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Synder, C. R. (1995). Conceptualizing, measuring, and nurturing hope. Journal of Counseling and Development, 73, 355–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, D. A. (1991). Social-emotional adjustment in older children and adults: I. Psychometric properties of the Weinberger Adjustment Inventory. Unpublished Manuscript, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewis, C.A., Shevlin, M., McGuckin, C. et al. The Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire: Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Pastoral Psychology 49, 379–384 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010370728546

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010370728546

Navigation