Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze whether different fixation methods such as freezing or formaldehyde storage for different periods of time have an influence on the recognition of anatomical relevant structures in the middle and inner ear of the cat with conventional computed tomography (cCT) and micro-computed tomography (µCT). Besides, effects of freeze–thaw cycles on determined structures of the ear were investigated by means of histological slices. Three veterinarians with different radiologic expertise evaluated the scans of 30 dissected cat ears anonymously and scored predefined structures in a five-point scale with reference to visually sharp reproducibility and perfect image quality. The total scores of the different fixation groups as well as the ears within a group were compared with each other. Furthermore, an intra-reader examination including an evaluation of the identifiability of specified structures was performed for both imaging methods. cCT as well as µCT-scans have a very low variation coefficient of 1.6% and 2.3%, respectively. The results for the alterations between the different fixation methods show that the changes for cCT-scans are negligible, as the percentage alteration compared to fresh samples ranges in a very small interval with values from 1.0% better to 1.2% worse. µCT-scans are more influenced by the fixation method with a range from 1.3% better to 6.9% worse values. The scans mostly deteriorated after two freeze–thaw cycles (1.8% worse) and after storing the samples for 1 (2.4% worse), respectively, and 3 weeks in formaldehyde (6.9% worse).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beck T, Kilchling TP, Meyer-Lindenberg A (2019) Differences between µCT-imaging and conventional CT for the diagnosis of possible diseases of the middle and inner cat ear. Anat Histol Embryol 48:268–276
Bolliger SA, Tomasin D, Heimer J, Richter H, Thali MJ, Gascho D (2018) Rapid and reliable detection of previous freezing of cerebral tissue by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 14:85–94
Bongartz G, Golding S, Jurik A, Leonardi van Meerten E, Geleijns J, Jessen K, Panzer W, Shrimpton P, Tosi G (1998) European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. EUR 16262 EN, 1–23
Bullen A, Taylor RR, Kachar B, Moores C, Fleck RA, Forge A (2014) Inner ear tissue preservation by rapid freezing: improving fixation by high-pressure freezing and hybrid methods. Hear Res 315:49–60
Cisneros JC, Brito R, Martins GS, Candido N, Ferraz R, Bento R (2017) Evaluation of the microgrinding procedure for the microscopic analysis of temporal bones. Cochlear Implants Int 18:106–115
Decraemer WF, Dirckx JJ, Funnell WR (2003) Three-dimensional modelling of the middle-ear ossicular chain using a commercial high-resolution X-ray CT scanner. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 4:250–263
Fallon JB, Shepherd RK, Nayagam DA, Wise AK, Heffer LF, Landry TG, Irvine DR (2014) Effects of deafness and cochlear implant use on temporal response characteristics in cat primary auditory cortex. Hear Res 315:1–9
George SS, Wise AK, Shivdasani MN, Shepherd RK, Fallon JB (2014) Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants in acutely deafened cats. J Neural Eng 11:065003
Hammer N, Voigt C, Werner M, Hoffmann F, Bente K, Kunze H, Scholz R, Steinke H (2014) Ethanol and formaldehyde fixation irreversibly alter bones’ organic matrix. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 29:252–258
Hassepass F, Bulla S, Maier W, Laszig R, Arndt S, Beck R, Traser L, Aschendorff A (2014) The new mid-scala electrode array: a radiologic and histologic study in human temporal bones. Otol Neurotol 35:1415–1420
Kim JS, Lee JS, Park M-H, Kang H, Lee JJ, Lee H-J, Im KC, Moon DH, Lim S-M, Oh S-H (2008) Assessment of cerebral glucose metabolism in cat deafness model: strategies for improving the voxel-based statistical analysis for animal PET studies. Mol Imaging Biol 10:154–161
Klop AC, Vester MEM, Colman KL, Ruijter JM, Van Rijn RR, Oostra RJ (2017) The effect of repeated freeze-thaw cycles on human muscle tissue visualized by postmortem computed tomography (PMCT). Clin Anat 30:799–804
