Abstract
Multiple-item measures of self-reported offending typically provide the principal outcome measures for individual level research on the causes of crime and deviance. This article directs attention to the substantial problems presented by the task of forming composite scores for these measures, and it presents a possible solution to those problems. We consider scaling by means of the graded response model from item response theory (IRT) as a potential means of overcoming the shortcomings of traditional summative scaling and of obtaining valuable information about the strengths and weaknesses of our measures. We illustrate this strategy through a scale analysis of a fourteen-item, self-report measure of delinquency, using three years of data from the Monitoring the Future study, an annual national survey of high school seniors. The graded response model proves to be consistent with the data, and it provides results that address important substantive questions about self-report measures. The findings are informative about the strengths and weaknesses of alternative strategies for developing self-report instruments, indicating that there is little to be gained by making fine distinctions in the frequency of individual delinquent acts.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Andrich, D. (1988). Rasch Models for Measurement. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no. 07-068. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Arnold, W. R. (1965). Continuities in research: Scaling delinquent behavior. Social Problems 13: 59-66.
Bachman, J. G., O'Malley, P. M., and Johnston, L. D. (1991). The Monitoring the Future Project After Seventeen Years: Design and Procedures. (Occasional Paper #33.) Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI.
Bachman, J. G., O'Malley, P. M., and Johnston, L. D. (1993). Monitoring the Future: Questionnaire Responses from the Nation's High School Seniors, 1992, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI.
Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J., and Visher, C. A. (1986). Criminal Careers and “Career” Criminals, Volume 1, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., and Farrington, D. P. (1988). Criminal career research: Its value for criminology. Criminology 26: 1-35.
Bock, R. D., and Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: An application of the EM algorithm. Psychometrika 46: 443-459.
Brodsky, S. L., and Smitherman, H. O. (1983). Handbook of Scales for Research in Crime and Delinquency, Plenum Press, New York.
Curry, D. G., and Spergel, I. A. (1991). Youth gang involvement and delinquency. Paper, American Sociological Association. (SA Document Delivery Delivery Service (Soc Abstracts, 039, 03, 1991) 91S25020-16 pages.)
Dentler, R. A., and Monroe, L. J. (1961). Social correlates of early adolescent theft. Am. Sociol. Review 26: 733-743.
DeRoos, Y. S., and Allen-Meares, P. (1992). Rasch analysis: Its description and use analyzing the children's depression inventory. J. Soc. Serv. Rsrch 16: 1-17.
Donovan, J., and Jessor, R. J. (1985). Structure of problem behavior in adolescence and young adulthood. J. Consult. Clinic. Psych. 53: 890-904.
Donovan, J., Jessor, R. J., and Costa, F. M. (1988). Syndrome of problem behavior in preadolescence: A replication. J. Consult. Clinic. Psych. 56: 762-765.
Elliott, D. S., and Ageton, S. S. (1980). Reconciling race and class differences in self-reported and official estimates of delinquency. Am. Sociol. Rev. 45: 95-110.
Elliott, D. S., Huizinga D., and Ageton, S. S. (1985). Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., and Menard, S. (1989). Multiple Problem Youth: Delinquency, Substance Use, and Mental Health Problems, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Embretson, S. E. (1996). The new rules of measurement. Psych. Assess. 8: 341-349.
Gold, M. (1966). Undetected delinquent behavior. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 3: 27-46.
Cole, Belmont, CA}.
Gottfredson, M., and Hirschi, T. (1986). The true value of lambda would appear to be zero: An essay on career criminals, criminal careers, selective incapacitation, cohort studies, and related topics. Criminology 24: 213-233.
Gottfredson, M., and Hirschi, T. (1988). Science, public policy, and the career paradigm. Criminology 26: 37-56.
Gottfredson, M., and Hirschi, T. (1990). A General Theory of Crime, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
Gray-Little, B., Williams, V. S. L., and Hancock, T. D. (1997). An item response theory analysis of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Pers. Soc. Psych. Bull. 23: 443-451.
Gulliksen, H. (1950). Theory of Mental Tests, Wiley, New York.
Hambleton, R. K., and Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications, Kluwer-Nijhoff, Boston.
Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., and Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., and Weis, J. G. (1979). Correlates of delinquency: The illusion of discrepancy between self-report and official measures. Am. Sociol. Rev. 44: 995-1014.
Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., and Weis, J. G. (1981). Measuring Delinquency, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Hindelang, M. J., and Weis, J. G. (1972). Personality and self-reported delinquency: An application of cluster analysis. Criminology 10: 268-294.
Huizinga, D., and Elliott, D. S. (1986). Reassessing the reliability and validity of self-report delinquency measures. J. Quant. Criminol. 2: 293-327.
Judd, C. M., and McClelland, G. H. (1989). Data Analysis: A Model-Comparison Approach, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San Diego, CA.
