Skip to main content
Log in

Polarization in Abortion Attitudes in U.S. Religious Traditions, 1972–1998

  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

Studies have shown that attitudes toward abortion are polarizing. Yet, these studies have not focused upon what is often assumed to be the cause of polarization—religion. In this paper I find that polarization has increased between mainline and evangelical Protestants, as well as between black Protestants and both Catholics and white evangelicals. Moreover, I find that mainline Protestants and Catholics are internally polarizing. Finally, while I cannot determine the cause of the internal polarization of Catholics, the polarization within mainline Protestantism is caused by demographic changes. For white evangelicals, demographic changes have restrained polarization that would otherwise have occurred.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Brint, Steven 1994 In an Age of Experts: The Changing Role of Professionals in Politics and Public Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, Gene 1992 The Frontiers of Catholicism: The Politics of Ideology in a Liberal World. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, Clifford C., and Darwin O. Sawyer 1981 “A comparison of alternative models for analyzing the scalability of response patterns.” Sociological Methodology 12:240-280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Nancy J., and Robert V. Robinson 1996 “Are rumors of war exaggerated? Religious orthodoxy and moral progressivism in America.” American Journal of Sociology 102(3):756-776.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul, John Evans, and Bethany Bryson 1996 “Have Americans' social attitudes become more polarized?” American Journal of Sociology 102:690-755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, Otis Dudley, Douglas M. Sloane, and Charles Brody 1982 “Latent classes inferred from response-consistency effects.” In K. G. Joreskog and H. Wold (eds.), Systems Under Indirect Observation: Causality, Structure, Prediction: 18-64. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Lee, and Joseph F. Kobylka 1992 The Supreme Court and Legal Change. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, John H. 1997a “Multi-organizational fields and social movement organization frame content: The religious pro-choice movement.” Sociological Inquiry 67(4):451-469.

    Google Scholar 

  • 11997b “Worldviews or social groups as the source of moral value attitudes: Implications for the culture wars thesis.” Sociological Forum 12(3):371-404.

  • Evans, John H., Bethany Bryson, and Paul DiMaggio 2001 “Opinion polarization: Important contributions, necessary limitations.” American Journal of Sociology 106(4):944-959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, Roger, and Patricia Wittberg 2000 “Organizational revival from within: Explaining revivalism and reform in the Roman Catholic Church.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 39(2):154-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, David A., Christopher G. Ellison, and Daniel A. Powers 1996 “In search of denominational subcultures: Religious affiliation and ‘pro-family’ issues revisited.” Review of Religious Research 38:3-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, David, and John Lynxwiler 1999 “The impact of religiosity on race variations in abortion attitudes.” Sociological Spectrum 19:359-377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, Michael W., Elisabeth M. Ten Vergert, and Johannes Kingma 1987 “Using Mokken scale analysis to develop unidimensional scales: Dothe six abortion items in the NORCGSS form one or two scales?” Quality and Quantity 21:393-408.

    Google Scholar 

  • 11988 “Secular trends in abortion attitudes: 1975–1980–1985.” The Journal of Psychology 122(4):323-341.

  • Hoffmann, John P., and Alan S. Miller 1997 “Social and political attitudes among religious groups: Convergence and divergence over time.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 36(1):52-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • 11998 “Denominational influences on socially divisive issues.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 37(3):528-546.

  • Hunter, James D. 1991 Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • 11994 Before the Shooting Begins: Searching for Democracy in America's Culture War. New York: Free Press.

  • Iannaccone, Laurence R. 1994 “Why strict churches are strong.” American Journal of Sociology 99(5):1180-1211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, Dean M. 1972 Why Conservative Churches are Growing. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenski, Gerhard 1958 The Religious Factor. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manza, Jeff, and Clem Brooks 1997 “The religious factor in U.S. presidential elections, 1960–1992.” American Journal of Sociology 103(1):38-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouw, Ted, and Michael E. Sobel 2001 “Culture wars and opinion polarization: The case of abortion.” American Journal of Sociology 106(4):913-943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthen, Bengt 1982 “Some categorical response models with continuous latent variables.” In K. G. Joreskog and H. Wold (eds.), Systems Under Indirect Observation: Causality, Structure, Prediction: 65-80. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Charles W. 1990 Time Series Analysis: Regression Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro 1992 The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalzbauer, John 1993 “Evangelicals in the new class: Class versus subcultural predictors of ideology.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 32(4):330-342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Robert Y., and Harpreet Mahajan 1986 “Gender differences in policy preferences: A summary of trends from the 1960s to the 1980s.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50:42-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, David A., Rochford, E. Burke, Worden, Steven K., and Benford, Robert D. 1986 “Frame alignment processes, micro-mobilization, and movement participation.” American Sociological Review 51:464-481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steensland, Brian, Park, Jerry Z., Regnerus, Mark D., Robinson, Lynn D., Wilcox W. Bradford, and Woodberry, Robert D. 2000 “The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art.” Social Forces 79(1):291-318.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. House of Representatives 1976 Proposed Constitutional Amendments on Abortion. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, R. Stephen 1993 “Work in progress toward a new paradigm for the sociological study of religion in the United States.” American Journal of Sociology 98(5):1044-1093.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Rhys H. 1997 Cultural Wars in American Politics: Critical Reviews of a Popular Thesis. Hawthorn, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winship, Christopher, and Robert D. Mare 1984 “Regression models with ordinal variables.” American Sociological Review 49:512-525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, Robert 1988 The Restructuring of American Religion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evans, J.H. Polarization in Abortion Attitudes in U.S. Religious Traditions, 1972–1998. Sociological Forum 17, 397–422 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019627006778

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019627006778

Navigation