Skip to main content
Log in

Physician benchmarking: measuring variation in practice behavior in treatment of otitis media

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study uses Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to analyze physician practice behavior and develops measures of physician practice efficiency as a basis for improving productivity and reducing costs in otitis media treatment. Other objectives include determining geographic variations in practice patterns for otitis media, and the impact of inefficient practice patterns on the cost of treatment of otitis media. Only 46 (28.8%) of the 160 physicians were classified as efficient. Average total cost of an episode by efficient providers was $357.03 and $492.06 for inefficient providers. By restricting particular inputs and outputs, and directing all physicians to treat otitis media through a balanced primary care model, physicians would be able to provide the same quality care at an average savings of 23.7% per efficient and 4.4% per inefficient provider.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AHCPR, Clinical practice guidelines, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, US department of Health and Human Services Publication No. 93-0059 (1993).

  2. AHCPR, Clinical Practice Guideline No. 12: Otitis Media with effusion in young children, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, US department of Health and Human Services Publication No. 94-0622 (1994).

  3. American Medical Association, Physicians' Current Procedural Terminology, Chicago, IL (1995).

  4. N.C. Bailey, How to control overcharging by physicians, Business and Health (August, 1990) 13-18.

  5. R.H. Brook et al., Geographical variations in the use of services: do they have any clinical significance?, Health Affairs 3(2) (1984) 63-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Byrnes and V. Valdmanis, Analyzing technical and allocative efficiency of hospitals, in: Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Application,eds. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, A. Lewin and L. Seiford (Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.M. Carlisle, R.B. Valdez, M.F. Shapiro and R.H. Brook, Geographical variation in rates of selected surgical procedures within Los Angeles County, Health Services Research 30(1) (1995) 27-42.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G.M. Carter, J.P. Newhouse and D.A. Relles, How much change in the case mix index is DRG creep, Journal of Health Economics 9 (1990) 411-428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research 2(6) (1978) 429-444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M.R. Chassin et al., Variations in the use of medical and surgical services by the Medicare population, New England Journal of Medicine 314 (1986) 285-290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M.R. Chassin et al., Does inappropriate use explain geographic variations in the use of health care services? A study of three procedures, Journal of American Medical Association 258 (1987) 2533-2537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Chilingerian and D.H. Sherman, Managing physician efficiency and effectiveness in providing hospital services, Health Services Management Research 3(1) (1990) 3-15.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Chilingerian, Exploring why some physicians' hospital practices are more efficient, in: Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Application,eds. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, A. Lewin and L. Seiford (Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Federal Register (January 13, 1994) 59(9) 158.

  15. J.A. Ganley and J.S. Cubbin, Programme-efficiency implications of data envelopment analysis, ch. 5, in: Public Sector Efficiency Measurement: Applications of Data Envelopment Analysis (North-Holland, New York, 1992).

  16. S. Grosskopf and V. Valdmanis, Measuring hospital performance. A non-parametric approach, Journal of Health Economics 6 (1987) 89-107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Holahan, R.A. Berenson and P.G. Kachavos, Area variations in selected Medicare procedures, Health Affairs 9(4) (1990) 166-175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. D.C. Hsia, C.A. Ahern, B.P. Ritchie, L.M. Moscoe and W.M. Krushat, Medicare reimbursement accuracy under the prospective payment system, 1985 to 1988, Journal of the American Medical Association 268(7) (1992) 896-899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J.C. Javitt, A.M. McBean, S.S. Sastry and F. DiPaolo, Accuracy of coding in Medicare part B claims, Archives of Ophthalmology 111(5) (1993) 605-607.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.B. Mitchell, Area variation in Medicare physician spending, Health Affairs 11(I) (1992) 224-234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Y.A. Ozcan and J.R. Lynch, Rural hospital closures: An inquiry into efficiency, in: Advances in Health Economics and Health Services Research, eds. R. Scheffler and L.F. Rossiter 13 (1992) pp. 205-224.

  22. Y.A. Ozcan, R.D. Luke and C. Haksever, Ownership and organizational performance: A comparison of technical efficiency across hospital types, Medical Care 30(9) (1992) 781-794.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Y.A. Ozcan and R.D. Luke, A national study of the efficiency of hospitals in urban markets, Health Services Research 28(6) (1993) 719-739.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Y.A. Ozcan, Sensitivity analysis of hospital efficiency under alternative output/input and peer groups: A review, Knowledge and Policy 5(4) (1993) 1-29.

    Google Scholar 

  25. F. Pedraja-Chaparro, J. Salinas-Jimenez and P. Smith, On the role of weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis, Journal of Productivity Analysis 8(2) (1997) 215-230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schappert, National Center for Health Statistics Report (1992).

  27. N. Schlackman, Evaluation of the quality based compensation model: The third generation, American College of Medical Quality 8(2) (1993) 103-110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. H.D. Sherman, Hospital efficiency measurement and evaluation: Empirical test of a new technique, Medical Care 22(10) (1984) 922- 938.

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. Shwartz, L.I. Iezzoni, A.S. Ash, S.M.C. Payne and J.D. Restuccia, Health care databases, diagnostic coding, severity adjustment systems and improved parameter estimation, Annals of Operations Research 67 (1996) 23-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. S. Siwolop, Doctored fees, Financial World 158(16) (1989) 64-65.

    Google Scholar 

  31. J.E. Wennberg and A.M. Gittelsohn, Small area variations in health care delivery, Science 182 (1973) 1102-1108.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J.E. Wennberg and A.M. Gittelsohn, Variations in medical care among small areas, Scientific American 254(4) (1982) 120-134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. J.E. Wennberg, Dealing with medical practice variations: a proposal for action, Health Affairs 3(2) (1984) 6-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. J.E. Wennberg, J.L. Freeman and W.J. Culp, Are hospital services rationed in New Haven or over-utilized in Boston?, Lancet 1(1) (1987) 185-189.

    Google Scholar 

  35. J.E. Wennberg, J.L. Freeman, R.M. Shelton and T.A. Bubolz, Hospital use and mortality among Medicare beneficiaries in Boston and New Haven, New England Journal of Medicine 321 (1989) 1168- 1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. J.E. Wennberg, Future directions for small area analysis, Medical Care 31(5) (1993) YS75-80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ozcan, Y.A. Physician benchmarking: measuring variation in practice behavior in treatment of otitis media. Health Care Management Science 1, 5–17 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019026114859

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019026114859

Keywords

Navigation