Kingston, N. M., and Dorans, N. J. (1985). The analysis of item-ability regressions: An exploratory IRT model fit tool. App. Psych. Meas. 9: 281-288.
Koch, W. R. (1983). Likert scaling using the graded response latent trait model. App. Psych. Meas. 7: 15-32.
Kuder, G. F., and Richardson, W. W. (1937). The theory of the estimate of test reliability. Psychometrika 2: 151-160.
Lazarsfeld, P. F., and Henry, N. W. (1968). Latent Structure Analysis, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA.
Leung, K., and Drasgow, F. (1986). Relation between self-esteem and delinquent behavior in three ethnic groups: An application of item response theory. J. Cross-Cultural Psych. 17: 151-167.
Long, J. S. (1997). Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Lord, F. M. (1952). A Theory of Test Scores, Psychometric Monograph No. 7. Psychometric Society.
Lord, F. M., and Novick, M. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Tests, Addison-Wesley, New York.
McMorris, B. J. (1997). Using Latent Structural Analysis to Examine the Distribution of Problem Behavior: Discrete Types vs. Propensity Explanations of Criminality, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE.
McRae, J. A. (1991). Rasch measurement and differences between women and men in self-esteem. Soc. Sci. Res. 20: 421-436.
Nugent, W. R., and Hankins, J. A. (1989). The use of item-response theory in social work measurement and research. Soc. Serv. Rev. 63: 447-472.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York.
Nye, F. I., and J. F. Short, Jr. (1957). Scaling delinquent behavior. American Sociological Review 22: 326-331.
Osgood, D. W., Finken, L. L., and McMorris, B. J. (forthcoming). Analyzing multiple-item measures of crime and deviance II: Tobit regression analysis of transformed scores. J. Quant. Criminol.
Osgood, D. W., Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., and Bachman, J. G. (1988). The generality of deviance in late adolescence and early adulthood. Am. Sociol. Rev. 53: 81-94.
Osgood, D. W., and Rowe, D. C. (1994). Bridging criminal careers, theory, and policy through latent variable models of individual offending. Criminology 32: 517-554.
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Danish Institute for Educational Research, Copenhagen.
Reise, S. P. (1999). Personality measurement issues viewed through the eyes of IRT. In Embretson, S. E., and Hershberger, S. L. (eds.), The New Rules of Measurement: What Every Psychologist and Educator Should Know, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Reiser, M. (1989). An application of the item-response model to psychiatric epidemiology. Sociol. Meth. Rsrch 18: 66-103.
Rowe, D. C., and Flannery, D. J. (1994). An examination of environmental and trait influences on adolescent delinquency. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 31: 374-389.
Rowe, D. C., Osgood, D. W., and Nicewander, W. A. (1990). A latent trait approach to unifying criminal careers. Criminology 28: 237-270.
Rowe, D. C., and Rodgers, J. L. (1989). Behavior genetics, adolescent deviance, and 'd': contributions and issues. In Adams, G. R., Montemayor, R., and Gullotta, T. P. (eds.), Biology of Adolescent Behavior and Development, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, No. 17.
Santor, D. C., and Ramsay, J. O. (1998). Progress in the technology of measurement: Applications of item response models. Psych. Assess. 10: 345-359.
Schaeffer, N. C. (1988). An application of item response theory to the measurement of depression. Sociol. Meth. 18: 271-308.
Sellin, J. T., and Wolfgang, M. W. (1964). The Measurement of Delinquency, Wiley, New York.
Shannon, L. W. (1968). Scaling juvenile delinquency. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 5: 52-65.
Short, J. F., Jr., and Nye, F. I. (1957). Reported behavior as a criterion of deviant behavior. Soc. Problems 5: 207-213.
Short, J. F., Jr., and Nye, F. I. (1958). Extent of unrecorded juvenile delinquency: Tentative conclusions. J. Crim. Law and Criminol. 49: 296-302.
Steinberg, L., and Thissen, D. (1995). Item response theory in personality research. In Shrout, P. E., and Fiske, S. T. (eds.), Personality Research, Methods, and Theory: A Festschrift Honoring Donald W. Fiske, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Stine, W. W. (1989). Meaningful inference: The role of measurement in statistics. Psych. Bulletin 105: 147-155.
Thissen, D. (1991). MULTILOG User's Guide, Version 6.0, Scientific Software, Chicago.
Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., Pysczynski, T., and Greenberg, J. (1983). An item response theory for personality and attitude scales: Item analysis using restricted factor analysis. App. Psych. Measure. 7: 211-226.
Wanderer, J. J. (1984). Scaling Delinquent Careers Over Time. Criminology 22: 83-95.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Osgood, D.W., McMorris, B.J. & Potenza, M.T. Analyzing Multiple-Item Measures of Crime and Deviance I: Item Response Theory Scaling. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 18, 267–296 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016008004010
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016008004010