Abstract
Social scientists examining whether stake in conformity conditions the deterrent effect of arrest for domestic violence recidivism have applied criminological theory to an important criminal justice issue. We extend this research with a discussion and multi-level analysis of the possible interplay between court dispositions and (a) an offender's stake in conformity, and (b) the proportion of “higher stake” residents in an offender's census tract of residence. The prevalence of re-arrest for intimate assault (misdemeanor and felony) is examined for 3110 suspects of misdemeanor intimate assault in Cincinnati. Findings reveal a significant main effect involving higher re-arrest likelihoods for arrested suspects with no formal charges filed against them. Results for the conditioned effects of court dispositions reveal significantly lower re-arrest likelihoods for higher stake offenders undergoing a counseling program (a predicted relationship), and significantly lower re-arrest likelihoods for lower stake offenders serving probation and/or jail (opposite to the predicted relationship). At the neighborhood-level, sentences of probation and/or jail correspond with significantly lower re-arrest likelihoods for offenders living in neighborhoods with more residentially stable populations (as predicted). We discuss the implications of our study for future research.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Berk, R. A., and Freedman, D. A. (1995). Statistical assumptions as empirical commitments. In Blomberg and Cohen (eds.), Law, Order, Punishment and Social Control: Essays in Honor of Sheldon Messinger, Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp. 245-258.
Berk, R. A., Campbell, A., Klap, R., and Western, B. (1992). A Bayesian analysis of the Colorado Springs spouse abuse experiment. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 83: 170-200.
Black, D. (1976). The Behaior of Law, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
Blalock, H. (1979). Social Statistics, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., and Nagin, D. (1978). Estimating the Effects of Criminal Sanctions on Crime Rates, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G. J., Klebanov, P. K., and Sealand, N. (1993). Do neighborhoods influence child and adolescent development? Amer. J. Sociol. 99: 353-395.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory, Belknap/Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Davis, R. C., Smith, B. E., and Nickles, L. (1997). Prosecuting Domestic Violence Cases with Reluctant Victims: Assessing Two Novel Approaches in Milwaukee. Final Report, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.
Dunford, F. W., Huizinga, D., and Elliott, D. S. (1990). The role of arrest in domestic assault: The Omaha police experiment. Criminology 28: 183-206.
Elliott, D. S., Wilson, W. J., Huizinga, D., and Sampson, R. J. (1996). The effects of neighborhood disadvantage on adolescent development. J. Res. Crime and Delinquency 34: 389-426.
Erez, E., and Belknap, J. (1998). In their own words: Battered women's assessment of the criminal processing system's responses. Violence and Victims 13: 251-268.
Fagan, J. (1996). The Criminalization of Domestic Violence: Promises and Limits. Research Report, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.
Ferraro, K. J., and Boychuck, T. (1992). In Buzawa, E. S., and Buzawa, C. G. (eds.), Domestic Violence: The Changing Criminal Justice Response, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 209-225.
Ford, D. A., and Regoli, M. J. (1993). The Indianapolis Domestic Violence Prosecution Experiment. Final Report, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.
Garner, J., Fagan, J., and Maxwell, C. (1995). Published findings from the spouse assault replication program: A critical review. J. Quantit. Crimin. 11: 3-29.
Gottfredson, M., and Hirschi, T. (1990). A General Theory of Crime, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
Gottfredson, D. C., McNeil, R. J., and Gottfredson, G. D. (1991). Social area influences on delinquency: A multilevel analysis. J. Res. Crime and Delinquency 28: 197-226.
Grasmick, H. G., and McLaughlin, S. D. (1978). Deterrence and social control (Comment on Silberman, ASR June, 1976). Amer. Sociol. Rev. 43: 272-278.
Hagan, J. (1994). Crime and Disrepute, Sage, CA.
Hagan, J., Simpson, J. H., and Gillis, A. R. (1987). Class in the household: A power-control theory of gender and delinquency. Amer. J. Sociol. 92: 788-816.
Hagan, J., MacMillan, R., and Wheaton, B. (1996). New kid in town: Social capital and the life course effects of family migration on children. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61: 368-385.
Hanushek, E., and Jackson, J. (1977). Statistical Methods for Social Scientists, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
Harrell, A. V. (1991). Evaluation of Court-Ordered Treatment for Domestic Violence Offenders. Final Report, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC.
Hindelang, M. (1973). Causes of delinquency: A partial replication and extension. Soc. Prob. 20: 471-487.
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of Delinquency. University of California Press, Berkley, CA.
Kornhauser, R. R. (1978). Social Sources of Delinquency: An Appraisal of Analytic Models, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Kreft, I., and DeLeeuw, J. (1998). Introducing Multilevel Modeling, Sage, London.
