Skip to main content
Log in

Action Research in Management—Ethical Dilemmas

  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the application of the guiding ethical principles for the conduct of research involving human subjects in an action research project in a membership-based community psychiatric disability organization. Action research is a collaborative process of critical inquiry between the researcher and the people in the situation, in this case the management executive. The relationship between the researcher and manager participants in a long-term action research project gives rise to ethical dilemmas related to participant selection and voluntary participation, informed consent, decision making, anonymity and confidentiality, conflicting and different needs. The process and strategies implemented to address them are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Argyris, C., Putman, R., and McLain Smith, D. (1985). Action Science: Concepts, Methods, and Skills for Research and Intervention, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1991). From framework through experience to learning: The essential nature of action research. In Nissen, H., Klien, H., and Hirschheim, R. (eds.), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1982). Thought and Wisdom, Intersystems Publications, Seaside, CA, pp. 1-10, 116-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia (1999). National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D. R., and Emory, C. W. (1995). Business Research Methods, Irwin, Chicargo.

  • Ellis, J. H. M., and Kiely, J. A. (2000). Action inquiry strategies: Taking stock and moving forward. J. Appl. Manage. Stud. 9(1), 83-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairhaven, A. P. L. (1998). Schizophrenia Fellowship of Victoria-Organizational Review, Schizophrenia Fellowship of Victoria, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. (1990). Liberating Systems Theory, Plenum, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. (1995). Solving Problem Solving: A Potent Force for Effective Management, Wiley, Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. (1999). Rethinking the Fifth Discipline: Learning Within the Unknowable, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. (2001). The relationship of ‘systems thinking’ to action research. In Reason, P., and Bradbury, H. (eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, Sage, London, pp. 133-155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Carson, E. R. (1993). Dealing With Complexity: An Introduction to Theory and Application of System Science, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (1991a). Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention, Wiley, Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (1991b). Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings, Wiley, Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Group (2000a). Notes on meeting with executive managers, May 22, 2000. B. C. Walker. Melbourne.

  • Group (2000b). Notes on meeting with executive managers, May 8, 2000. B. C. Walker. Melbourne.

  • Lincoln, Y. S. (2001). Engaging sympathies: Relationships between action research and social constructivism. In Reason, P., and Bradbury, H. (eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, Sage, London, pp. 124-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshak, R. J. (1993). Lewin meets Confucius: A review of the OD model of change. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 29(4), 393-415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakkula, M. J., and Ravitch, S. M. (1998). Matters of Interpretation: Reciprocal Transformation in Therapeutic and Developmental Relationships With Youth, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, S. L. (2000). Challenges for research ethics and moral knowledge construction in the applied social sciences. J. Bus. Eth. 26, 302-318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plane, J. P. (2000). The ethnomethodological approach of management: A new perspective in constructivist research. J. Bus. Eth. 26, 233-243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., and Bradbury, H. (eds.) (2001). Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (2001). Clinical inquiry/research. In Reason, P., and Bradbury, H. (eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, Sage, London, pp. 228-237.

    Google Scholar 

  • SFV (2000). SFV: Strategic Framework, SFV, Melbourne, pp. 1-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieber, J. E. (1992). Planning Ethically Responsible Research: A Guide for Students and Internal Review Boards, Sage, Newbury Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1995). How Are We to Live?: Ethics in an Age of Self Interest, Reed Book, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant Observation, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, E. T. (1996). Action Research: A Handbook for Practitioners, Sage, Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B. C. (2000). Impact of a strategic change in a membership organization: Explanatory statement. Melbourne 1-2.

  • Wells, V. J. (1994). Ethics in business management research. In Wass, V. J., and Wells, W. P. E. (eds.), Principles and Practice in Business Management Research, Aldershot, Hants, England. pp. 277-297.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walker, B., Haslett, T. Action Research in Management—Ethical Dilemmas. Systemic Practice and Action Research 15, 523–533 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021016821198

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021016821198

Navigation