Lander SL, Brits D, Hosie M (2014) The effects of freezing, boiling and degreasing on the microstructure of bone. Homo 65:131–142
Lane JI, Witte RJ, Driscoll CL, Camp JJ, Robb RA (2004) Imaging microscopy of the middle and inner ear: Part I: CT microscopy. Clin Anat 17:607–612
Lee W, Jasiuk I (2014) Effects of freeze–thaw and micro-computed tomography irradiation on structure-property relations of porcine trabecular bone. J Biomech 47:1495–1498
Levy AD, Harcke HT, Mallak CT (2010) Postmortem imaging: MDCT features of postmortem change and decomposition. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 31:12–17
Maran A, Khosla S, Riggs BL, Zhang M, Ritman EL, Turner RT (2003) Measurement of gene expression following cryogenic mu-CT scanning of human iliac crest biopsies. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 3:83–88
McElderry JD, Kole MR, Morris MD (2011) Repeated freeze-thawing of bone tissue affects Raman bone quality measurements. J Biomed Opt 16:071407
Middlebrooks JC, Snyder RL (2007) Auditory prosthesis with a penetrating nerve array. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 8:258–279
Morita K, Doi K, Oue H, Kajihara S, Hayashi K, Akagawa Y (2013) Influence of formalin fixation on the implant stability quotient and mechanical characteristics of bone. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:550–554
Peake WT, Rosowski JJ, Lynch TJ (1992) Middle-ear transmission: acoustic versus ossicular coupling in cat and human. Hear Res 57:245–268
Poznyakovskiy AA, Zahnert T, Kalaidzidis Y, Schmidt R, Fischer B, Baumgart J, Yarin YM (2008) The creation of geometric three-dimensional models of the inner ear based on micro computer tomography data. Hear Res 243:95–104
Schuknecht H (1993) Pathology of the inner ear, 2nd edn. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia
Scruggs JL, Flatland B, Reed A (2014) Effects of freezing on tissue factor activity in a thromboelastography assay. Vet Clin Pathol 43:322–325
Seidel A, Bergauer B, Lell M, Buder T, von Wilmowsky C, Dach E, Wichmann M, Matta RE (2018) Does formalin fixation influence MSCT/CBCT accuracy? Surg Radiol Anat 40:31–37
Smith ZM, Delgutte B (2007) Using evoked potentials to match interaural electrode pairs with bilateral cochlear implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 8:134–151
Tirko NN, Ryugo DK (2012) Synaptic plasticity in the medial superior olive of hearing, deaf, and cochlear-implanted cats. J Comp Neurol 520:2202–2217
Uzun H, Curthoys IS, Jones AS (2007) A new approach to visualizing the membranous structures of the inner ear—high resolution X-ray micro-tomography. Acta Otolaryngol 127:568–573
van der Made AD, Maas M, Beenen LF, Oostra RJ, Kerkhoffs GM (2013) Postmortem imaging exposed: an aid in MR imaging of musculoskeletal structures. Skelet Radiol 42:467–472
Wehrl HF, Bezrukov I, Wiehr S, Lehnhoff M, Fuchs K, Mannheim JG, Quintanilla-Martinez L, Kohlhofer U, Kneilling M, Pichler BJ, Sauter AW (2015) Assessment of murine brain tissue shrinkage caused by different histological fixatives using magnetic resonance and computed tomography imaging. Histol Histopathol 30:601–613
Wei Z, Niu Q, Zhang F, Xiao K, Liu L, Wang Y, Jia J, Cao J, Fu S, Yun K (2017) The effect of sodium fluoride, formaldehyde, and storage temperature on the stability of methamidophos in post-mortem blood and liver. Int J Legal Med 131:667–675
Acknowledgements
Thanks go to the team in the laboratory in the area of research of the veterinary faculty of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich who supported and guided the author on how to operate with the µCT and the machines to prepare the histological slices.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beck, T., Kilchling, T., Reese, S. et al. Influence of storage on the quality of conventional CT and µCT-imaging for the middle and inner cat ear. Anat Sci Int 95, 190–201 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-019-00509-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-019-00509-y