Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Harnessing Digital Videos to Promote Cancer Prevention and Education: a Systematic Review of the Literature from 2013–2018

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social media has transformed the way cancer patients search for information about their chronic health problems. The purpose of this systematic review is to identify the use of online digital videos to increase cancer knowledge and to understand information preference, behavioral changes, and attitudes towards online cancer education videos. The databases used for this review included MedLine, PsychINFO, and PubMed. These medical databases were used to locate peer-reviewed academic journals from 2013–2018 using the following MeSH terms: “cancer education videos,” “cancer prevention videos,” and “cancer education digital videos.” A total of 4996 articles were retrieved from the initial search, and 33 articles were reviewed. Articles were excluded if videos did not (1) focus on cancer education and prevention; (2) posted on an online platform; and (3) assessed participants’ knowledge, attitude, or beliefs about cancer. Eleven articles were found to meet inclusion criteria for final review. All of the studies focused on increasing education on preventive health behaviors (i.e., sunscreen use, smoking, and diet) and/or early detection strategies (i.e., screening testing and/or self-skin exams). While online digital health videos have the potential to improve health outcomes, issues related to technology access and health literacy must be considered when developing online health education videos.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mo P (2012) The use of Internet for health education. J Biosafety Health Educ. 1:1000e1102. Accessed: June 5, 2018.

  2. Fox SR 2002, L. Vital decisions: a Pew Internet Health Report; http://www.pewinternet.org/2002/05/22/vital-decisions-a-pew-internet-health-report/. Accessed: June 5, 2018.

  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC’s guide to writing for social media. 2016; https://www.cdc.gov/socialmedia/tools/guidelines/guideforwriting.html.

  4. Perrin A. 2015 Social media usage: 2005-2015. Pew Research Center.

  5. Pew Research Center. Social Media Fact Sheet. 2018.

  6. Fox SD, M. Health Online 2013. Retrieved from: http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/. Accessed: June 5, 2018.

  7. The Nielsen Total Audience Report: QI 2018. The Nielsen Company;2018.

  8. Welch V, Petkovic J, Pardo Pardo J, Rader T, Tugwell P (2016) Interactive social media interventions to promote health equity: an overview of reviews. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can 36:63–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. National Cancer Institute. About cancer health disparities. 2015; Retrieved from: https://www.cancer.gov/about-nci/organization/crchd/about-health-disparities. Accessed: March 5, 2018.

  10. Siegel LRM, Miller KD, Jemal A (2018) Cancer Statistics, 2018. Cancer J Clin. 68:7–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. What is health literacy? 2016; Retrieved from: https://www.cdc.gov/healthliteracy/learn/index.html. Accessed: June 5, 2018.

  12. Portnoy DB, Scott-Sheldon LA, Johnson BT, Carey MP (2008) Computer-delivered interventions for health promotion and behavioral risk reduction: a meta-analysis of 75 randomized controlled trials, 1988-2007. Prev Med. 47:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Leykin Y, Thekdi SM, Shumay DM, Munoz RF, Riba M, Dunn LB (2012) Internet interventions for improving psychological well-being in psycho-oncology: review and recommendations. Psychooncology. 21:1016–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jones GE, Singletary JH, Cashmore A et al (2016) Developing and assessing the utility of a You-Tube based clinical genetics video channel for families affected by inherited tumours. Fam Cancer. 15:351–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sweat M, O’Donnell C, O’Donnell L (2001) Cost-effectiveness of a brief video-based HIV intervention for African American and Latino sexually transmitted disease clinic clients. AIDS. 15:781–787

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gagliano ME (1988) A literature review on the efficacy of video in patient education. J Med Educ. 63:785–792

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sobel RM, Paasche-Orlow MK, Waite KR, Rittner SS, Wilson EA, Wolf MS (2009) Asthma 1-2-3: a low literacy multimedia tool to educate African American adults about asthma. J Community Health. 34:321–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Denny MC, Vahidy F, Vu KY, Sharrief AZ, Savitz SI (2017) Video-based educational intervention associated with improved stroke literacy, self-efficacy, and patient satisfaction. PLoS One. 12:e0171952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yeung DL, Alvarez KS, Quinones ME et al (2017) Low-health literacy flashcards & mobile video reinforcement to improve medication adherence in patients on oral diabetes, heart failure, and hypertension medications. J Am Pharm Assoc. 57:30–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tuong W, Larsen ER, Armstrong AW. Videos to influence: A systematic review of effectiveness of video-based education in modifying health behaviors. J Behav Med. 2014;37(2):218–33

