Abstract
Medicine maintains a distinction between the medical symptom -- the patient's“subjective” experience and expression, and the privileged medical sign -- the “objective” findings observable by the doctor. Although the distinction is not consistently applied, it becomes clearly visible in the “undefined,” medically unexplained disorders of women patients. Potential impacts of genderized interaction on the interpretation of medical signs are addressed by re-reading the diagnostic process as a matter of social construction, where diagnosis results from human interpretation within a sociopolitical context. The discussion is illustrated by a case story and empirical evidence of the gendering in the doctor-patient relationship. The theoretical analysis is supported by semiotic perspectives of bodily signs, feminist theory on experience, and Foucault'sideas about medical perception and gaze, and concludes that a medical diagnosis is seldom a biological fact, but the outcome of a process where biological, cultural and social elements are interwoven. Further deconstruction of the chain of signs from a feminist perspective, assigning validity to the voice of the woman patient, might broaden the understanding of women'shealth, illness and disease.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Foucault M. The Birth of the Clinic. An Archaeology of Medical Perception. New York: Vintage Books, 1994/73.
King LS. Medical Thinking. A Historical Preface. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1982: 73–89.
Armstrong D. The patient's view. Soc Sci Med 1984; 18: 737–744.
Honkasalo, ML. Medical symptoms: A challenge for semiotic research. Semiotica 1991; 87: 251–268.
Chinen AB. Modes of understanding and mindfulness in clinical medicine. Theoretical Medicine 1988; 9: 45–71.
Albert DA, Munson R, Resnik MD. Reasoning in Medicine. An Introduction to Clinical Inference. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.
Malterud K. Women's undefined disorders – A challenge for clinical communication. Family Practice 1994; 9: 299–303.
Code L. What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press, 1991.
Hoopes J, ed. Peirce on Signs. Writings on Semiotic by Charles Sanders Peirce. Chapel Hill/London: The University of North Carolina Press, 1991.
Graffy J. Patient choice in a practice with men and women general practitioners. British Journal of General Practice 1990; 40: 13–15.
Philliber SG, Jones J. Staffing a contraceptive service for adolescents: the importance of sex, race and age. Public Health Report 1992; 97: 165–169.
Brink Muinen A van der, Bakker DH de, Bensing JM. Consultations for women's health problems: factors influencing women's choice of sex of the general practitioner. British Journal of General Practice 1994; 44: 205–210.
Orzano AJ, Cody RP. Gender concordance between family practice residents and diagnoses in an ambulatory setting. Family Medicine 1995; 27: 440–443.
Pendleton D. Doctor – patient communication – a review. In: Pendleton D, Hasler J, eds. Doctor – Patient Communication. London: Academic Press Inc, 1983: 5–53.
Colameco S, Becker LA, Simpson M. Sex bias in the assessment of patient complaints. Journal of Family Practice 1983; 16: 1117–1121.
Armitage KJ, Schneiderman LJ, Bass RA. Response of physicians to medical complaints in men and women. JAMA 1979; 241: 2186–2187.
Peterson MC, Holbrook JH, von Hales D, Smith NL, Staker LV. Contributions of the history, physical examination, and laboratory investigation in making medical diagnosis. West J Med 1992; 156: 163–165.
Ayanian JZ, Epstein AM. Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 221–225.
Kjellstrand CM. Age, sex, and race inequality in renal transplantation. Arch Intern Med 1988; 148: 1305–1309.
Safran DG, Rogers WH, Tarlov AR, McHorney CA, Ware JE JR. Gender differences in medical treatment: The case of physician-prescribed activity restrictions. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 711–722.
Lurie N, Slater J, McGovern P, Ekstrum J, Quam L, Margolis K. Preventive care for women. Does the sex of the physician matter? N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 478–482.
Bensing JM, van den Brink Muinen A, deBakker DH. Gender differences in practice style: a Dutch study of general practitioners. Med Care 1993; 31: 219–229.
Bouchard L, Renaud M. Female and male physicians' attitudes toward prenatal diagnosis: a Pan-Canadian survey. Soc Sci Med 1997; 44: 381–392.
Seto TB, Taira DA, Davis RB, Safran C, Phillips RS. Effect of physician gender on the prescription of estrogen replacement therapy. J Gen Intern Med 1996; 11: 197–203.
Banazak DA. Late-life depression in primary care. How well are we doing? J Gen Intern Med 1996; 11: 163–167.
Wallen J, Waitzkin H, Stoeckle JD. Physician stereotypes about female health and illness: A study of patients sex and the informative process during medical interviews. Women & Health 1979; 4: 135–146.
Hall JA, Irish JT, Roter DL, Ehrlich CM, Miller LH. Gender in medical encounters: an analysis of physician and patient communication in a primary care setting. Health Psychol 1994; 13: 384–392.
Lilleaas UB. Når forskjellen blir synlig – kvinner med kroniske muskelsmerter i et kjønnsrolleperspektiv. [Making the difference visible – women with chronic muscular pain in a gender role perspective] Arbeidsnotat 8/95 – Senter for kvinneforskning. Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo, 1995 (in Norwegian).
Johansson EE, Hamberg K, Lindgren G, Westman G. “I've been crying my way” – qualitative analysis of allmenn group of female patients' consultation experiences. Family Practice 1996; 13: 498–503.
Lupton D. Medicine as Culture. Illness, Disease and the Body in Western Societies. London/Thousand Oaks/New Dehli: Sage Publications, 1994: 131–160.
Eccleston C, deWilliams C, Rogers WS. Patients' and professionals' understandings of the causes of chronic pain: Blame, responsitility and identity protection. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 699–709.
Sherwin S. No Longer Patient. Feminist Ethics and Health Care. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1992: 145–153.
Koran LM. The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments. N Engl J Med 1975; 293: 642–701.
Elmore JG, Wells CK, Lee CH, Howard DH, Feinstein AF. Variability in radiologists' interpretation of mammograms. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1493–1499.
Latour B, Woolgar S. Laboratory Life. The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton/ New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1986.
Hampton JR, Harrison MJG, Mitchell JRA, Prichard JS, Seymour C. Relative contributions of history-taking, physical examination, and laboratory investigation to diagnosis and management of medical outpatients. British Medical Journal 1975; 2: 486–489.
Melbye H. Diagnosis of pneumonia in adults in general practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 1992; 10: 226–233.
Johnsen R, Bernersen B, Straume B, Førde OH, Bostad L, Burhol PG. Prevalences of endoscopic and histological findings in subjects with and without dyspepsia. British Medical Journal 1991; 302: 749–752.
Daniel, SL. The patient as text: A model of clinical hermeneutics. Theoretical Medicine 1986; 7: 195–210.
Fehr D. Kropp og symptom i en tegnteoretisk kontekst. [Body and symptom in a semiotic theoretical context]. Sosiologi i dag 1996; (4): 65–77 (in Norwegian).
Rudebeck CE. General practice and the dialogue of clinical practice. On symptoms, symptom presentations and bodily empathy. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 1991; Suppl 1: 72–81.
Scott JW. “Experience”. In: Butler J, Scott JW, eds. Feminists Theorize the Political. New York/London: Routledge, 1992: 22–40.
Hunter KM. Doctors' Stories. The Narrative Structure of Medical Knowledge. Princeton/New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1991: 3–26.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malterud, K. The (Gendered) Construction of Diagnosis Interpretation of Medical Signs in Women Patients. Theor Med Bioeth 20, 275–286 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009905523228
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009905523228