Krutschnitt, C. (1996). Contributions of quantitative methods to the study of gender and crime, or bootstrapping our way into the theoretical thicket. J. Quantit. Crimin. 12:135-161.
Langbein, L. I., and Lichtman, A. J. (1978). Ecological Inference, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Maltz, M. D. (1984). Recidivism, Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
Manski, C. F., and Nagin, D. S. (1998). Bounding disagreements about treatment effects: A case study of sentencing and recidivism. In Raferty, A. (ed.), Sociol. Methodol. pp. 99-137.
Miles-Doan, R. (1998). Violence between spouses and intimates: Does neighborhood context matter? Social Forces 77: 623-645.
Nye, F. I. (1958). Family Relationships and Delinquency Behavior, John Wiley, New York, NY.
Packer, H. (1968). The Limits of the Criminal Sanction, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
Pate, A., and Hamilton, E. (1992). Formal and informal deterrents to domestic violence: The Dade County spouse assault experiment. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 57:691-697.
Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Bachman, R., and Sherman, L. (1997). Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law and Soc. Rev. 31: 163-204.
Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y., and Congdon, R. (2000). HLM5: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling, Scientific Software International, Chicago, IL.
Rebovich, D. J. (1996). Prosecution response to domestic violence: Results of a survey of large jurisdictions. In Buzawa, E. S., and Buzawa, C. G. (eds.), Do Arrests and Restraining Orders Work? Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Reckless, W. C. (1961). The Crime Problem (3rd edn.), Meredith, New York, NY.
Reiss, A. J. Jr. (1951). Delinquency as the failure of personal and social controls. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 16: 196-207.
Reiss, A. J. Jr. (1985). Some failures in designing data collection that distort results. In Burstein, L., Freeman, H. E., and Rossi, P. H. (eds.), Collecting Eûaluation Data: Problems and Solutions, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 161-177.
Sampson, R. J. (1991). Linking the micro-and macrolevel dimensions of community social organization. Social Forces 70: 43-64.
Sampson, R. J., and Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points Through the Life Course, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., and Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 277: 918-924.
Scheff, T. J., and Retzinger, S. M. (1991). Emotions and Violence: Shame and Rage in Destructive Conflicts, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
Shaw, C. R., and McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile Delinquency in Urban Areas, University of Chicago Press, IL.
Sherman, L. W. (1992). The influence of criminology on criminal law: Evaluating arrests for misdemeanor domestic violence. J. Crim. Law and Criminol. 83: 1-45.
Sherman, L. W. (1993). Defiance, deterrence, and irrelevance: A theory of the criminal sanction. J. Res. Crime and Delinq. 30: 445-473.
Sherman, L. W., and Berk, R. A. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 49: 261-272.
Sherman, L., and Smith, D. (1992). Crime, punishment, and stake in conformity: Legal and informal control of domestic violence. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 57: 680-690.
Sherman, L. W., Schmidt, J. D., and Rogan, D. P. (1992a). Policing Domestic Violence: Experiments and Dilemmas, The Free Press, New York, NY.
Sherman, L., Schmidt, J., Rogan, D., Smith, D., Gartin, P., Cohn, E., Collins, D., and Bacich, A. (1992b). The variable effects of arrest on criminal careers: The Milwaukee domestic violence experiment. J. Crim. Law and Criminol. 83: 137-169.
Silberman, M. (1976). Toward a theory of criminal deterrence. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 41: 442-461.
Simcha-Fagan, O., and Schwartz, J. E. (1986). Neighborhood and delinquency: An assessment of contextual effects. Criminology 24: 667-703.
Tittle, C., and Logan, C. (1973). Sanctions and deviance: Evidence and remaining questions. Law and Soc. Rev. 7: 371-392.
Toby, J. (1957). Social disorganization and stake in conformity: Complementary factors in the predatory behavior of hoodlums. J. Crim. Law, Criminol. and Police Sci. 48: 12-17.
Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why People Obey the Law, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Walker, S. (1998). Sense and Nonsense About Crime and Drugs: A Policy Guide (4th edn.), West Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont.
Wells, L. E., and Rankin, J. H. (1988). Direct parental controls and delinquency. Criminol. 26: 263-285.
Williams, K. R., and Hawkins, R. (1986). Perceptual research on general deterrence: A critical overview. Law and Soc. Rev. 20: 545-572.
Zorza, J. (1992). The criminal law of misdemeanor domestic violence, 1970-90. J. Crim. Law and Criminol. 83: 46-72.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wooldredge, J., Thistlethwaite, A. Reconsidering Domestic Violence Recidivism: Conditioned Effects of Legal Controls by Individual and Aggregate Levels of Stake in Conformity. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 18, 45–70 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013292812895
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013292812895