Skip to main content
Log in

Illusory Control as a Function of Motivation for a Specific Outcome in a Chance-Based Situation

  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research has provided evidence that an individual's need for a chance-based outcome positively affects perceptions of the skill involved in attaining the outcome as well as certainty of winning. Two experiments were conducted to test several competing alternative interpretations for this effect. In Experiment 1, food-satiated (low-need) and food-deprived (high-need) subjects were given the opportunity to win a food incentive in a chance-based card-drawing game either in the presence or absence of situational cues previously shown to induce skill orientations. Skill and confidence-in-winning ratings were found to be positive function of outcome need regardless of the cues condition, thus not supporting an attentional or vigilance interpretation of the general effect. In Experiment 2, food-satiated and food-deprived subjects faced a similar card-drawing game, but this time were given the opportunity to choose whether or not they wanted to be personally involved in various facets of the game (e.g., shuffling the cards). As predicted, high-need subjects showed a greater propensity to want to be personally involved in playing the game, a finding offering support for a “control” interpretation. Overall results are discussed in terms of control theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1979). Judgements of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 441–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biner, P. M., Angle, S. T., Park, J. H., Mellinger, A. E., & Barber, B. C. (1995). Need state and the illusion of control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 899–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biner, P. M., & Hua, D. M. (1995). Determinants of the magnitude of goal valence: The interactive effects of need, instrumentality, and the difficulty of goal attainment. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouts, P., & Van Avermaet, E. (1992). Drawing familiar or unfamiliar cards: Stimulus familiarity, chance orientation, and the illusion of control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 331–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J. M. (1985). Desire for control and achievement-related behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1520–1533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J. M. (1986). Desire for control and the illusion of control: The effects of familiarity and sequence of outcomes. Journal of Research in Personality, 20, 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J. M., & Schnerring, D. A. (1982). The effects of desire for control and extrinsic rewards on the illusion of control and gambling. Motivation and Emotion, 6, 329–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunkling, L., & Gosling, W. (1984). The facts on file dictionary of first names. New York: Facts on File Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, D. S., & Wilson, T. D. (1990). When the stakes are high: A limit to the illusion-of-control effect. Social Cognition, 8, 305–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykstra, S. P., & Dollinger, S. J. (1990). Model competence, depression, and the illusion of control. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 235–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J. H., & Darley, J. M. (1990). The purposeful-action sequence and the illusion of control: The effects of foreknowledge and target involvement on observers' judgments of others' control over random events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 346–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, N., Keinan, G., & Regev, Y. (1992). Controlling the uncontrollable: Effects of stress on illusory perceptions of controllability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 923–931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T., & Douglas, C. (1986). Biased evaluations of randomly determined gambling outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 228–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M., & Kinney, R. F. (1989). Effects of deliberative and implemental mind-sets on the illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 531–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D. (1990). The cognitive psychology of gambling. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 6, 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, F. W. (1953). Stated expectations as functions of probability and desirability of outcomes. Journal of Personality, 21, 329–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunette & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 75–170). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J., & Roth, J. (1975). Heads I win, tails it's chance: The illusion of control as a function of the sequence of outcomes in a purely chance task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 951–955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, R. W. (1951). The effect of probability, desirability, and “privilege” on the stated expectations of children. Journal of Personality, 19, 332–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. R. (1982a). Expectancy-value models in organizational psychology. In N. T. Feather (Ed.), Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology (pp. 293–312). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. R. (1982b). Motivation: New directions for theory, research, and practice. Academy of Management Review, 7, 80–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinder, C. C. (1991). Valence-instrumentality-expectancy theory. In R. M. Steers & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Motivation and work behavior (pp. 144–164). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, D. G., & Hoge, R. D. (1965). Strength of the relationship between the value of an event and its subjective probability as a function of method of measurement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 483–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, M., & Harrell, A. (1981). Modeling effort decisions with behavioral decision theory: Toward an individual difference model of expectancy theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27, 303–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanous, J. P., Keon, T. L., & Latack, J. C. (1983). Expectancy theory and occupational/organizational choices: A review and test. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 66–86.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul M. Biner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biner, P.M., Huffman, M.L., Curran, M.A. et al. Illusory Control as a Function of Motivation for a Specific Outcome in a Chance-Based Situation. Motivation and Emotion 22, 277–291 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021300306318

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021300306318

Keywords

Navigation