Skip to main content
Log in

Peer Social Structure and Risk-Taking Behaviors Among African American Early Adolescents

  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated associations between peer status, peer group social influences, and risk-taking behaviors in an urban sample of 647 African American seventh-grade students. The highest rates of problem behaviors were seen in the controversial peer status group, or those youth who were both highly liked and highly disliked by other youth. Findings also revealed contrasting patterns of peer group leadership. The more conventional, positive leadership style predicted lower rates, and the less mainstream, unconventional style predicted higher rates of involvement in problem behaviors. Conventional leaders were most likely to be popular status youth, while unconventional leaders were mostly to be both controversial and popular status youth. Controversial status youth were also more likely to be involved in deviant peer groups. Results highlight the importance of controversial status students as key influence agents during early adolescence. We discuss the implications of these results for preventive interventions to reduce adolescent problem behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adler, P. A., and Adler, P. (1998). Peer Power: Preadolescent Culture and Identity. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagwell, C. L., Coie, J. D., Terry, R. A., and Lochman, J. E. (2000). Peer clique participation and social status in preadolescence. Merrill-Palmer Q. 45: 280–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierman, K. L., Smoot, D. L., and Aumiller, K. (1993). Characteristics of aggressive-rejected, aggressive (nonrejected), and rejected (nonaggressive) boys. Child Dev. 64: 139–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierman, K. L., and Wargo, J. B. (1995). Predicting the longitudinal course associated with aggressive-rejected, aggressive (nonrejected), and rejected (nonaggressive) status. Dev. Psychopathol. 7: 669–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, L. M., Allison, K. W., and Obeidallah, D. (1995). Social context and adolescence: Perspectives on development among inner-city African American teens. In Crockett, L. J., and Crouter, A. C. (eds.), Pathways Through Adolescence. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catania, J. A., Gibson, D. R., Chitwood, D. D., and Coates, T. J. (1990). Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: Influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior. Psychol. Bull. 108: 339–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control (1990). Youth Risk Behavior Survey Surveillance System. 1990 National School Based Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J. D., and Dodge, K. A. (1983). Continuities and changes in children's sociometric status: A five-year longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Q. 29: 261–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J. D., Lochman, J. E., Terry, R., and Hyman, C. (1992). Predicting early adolescent disorder from childhood aggression and peer rejection. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 60: 783–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J. D., and Jacobs, M. R. (1993). The role of social context in the prevention of conduct disorder. Dev. Psychopathol. 5: 263–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J., Terry, R., Lenox, K., Lochman, J., and Hyman, C. (1995a). Childhood peer rejection and aggression as predictors of stable patterns of adolescent disorder. Dev. Psychopathol. 7: 697–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J. D., Terry, R., Zakriski, A., and Lochman, J. E. (1995b). Early adolescent social influences on delinquent behavior. In McCord, J. (ed.), Coercion and Punishment in Long-Term Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 229–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J. D., and Miller-Johnson, S. (2001). Peer factors in early offending behavior. In Loeber, R., and Farrington, D. P. (eds.), Child Delinquents. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 191–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A. (1993). Social-cognitive mechanisms in the development of conduct disorder and depression. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 44: 559–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder, D., Evans, C. C., and Parker, S. (1995). School Talk: Gender and Adolescent Culture. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C. A. (1994). Leadership in groups of school-age girls. Dev. Psychol. 30: 920–927.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, D. C., Conrad, J., and Turner, T. M. (1995). Adjustment of antisocial and nonantisocial rejected adolescents. Dev. Psychopathol. 7: 857–874.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymel, S., and Franke, S. (1985). Children's peer relations: Assessing self-perceptions. In Schneider, B. H., Rubin, K. H., and Ledingham, J. E. (eds.), Children's Peer Relations: Issues in Assessment and Intervention. Springer, New York, pp. 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupersmidt, J. B., and Coie, J. D. (1990). Preadolescent peer status, aggression, and school adjustment as predictors of externalizing problems in adolescence. Child Dev. 61: 1350–1362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthar, S. S. (1997). Sociodemographic disadvantage and psychosocial adjustment: Perspectives from developmental psychopathology. In Luthar, S. S., Burack, J. A., Cicchetti, D., and Weisz, J. R. (eds.), Development Psychopathology. Perspectives on Adjustment, Risk, and Disorder. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 459–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthar, S. S., and McMahon, T. J. (1996). Peer reputation among inner-city adolescents: Structure and correlates. J. Res. Adolesc. 6: 581–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller-Johnson, S., and Costanzo, P. (in press). If you can't beat 'em...have them join you: Peer-based interventions during adolescence. In Kupersmidt, J. B., and Dodge, K. A. (eds.), Children's Peer Relations: From Development to Intervention to Policy: A Festschrift in Honor of John D. Coie. Washington, DC. American Psychological Association

  • Moffitt, T. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychol. Rev. 100: 674–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M., and Pattee, L. (1993). Children's peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average status. Psychol. Bull. 113: 99–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkhurst, J. T., and Asher, S. R. (1992). Peer rejection in middle school: Subgroup differences in behavior, loneliness, and interpersonal concerns Dev. Psychol. 28: 231–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. R., and Bank, C. L. (1989). Some amplifying mechanisms for pathologic processes in families. In Gunnar, M., and Thelen, E. (eds.), Systems and Development: Symposia on Child Psychology. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 167–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, C. L., Williams, C. L., Veblen-Mortenson, S., and Toomey, T. L. (1996). Project Northland: Outcomes of a communitywide alcohol use prevention program during early adolescence. Am. J. Public Health 86: 956–965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, R. H., Gioci, M., Penner, W., and Trautlein, B. (1993). Webs of influence: School and community programs that enhance adolescent health and education. In Takanishi, R. (ed.), Adolescence in the 1990's. Risk and Opportunity. Teachers College Press, New York, pp. 29–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., and VanAcker, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Dev. Psychol. 36: 14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, K. D., and Asher, S. R. (2000). Adaptation and maldadaptation in the peer system. Developmental processes and outcomes. In Sameroff, A. J., Lewis, M., and Miller, S. Z. (eds.). Handbook of Developmental Psychopathology. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, pp. 157–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, M. E., Davis, C. S., and Koch, G. G. (1995). Categorical Data Analysis. Using the SAS System. SAS Publishers, Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry, R., and Coie J. D. (1991). A comparison of methods for defining sociometric status among children. Dev. Psychol. 27, 867–880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udry, J. R. (1994). Integrating biological and sociological models of adolescent problem behaviors. In Ketterlinus, R. D., and Lamb, M. (eds). Adolescent Problem Behaviors: Issues and Research. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 93–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urberg, K. A., Shyu, S., and Liang, J. (1990). Peer influence in adolescent cigarette smoking. Addict. Behav. 15: 247–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinhardt, L. S., Forsyth, A. D., Carey, M. P., Jaworski, B. C., and Durant, L. E. (1998). Reliability and validity of self-report measures of HIV-related sexual behavior: Progress since 1990 and recommendations for research and practice. Arch. Sex. Behav. 27: 155–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfield, L. F. (1995). The knowledge base on resilience in African American adolescents. In Crockett, L. J., and Crouter, A. C. (eds.), Pathways Through Adolescence. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 87–118.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shari Miller-Johnson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller-Johnson, S., Costanzo, P.R., Coie, J.D. et al. Peer Social Structure and Risk-Taking Behaviors Among African American Early Adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 32, 375–384 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024926132419

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024926132419

Navigation