Abstract
Since children are considered incapable ofgiving informed consent to participate inresearch, regulations require that bothparental permission and the assent of thepotential child subject be obtained. Assent andpermission are uniquely bound together, eachserving a different purpose. Parentalpermission protects the child from assumingunreasonable risks. Assent demonstrates respectfor the child and his developing autonomy. Inorder to give meaningful assent, the child mustunderstand that procedures will be performed,voluntarily choose to undergo the procedures,and communicate this choice. Understanding theelements of informed consent has been theparadigm for assessing capacity to give assent.This method leaves the youngest, leastcognitively mature children vulnerable towaiver of assent and forced researchparticipation. Voluntariness can also becompromised by the influence of authorityfigures who can exert undue influence andcoerce children to participate in research. This paper discusses factors that may influencethe decision to give assent/permission,potential parent-child conflict in theassent/permission process and how it isresolved, and potential parental undueinfluence on research participation. Theseissues are illustrated with quotations drawnfrom a larger qualitative study of parentalpermission and child assent (data notpresented). We suggest a developmentalapproach, viewing assent as a continuum rangingfrom mere affirmation in the youngest childrento the equivalent of the informed consentprocess in the mature adolescent.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Abramovitch, R., Freedman, J.L., Henry, K., Van Brunschot, M. “Children's Capacity to Agree to Psychological Research: Knowledge of Risks and Benefits and Voluntariness.” Ethics and Behavior 5 (1995): 25–48.
Additional Safeguards for Children in Clinical Investigations. Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, Pt. 50. Subpt. D, 2002.
Additional DHHS Protections for Children Involved as Subjects in Research. Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 Pt. 46 Subpt. D, 1991.
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs. Guidelines for the ethical conduct of studies to evaluate drugs in pediatric population. Pediatrics 95 (1995): 286–294.
Arnett, J. “The Young and the Reckless: Adolescent Reckless Behavior.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 4 (1995): 67–71.
Bartholome, W. “Ethical Issues in Pediatric Research.” In: Vanderpool HY, ed. The Ethics of Research Involving Human Subjects. Frederick, MD: University Publishing Group, 1996, pp. 360–361.
Broome, M.E. “Consent (Assent) for Research with Pediatric Patients.” Seminars in Oncology Nursing 15 (1999): 96–103.
Broome, M.E., Richards, D.J., Hall, J.M. “Children in Research: The Experience of Ill Children and Adolescents.” Journal of Family Nursing 7 (2001): 32–49.
Denham, J.E., Nelson, R.M. “Self-determination is not an Appropriate Model for Understanding Parental Permission and Child Assent.” Anesthesia and Analgesia 94 (2002): 1–3.
Dorn, L.D., Susman, E.J., Fletcher, J.C. “Informed Consent in Children and Adolescents: Age, Maturation and Psychological State.” Journal of Adolescent Health 16 (1995): 185–190.
Erb, T.O., Schulman, S.R., Sugarman, J. “Permission and Assent for Clinical Research in Pediatric Anesthesia.” Anesthesia and Analgesia 94 (2002): 1155–1160.
Jessor, R. “Risk Behavior in Adolescence: A Psycholsocial Framework for Understanding and Action.” Developmental Review 12 (1992): 374–390.
Leikin, S. “Minors' Assent, Consent, or Dissent to Medical Research.” IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research 15 (1993): 1–7.
Lewis, C.C. “How Adolescents Approach Decisions: Changes Over Grades Seven to Twelve and Policy Implications.” Child Development 52 (1981): 538–544.
The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Report and Recommendations: Research Involving Children. Washington: Government Printing Office, 1977.
The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Research Involving Those Institutionalized as Mentally Infirm. Washington: Government Printing Office, 1978.
The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington: Government Printing Office, 1979.
Nelson, R.M., Reynolds, W.W. “Child Assent and Parental Permission: A Comment on Tait's 'Do They Understand?' ” Anesthesiology 98 (2003): 597–598.
Ondrusek, N., Abramovitch, R., Paencharz, P., Koren, G. “Empirical Examination of the Ability of Children to Consent to Clinical Research.” Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (1998): 58–65.
Rosato, J. “The Ethics of Clinical Trials: A Child's View.” Journal of Law and Medicine and Ethics 28 (Winter 2000): 362–378.
Scherer, D.G. “The Capacities of Minors to Exercise Voluntariness in Medical Treatment Decisions.” Law and Human Behavior 15 (1991): 431–449.
Susman, E.J., Dorn, L.D., Fletcher, J.C. “Participation in Biomedical Research: The Consent Process as Viewed by Children, Adolescents, Young Adults, and Physicians.” Journal of Pediatrics 121 (1992): 547–552.
Tait, A.R., Voepel-Lewis, T., Malviya, S. “ 'Do They Understand?' Part II Assent of Children Participating in Clinical Anesthesia and Surgery Research.” Anesthesiology 98 (2003): 609–614.
Weithorn, L.A., Campbell, S.B. “The Competency of Children and Adolescents to Make Informed Treatment Decisions.” Child Development 53 (1982): 1589–1598.
Zinner, S.E. “The Elusive Goal of Informed Consent by Adolescents.” Theoretical Medicine 16 (1995): 323–331.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rossi, W.C., Reynolds, W. & Nelson, R.M. Child Assent and Parental Permission in Pediatric Research. Theor Med Bioeth 24, 131–148 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024690712019
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024690712019