  21. Bol N, Smets EM, Rutgers MM, Burgers JA, de Haes HC, Loos EF, van Weert J (2013) Do videos improve website satisfaction and recall of online cancer-related information in older lung cancer patients? Patient Educ Couns. 92(3):404–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Prakash SR, Verma S, McGowan J, Smith BE, Shroff A, Gibson GH, Cheng M, Lowe Ii D, Gopal K, Mohanty SR (2013) Improving the quality of colonoscopy bowel preparation using an educational video. Can J Gastroenterol. 27:696–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsai S, Frank SH, Bordeaux JS (2018) Improving sun-protective behaviors and self-skin examinations among African Americans: a randomized controlled trial. Dermatol Surg. 44:512–518

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Perrault EK, Silk KJ (2014) Testing the effects of the addition of videos to a website promoting environmental breast cancer risk reduction practices: are videos worth it? J Appl Commun Res. 42:20–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lauckner C, Whitten P (2016) The differential effects of social media sites for promoting skin cancer risk reduction. Pyschooncology 31:449–452

    Google Scholar 

  26. Roman CJ, Guan X, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Xu J, Bordeaux JS (2016) A trial online educational melanoma program aimed at the Hispanic population improves knowledge and behaviors. Dermatol Surg. 42:672–676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee MK, Shin G (2018) A mobile intervention for women’s health of North Korean defectors. Public Health Nursing. 35(6):558–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Palmer CG, Boudreault P, Berman BA et al (2017) Bilingual approach to online cancer genetics education for Deaf American Sign Language users produces greater knowledge and confidence than English text only: A randomized study. Disabil Health J. 10:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Volk RJ, Linder SK, Leal VB, Rabius V, Cinciripini PM, Kamath GR, Munden RF, Bevers TB (2014) Feasibility of a patient decision aid about lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography. Prev Med. 62:60–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hayat U, Lee PJW, Lopez R, Vargo JJ, Rizk MK (2016) Online educational video improves bowel preparation and reduces the need for repeat colonoscopy within three years. Am J Med 1129

  31. Damude S, Hoekstra-Weebers JEHM, Van Leeuwen BL, Hoekstra JH (2017) Melanoma patients disease-specific knowledge, information preference, and appreciation of educational YouTube videos for self-inspection. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:1528–1535

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Purcell KR 2014, L. Americans feel better informed thanks to the Internet. Pew Research Center.

  33. Anderson M. 2017 Digital divide persists even as lower-income Americans make gains in tech adoption; https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/03/22/digital-divide-persists-even-as-lower-income-americans-make-gains-in-tech-adoption/. Accessed: March 15, 2018.

  34. Raven MC, Kaplan LM, Rosenberg M, Tieu L, Guzman D, Kushel M (2018) Mobile phone, computer, and Internet use among older homeless adults: results from the HOPE HOME cohort study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 6:e10049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Vangeepuram N, Mayer V, Fei K et al (2018) Smartphone ownership and perspectives on health apps among a vulnerable population in East Harlem New York. Mhealth. 4:31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bornstein MH, Jager J, Putnick DL (2013) Sampling in developmental science: situations, shortcomings, solutions, and standards. Dev Rev. 33:357–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Thompson HS, Shelton RC, Mitchell J, Eaton T, Valera P, Katz A (2013) Inclusion of undeserved racial and ethnic groups in cancer intervention research using new media: a systematic literature review. JNCI Monographs. 2013:216–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Reducing health disparities in cancer. Retrieved from: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/healthdisparities/basic_info/disparities.htm. Accessed: January 3, 2018.

  39. Prochaska JJ, Coughlin SS, Lyons EJ (2017) Social media and mobile technology for cancer prevention and treatment. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 37:128–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jacobs W, Amuta AO, Jeon KC (2017) Health information seeking in the digital age: an analysis of health information seeking behavior among US adults. Cogent Soc Sci. 3(1):1302785

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mossberger K. 2003 Virtual Inequality: Beyond the Digital Divide. Georgetown University Press.

  42. Lazarus W, Francisco M (2000) Online content for low-income and underserved Americans: The digital divide’s new frontier. A strategic aduit of activities and opportunities, Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey 2017 New Investigator Award (P30CA072720) and the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (K22CA197066) to Dr. Pamela Valera.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela Valera.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Acuna, N., Vento, I., Alzate-Duque, L. et al. Harnessing Digital Videos to Promote Cancer Prevention and Education: a Systematic Review of the Literature from 2013–2018. J Canc Educ 35, 635–642 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01624-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01624-0

Keywords

Navigation