Skip to main content
Log in

Bone cement or bone substitute augmentation of pedicle screws improves pullout strength in posterior spinal fixation

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pedicle screws are widely used to fix posterior spinal implants. However, in some situations, such as at the ends of long constructs in scoliosis correction, the screws may pull out of the pedicles. This limits the use of pedicle screw fixation where bone quality is poor. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of using either a low-viscosity bone cement (Palacos LV) or a bone augmentation material (Cortoss) on the pullout strength of typical pedicle screws (5 mm USS Schanz screws). Ten lumbar calf vertebrae were implanted with pedicle screws. One screw was inserted as normal, and the contralateral screw was augmented with Palacos LV or Cortoss. A plate was then cemented to the posterior surface of each pedicle and the screws were pulled out using a tensile testing machine. The pullout strength of the non-augmented screws was 1203±260 N, while the pullout strength of the augmented screws was 1970±220 N (Palacos LV) and 2021±342 N (Cortoss). Both Palacos LV and Cortoss significantly increased the pullout strength (p=0.0213 and p=0.0029, respectively). There was no significant difference between the Palacos LV and Cortoss groups (p=0.79).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Hackenberg, T. Link and U. Liljenqvist, Spine 27(9) (2002) 937.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. N. Weinstein, B. L. Rydevik and W. Rauschning, Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 284 (1992) 34.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. S. Sarzier, A. J. Evans and D. W. Cahill, J. Neurosurg. 96(Suppl. 3) (2002) 309.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Bai, F. J. Kummer and J. Spivak, Spine 26(24) (2001) 2679.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. H. Wittenberg, K. S. Lee, M. Shea, A. A. White III and W. C. Hayes, Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 296 (1993) 278.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. A. Wilkes, J. G. Mackinnon and W. G. Thomas, J. Bone Joint. Surg. Br. V. 76B(1) (1994) 155.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. C. Moore, E. P. Frankenburg, J. A. Goulet and S. A. Goldstein, J. Orthop. Trauma 11(8) (1997) 577.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. M. Keaveny and W. C. Hayes, Trans. ASME: J. Biomech. Eng. 115 (1993) 534.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evans, S.L., Hunt, C.M. & Ahuja, S. Bone cement or bone substitute augmentation of pedicle screws improves pullout strength in posterior spinal fixation. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 13, 1143–1145 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021133819646

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021133819646

Keywords

Navigation