Skip to main content
Log in

A System Dynamics Model of Planned Organizational Change

  • Published:
Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper suggests that an induction of change program leads to atemporary impairment of organizational performance. A System Dynamics Modelportrays the process of planned organizational change. A set of keyvariables that facilitate or impede change is identified, quantified, andintegrated into the model. Three data sets, reproduced by simulation,demonstrate that the model is internally consistent and empiricallyadequate. The paper discusses theoretical and practical implications of the‘initial dip’ phenomenon in processes of planned change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bar-Nahor, R. (1996), Introducing an Information System as a Process of Directed Organizational Change, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

  • Beckhard, R. and W. Prichard (1992), Changing the Essence. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, D.P. and S.S. King (Eds.) (1995), Communicating Organizational Change: A Management Perspective. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R.M. and J.G. March (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R.H. (1995), Organization Theory and Design. 5th edition. St. Paul, MN: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1967), Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Brown, Little.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989), "Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High-Velocity Environments," Academy of Management Journal, 32, 543–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J.W. (1961), Industrial Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. (1977), Organization Design. Reading, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, L.E. (1992), "Resistance to Change During Restructuring," Journal of Management Inquiry, 1, 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T. and J. Freeman (1984), "Structural Inertia and Organizational Change," American Sociological Review, 4, 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, A.G. (1979), "Towards the Economic Assessment of New Forms of Work Organization," in C.L. Cooper and E. Manford (Eds.), The Quality of Working Life in Western and in Eastern Europe. Greenwood: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G.P. and W.H. Glick (Eds.) (1995), Organizational Change and Redesign. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G.P., K.M. Sutcliffe, C.C. Miller and W.H. Glick (1995), "Understanding and Predicting Organizational Change," in G.P. Huber and W.H. Glick (Eds.), Organizational Change and Redesign. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, C. and R. Bronson (1985), Simulating Violators. Baltimore, MD: Operational Research Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnes, E.A. (1973), The Sociology of Organizational Change. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimberely, J.R. (1984), Managing Organizational Transitions. Homewood, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lant, T.K. (1992), "Aspiration Level Adaptation: An Empirical Exploration," Management Science, 38, 623–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lant, T.K. and S.J. Mezias (1992), "An Organizational Learning Model of Convergence and Reorientation," Organization Science, 3, 47–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, L.L. (1986), High Involvement Management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P.R. and J.W. Lorsch (1967), Organization and Environment. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D. (1991), "Organizational Adaptation and Environmental Selection: Interrelated Processes of Change," Organization Science, 2, 140–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D. and J.G. March (1981), "A Model of Adaptive Organizational Search," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,2, 307–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, B. and J.G. March (1988), "Organizational Learning," Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Z. and K.M. Carley (1995), "DYCORP: A Computational Framework for Examining Organizational Performance Under Dynamic Conditions," Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 20, 193–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Z. and K.M. Carley (1997), "Organizational Response: The Cost of Performance Tradeoff," Management Science, 43, 217–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. (1981), "Footnotes on Organizational Change," Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 463–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and H.J. Simon (1958), Organizations. New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrow, A.J., D.G. Bowers and S.E. Seashore (1967), Management by Participation. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWinney, W. (1992), Paths of Change: Strategic Choices for Organizations and Societies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. and P. Friesen (1980), "Archetypes of Organizational Transition," Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 463–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirvis, P.M. and B.A. Macy (1983), "Evaluating Programs Costs and Benefits," in S.E. Seashore et al. (Eds.) Assessing Organizational Change, New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R.E. and K.S. Cameron (Eds.) (1988), Paradox and Change: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, N.M. (1983), Managing Strategic Change. New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M.L. and E. Romanelli (1985), "Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation," in L.L. Cummings and B.M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 7. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A.H. and S.M. Poole (1995), "Explaining Development and Change in Organizations," Academy of Management Review, 20, 510–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E. (1979), The Psychology of Organizing. 2nd edition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, G. and R. Duncan (1977), Strategies for Planned Change. New York: Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Samuel, Y., Jacobsen, C. A System Dynamics Model of Planned Organizational Change. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 3, 151–171 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009664618421

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009664618421

Navigation