Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using Perceived Health to Test the Construct-related Validity of Global Quality of Life

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quality of life (QOL) is considered as aglobal, yet unidimensional, subjectiveassessment of one's satisfaction with life. Weexamine the construct validity of the availableindicators of global QOL by constructing acausal model in which QOL is viewed as causallyresponding to several dimensions of perceivedhealth. Global QOL is measured with fiveindicators derived from the literature, andperceived health is measured by eightdimensions of the SF-36 Health Survey. Thestructural equation model describes the QOL andperceived health assessments of 306 coronaryartery bypass graft (CABG) patients andprovides a stringent test of theunidimensionality of the global QOL indicators.The evidence regarding QOL is worrisome, butnot devastating. The acceptable model fit wasachieved by introducing direct effects leadingfrom the General Health Perceptions concept totwo of the five indicators of global QOL. Thissuggests that there are some mechanisms thatinfluence these indicators without firstaltering QOL, or that these indicators are notresponding in unison to QOL. Furthermore, theFaces QOL indicator required measurement errorcorrelations to two of the perceived healthindicators. This also suggests that there aremechanisms beyond pure QOL that act upon thisindicator. But the problematic effects anderror correlations are modest, so the evidenceagainst these indicators is not particularlystrong. Overall, the Self-Anchoring StrivingScale (SASS) indicator and the Life-as-a -Wholeindicator (from Multiple Discrepancies Theory)seem to be the cleanest indicators of globalQOL. General health perceptions and perceivedmental health both influenced global QOL, whilethe other six health perception concepts had noconsistent impact on global QOL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Andrews, F.M. and S.B. Withey: 1976, Social indicators of well-being:American' perceptions of life quality (Platenum Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckie, T. and L. Hayduk: 1997, 'Measuring quality of life', Social Indicators Research 42, pp. 21-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, A.: 1991, Measuring health: a review of quality of life measurement scales (Open University Press, Philadelphia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, A.: 1995, 'What things are important in people's lives? A survey of the public's judgements to inform scales of health related quality of life', Social Science in Medicine 41(10), pp. 1447-1462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., P. Converse and W. Rodgers: 1976, The quality of American life (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantril, H.: 1965, The pattern of human concerns (Rutgers University Press, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, S., A. C. O'Donoghue, W. J. McKenna and A. Steptoe: 1997, 'Health related quality of life and psychological wellbeing in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy', Heart 78, pp. 182-187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, L. and J. Algina: 1986, Introduction to classical and modern test theory (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Forth Worth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. and E. Suh: 1997, 'Measuring quality of life: economic, social, and subjective indicators', Social Indicators Research 40, pp. 189-216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebersole, P.: 1995, 'Quality of life: what is it?', Geriatric Nursing 16(2), pp. 49-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, A.: 1995, Quality of life measurements in the evaluation of treatment: proposed guidelines', British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 39(3), pp. 217-222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, T. and A. Feinstein: 1994, 'A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements', Journal of the American Medical Association 272(8), pp. 619-626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grady, K. L., A. Jalowiec, C. White-Williams, R. Pifarre, J. Kirklin, R. Bourge and M. Costanzo: 1995, 'Predictors of quality of life in patients with advanced heart failure awaiting transplantation', Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 14, pp. 2-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyatt, G.: 1993, 'Measurement of health-related quality of life in heart failure', Journal of the American College of Cardiology 22(4) (Suppl A), pp. 185A-191A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayduk, L.: 1987, Structural equation modeling with LISREL: essentials and advances (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayduk, L.: 1996, LISREL issues, debates, and strategies (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. G. and D. Sorbom: 1988, LISREL 7: a guide to the program and applications (SPSS, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. M. and J. P. Anderson, 1990, 'The general health policy model: an integrated approach', in B. Spilker (ed.), Quality of Life Assessments in Clinical Trials (Ravin Press, New York), pp. 131-149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, S. D., M. S. Bayliss, J. E. Ware, M. Hsu, A. M. Damiano and T. F. Goss: 1997, 'Comparison of responses to SF-36 health survey questions with one-week and four-week recall periods', HSR: Health Services Research 32(3), pp. 367-384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinney, M.: 1995, 'Quality of life research: rigor or rigor mortis', Cardiovascular Nursing 31(4), pp. 25-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHorney, C. A., J. E, Ware, J. F. Lu and C. D. Sherbourne: 1995, 'The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups', Medical Care 32(1), pp. 40-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medical Research Council of Canada: 1987, Guidelines on research involving human subjects (Minister of Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C.: 1991, Global report on student well-being: volume 1: life satisfaction and happiness (Springer-Verlag, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Palys, T. S. and B. R. Little, 1980, 'Social indicators and the quality of life', Canadian Pyschologist 21, pp. 67-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, D. L. and P. Erikson: 1993, Health status and health policy: quality of life in health care evaluation and resource allocation (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J.: 1995, 'Quality of life research: its increasing importance'. Nursing Science Quarterly 8(3), pp. 100-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J. E., M. Kosinski and S. D. Keller: 1994, SF-36 physical and mental component summary measures: a user's manual (The Health Institute, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J. E., K. K. Snow, M. Kosinski and B. Gandek: 1993, SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide (New England Medical Center, The Health Institute, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida

    Theresa M. Beckie

  2. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta

    Leslie A. Hayduk

Authors
  1. Theresa M. Beckie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leslie A. Hayduk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beckie, T.M., Hayduk, L.A. Using Perceived Health to Test the Construct-related Validity of Global Quality of Life. Social Indicators Research 65, 279–298 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOCI.0000003800.31366.73

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOCI.0000003800.31366.73

Keywords

Search

Navigation